Gay Porn Report

SeanCody: Raymond & Paul (Bareback)

Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody

Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody

Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody

Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody

Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody

Watch Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody.com

I love that Raymond is coming out of his shell.

When we first met him, he was pretty quiet. Now…

“Give it to me!”

I was pretty surprised to hear him say it as he was bouncing up and down on Paul’s raw cock.

The two of them had started off kind of awkwardly, talking about football and workout routines and when they last jerked off.

Paul seemed pretty fascinated by Raymond’s big muscles. And he seemed very happy when he undid Raymond’s pants and a rock hard cock bounced out!

It definitely got interesting from there!

Paul fucked Raymond from behind, doggy style. It made for a fantastic view of Raymond’s hairy ass getting pounded!

This was definitely Raymond’s most vocal fucking yet!

Watch Raymond & Paul (Bareback) at SeanCody.com

145 Responses to SeanCody: Raymond & Paul (Bareback)

  1. avatar elmtree says:

    Wow, maybe SC is going 100% bb. Nice to see Paul back and Raymond’s ass is a tops dream. I watched the vid this morning and thought it was just ok, in spite of the hot cream pie ending

    • avatar CarlosEduarc says:

      I was thinking that SC is going for only BB too but, i think they have a lot of condom scenes they filmed earlier that they’re going to release. And they’re going to stop typing BAREBACK with caps after the transition.

    • avatar Neobamboom says:

      Wow. I didn’t think so either. But man watching hot guys bareback is hot. No twink shit here.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Each scene should stand on it’s own merits. From Models to Direction to technical matters such as camera work and lighting. Then add “no condoms” “oral cum shots” and “anal cum shots” (They look great on camera) and scenes will only get better, It’s literally the icing on the cake. It’s time studios face the simple facts It’s best for everyone involved. The studio, The models, The cameras (as in films better), and The Customers. So you see it a win-win situation. It’s entertainment in it’s highest form.

    • avatar ahartford123 says:

      I agree, Raymond is totally hot.

  2. avatar Jake45 says:

    Well, this was a surprise ;) I’m still not used to SC being bareback (I don’t I ever will be) but I love Paul and Raymond. I just hope in the future SC will post something about the sudden change. You would think they would at least talk about about it, outside the first ten seconds, since they spend so much time in BTS. Anyway, just gonna ride the wave! Glad to be first lol

    • avatar Jake45 says:

      Damn second…lol

    • avatar asswipe says:

      I think if Sean Cody was to speak of the much needed change that’s being implemented now it would be on some site like the gay section of XBIZ, The gay section of AVN or something like that. Even Sean Cody Reviews doesn’t exist any more. They are a few industry forums but you have to be in the industry and/or a affiliate to gain access in most cases. Those forums are most likely where the scoops are. Most of the time well in advance if someone from any studio is an active member.

    • avatar Jake45 says:

      I wonder how long this BB thing is going to last. CF was able to make it about six to eight months before they launched CF Select. SC will probably do the same or just go strictly BB but by that time, we’ll be over the hotness of their BB and go back to treating the site just we did before.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Jake45 in all due respect. CF has been wanting to run multiple sites at once for some time. Remember GuyGoneBi?. The CFSelect site is for the most part a good site if you want their hottest scenes that for the most part don’t appear on the main ACM and ACS sites and just want to buy a scene or two. In addition most of the CFSelect seems to be in higher bit rate as well as a higher 1280x720p resolution. However what does this say to subscribers on the ACM & ACS level? That their subscription money only buys them LESS than the hottest scenes and lower resolution videos (940x540p) ??? ask yourself why. I don’t believe Sean Cody is going to play the same game as CF, sure they are somewhat direct competitors…but they have their own visions and run their businesses accordingly t the difference is clear. It’s an apples and oranges case.

    • avatar Jake45 says:

      I don’t think the two are so different as you claim. Well, they have different perspectives they both offer the same materials. Separating the two different types of material not only puts more money in their pockets, but it makes everybody happy. I have read some of your earlier comments about porn being art, and while this is true, porn also offers education to young people. SC may say it does not endorse it but don’t you agree that hypocritical since they only show it for like three seconds before they show you the “hot” scene. Without separation, SC ignores the other aspect of porn: education. Older people will understand that condoms should be used in real life but young people are constantly being shown that condoms aren’t sexy. However hot or beautiful a scene is, we are not the only ones affected.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Pornography is entertainment.

  3. avatar Fazz says:

    Sean Cody is blowing it’s competition out of the water. I’ve seen the latest CF and CM updates, and they are NOT anything worth paying a dime for… (other than for Trey).

    I just hope that SC doesn’t let up, and keeps pressure on CF & CM, until they crack and crumble..

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Chaosmen has been with this program like 3 years ago. I don’t understand why anybody would reference them lately since they already are committed and truly have their policies in force. Corbin Fisher should not do select “no condoms” scenes at this point. It’s just plain silly. Now Sean Cody on the other hand is newer to this simple yet effective way to portray fantasies. They are all in competition with each other. However not on the level some may think. Fazz you said :
      “…I just hope that SC doesn’t let up, and keeps pressure on CF & CM, until they crack and crumble..”
      Yeah I don’t see that happening. Just as long as the studios have a steady stream of hot guys…Everybody Wins!

    • avatar asswipe says:

      I meant to say”…Corbin Fisher should not do select “condoms” scenes. It’s just silly at this point. Fuck a girl “no condom”, Fuck a guy with a girl in the room “no condom”. Only guys in the scenes “condoms must be worn while filming” in promo photographs you will not wear them however because it looks better on camera. Stop the insanity. No one is entertained. Condoms are not for adult art.

  4. avatar Bi Boy1986 says:

    Love this! I Love watching lads who know how to fuck. Glad SC is going BB. Love watching Paul’s bare cock sliding out of Raymond’s ass!

  5. avatar mitsaso says:

    Wow… those pics of Raymond’s ass getting creampied are out of this world…

    …now all SC needs to do is bring Jay back to get fucked bareback, and cum will explode through my brain.

    • avatar elmtree says:

      Funny, I was thinking the same thing as I watched Raymond’s hairy ass get fucked. I think it would be too much for me to see Jay’s perfect ass get fucked raw…but I’m willing to risk it!

  6. avatar DaddyYankee says:

    I really like Paul. He’s hot as hell. Sexy, beautiful.
    Instead I don’t like Raymond, that’s why I would have preferred another guy with Paul here.
    However the video is very, very, very hot! Both Paul and Raymond loved every minute of it.

    • avatar I Am Jake says:

      Paul is actually kind of boring. I went back and watched his other scenes. Assuming his scene with Derek was his first anal (not just the first one released), you can cut him slack for the newness of it, but this and his last scene just show he’s not very good at having sex with men. Some of this may be that they have a new camera guy (according to the BTS with the Dennis threesome a few updates back) and the bad camera work and editing SC seems to aspire to, but a lot of it is just him.

      I would rather have seen Raymond with someone else, especially given who his been paired with so far.

  7. avatar FeydRautha says:

    Ewwww!! I think Raymond is so gross! He’s just got TOO MUCH HAIR “down there”. I’m surprised Paul didn’t get “carpet burn”. (Maybe that’s what the water bottle’s for?)

    The hair, the overly-muscled body, that face (huge chin, virtually no top lip, bulbous nose). Raymond… ick!

  8. avatar solidus4 says:

    Paul has the handsome face Raymond has the perfect hairy body.

  9. avatar Southbay says:

    Paul is so damn hot. The boy knows how to fuck. Raymond point blank just fucks up this update. Great creampie at the end though

    • avatar I Am Jake says:

      Paul is hot? OK, if you think so.

      All I can say is that at least he’s honest. When he admits to not hitting the gym lately, it really shows when you compare his blow job scene (where he just gets serviced by Jamie) and how he looks in THAT to how slim and undefined he’s looks here, and the expressions on his face….

  10. avatar CarlosEduarc says:

    I like that SC don’t hold so much.
    But i think they’re holding one big BB update with super hot models.

    SC Should bring Carlton back and pair him with a daddy like model PLEASE!

  11. avatar zemyazem says:

    OMG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    PAUL IS SO SEXY AND BEAUTIFUL PLUS BAREBACK = MY FANTASY !!!

    THIS IS SO HOT…………..MORE CREAMPIE PLEASE SEAN CODY…..SO HOT

  12. avatar EverybodysAcritic says:

    My word, Sean Cody is going all in on bareback huh. I’m pretty surprised. I suspect they will no longer do condom scenes after a while.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      If hopefully so then “Ain’t Life Grand”.

    • avatar jazz says:

      I wonder how long it will be before others like CF (on the regular ACM site) and RB cave to the pressures of competition and start to feature more BB. I’ve learned to never say never, because up until a couple weeks ago, I NEVER imagined that SC would do BB scenes.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      jazz lets hope instead of ‘…start to feature more BB…”
      let us hope they “start to feature only BB”
      Until one day we think back to this time and say. Remember when they used to use condoms? What were the studios thinking back then covering up dicks with condoms. It’s made dicks look constricted and contorted while fucking an asshole. Plus it was like seeing a censored version of such a beautiful event that fucking ass is.

    • avatar jazz says:

      LOL, I guess I was going for baby steps! I’m not sure that many studios will be going all bareback anytime soon.

  13. avatar adowhat says:

    raymond despite having a very nice body doesn’t do anything for me. i’d take paul, the hot, goofy, nerdy looking guy over the hairy muscle raymond every time.

  14. avatar porndog says:

    Looks like another hot one. I’m not fond of Raymond’s face at all, but his body is not to be ignored. Paul is just too sexy for words! I think it’s worth repeating that BB is icing on the cake; but you have to have a cake to begin with. I think that’s where a lot of studios get it wrong. They look at BB as the draw, but there’s no substitute for hot models, good production values, and directing, and content, to name a few components; which makes for a great scene.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      porndog I agree with you 100 percent on this. There has always been Bareback, but your absolutely right without “…hot models, good production values, and directing, and content…” It’s no dice. In the past BB was “fugs models” at a “fug studio” with ever link in the chain “fuglier” So I never had any interest in that content. Now with the studios we already like or love, As long as they keep their standards up, it’s like “Everything’s Coming Up Roses”.

      (Better yet Everything’s Coming Up Mouths [Cum Eating] and Everything’s Coming Up Asses [Cream Pies] Tasty if it’s the right models)

    • avatar porndog says:

      I know what you mean. I tend not to watch those BB studios who feature models I wouldn’t watch in any capacity, much less BB. I used to wonder why only the homely models did BB while all the sexy, handsome ones used condoms (a few exceptions are the Euro studios). That’s what makes studios like BA, CM, CF & SC doing BB that much more attractive. We can watch BB with beautiful models.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      porndog looks like we are on the same page with the BB topic.

    • avatar jazz says:

      Porndog, I couldn’t agree more! The fact that we get to see generally attractive models doing BB is like a dream cum true!

    • avatar elmtree says:

      I also agree with this string. Actually, for me, its SC’s hot models which make these scenes hot, not the bb’ing.

    • avatar marcus carls says:

      Agreed, porndog. Let us eat CAKE. Someone said before that BB can’t make a bad scene good, and condoms can’t turn a hot scene bad. I second that emotion.

    • avatar elmtree says:

      Well said Marcus…great point.

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      I’ll throw in another vote for the sentiments in this thread. I would modify marcus’ astute observation a tad to say, “BB can’t make a bad scene good, but it can make a hot scene even hotter.” Doesn’t sounds as good that way, but IMO it’s more accurate.

    • avatar Daniel says:

      Couldn’t agree more with everything you said, porndog

  15. avatar Dave says:

    If only there was foreplay…

    • avatar asswipe says:

      As far as foreplay goes..yes it would be great if their was some intense lustful kissing with fondling that leads into removal of garments. Then longer dick sucking (bottom sucking the top) and ass eating (the top eating the bottoms ass before he fucks it) I also love it when the top doesn’t eat ass but has the bottom eat the tops ass. Of course all this has to be done with a great skill set.
      So yes Dave “If only there was foreplay…”

  16. avatar †orrie says:

    Ugh, Raymond is so fugly. Paul is hot and perfect as always though. Would love to see him paired with Jess or Brandon.

  17. avatar Nick Minaj says:

    I still think this whole BB thing with SC is a publicity stunt. But I like Paul and Raymond, so whatev I guess. I’m not really a fan of flip flops, but I would have liked to see one here. I just want to see Paul fucked period, to be honest. And not by someone like Jamie…or Calvin.

    • avatar marcus carls says:

      Not by Calvin?!?! Are you now a fan of Calvin’s? I thought everyone was (lol). I certainly am.

    • avatar jazz says:

      OMG Nick I just caught that too…what do you have against Calvin?

    • avatar Nick Minaj says:

      Marcus and jazz, you guys are asking me two different questions. Marcus, am I a fan? No. And jazz the answer to your question is also no, I don’t have any problems with Calvin. I don’t think you have to be a fan of a model to mind seeing their scenes. I was just saying I only like seeing him as a bottom and not a top.

      To be honest, the only models I have ever considered myself a “fan” of are as follows–Owen, Patrick, Kenny, Jay, Samuel, Isaak (not Isaac), Boyce, Spence, Danny, Mitch, Devin, Brendan, Jake, Dennis, Jeffrey, Allen, Rodney, Ford, Curtis and Harley. That said, it looks like Pavel, Paul, Jerek, Brandon and Raymond will be added to my list soon. Not to mention, there are plenty of other models I would have liked to give the fan label to, but they didn’t stick around long enough for that to happen.

      As for Calvin, the best way I can put it is he reminds me of Jake (minus the tatts). And imo, Jake is better. I’m just not as interested in Calvin as others are.

    • avatar jazz says:

      Nothin wrong with that. Everything isn’t for everybody. It’s just that, for me, Calvin never disappoints. He’s one of the few that I love equally as a top AND a bottom. Normally my narrow mind quickly assigns any given model to a preferred roll. For example, I will NEVER like Brady Jensen as a top. To me he should ALWAYS Bottom. Ethan should always top. But I think Jarek and Brandon should both be fully versatile. I absolutely love seeing Jarek’s long legs up in the air!

    • avatar Nick Minaj says:

      Yeah, I may not be a fan of Calvin’s, but I don’t roll my eyes when I see him show up in an update either (like we do with Jamie haha). Calvin definitely gives a good show in he’s scenes.

      I agree about Brady, him topping is crazy talk. He’s fucking beautiful to me though, from head to feet. I absolutely hate his hair since SC, but I can overlook that. I’m the opposite on Ethan, I much rather see him as a bottom. But with me, I don’t care if models are versatile as longs a they suck dick and get fucked, because that’s what I want to see guys do in porn. I agree about Brandon being versatile, but I think all tops need to be versatile, bottoms don’t with me. It may be a bit of a double standard but it is what it is. To bad Brady is SC history, I would have loved to see a Brandon and Brady/Jonah pairing happen.

    • avatar jazz says:

      Good point you raise. I just realized that I’m exactly the same. I would really like it if all my favorite tops were versatile, including Ethan. I just het that SC turned him into a bottom. Though, I guess it is quite possible that he just prefers to bottom. And don’t even get me started on Aiden from CF. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s hot that he bottoms, but he had bottomed in his last 4 or 5 updates it seems. And it looks like CF gave us a little interracial BB action on the PPV site today.

    • avatar elmtree says:

      I had to check out the PPV Update cuz i wasn’t sure who the minority model would be. I didn’t know Carter had returned. I’ll buy this vid to see a black dude creampie Dawson

    • avatar porndog says:

      @elmtree, I think we should all keep in mind how far ahead these scenes were produced. That goes for SC as well. For all we know, the BB scenes were shot as much as a year ago.

  18. avatar jinger says:

    I’m not into these two

  19. avatar Dixster9inch says:

    I think and will always believe that Paul is a dreamboat….I’d love to see him with his music group. He is just right! But, I want to see a cock in his butt and soon! Preferably, Pierce, the ex-Marine would be the right choice. He has an adequate penis for Paul’s first on-site cherry popping. And, the two of them would look damn good together. So, Sean….if you are reading this…uh, make it happen dude! And Paul, “I love you!”

  20. avatar jazz says:

    It’s official…SC is my FAVORITE site for sure! Please keep the hot updates cumming! More BB with Brandon, Calvin, and bring back Ethan, Jess, Kurt, and Abel!

  21. avatar dio says:

    so, aside from Paul, Brandon, and Calvin I guess only the really wonky lookin’ guys are into BB performances? TBH, I’ve been really let down with SC’s pair-ups these past few months. I just cannot get into a scene where only one of the guys is attractive (to me), and lately… SC’s been hooking-up good-looking models w/ random bagfaces. :-/

    • avatar jazz says:

      I’ve noticed that too. It would be awesome to see two equally attractive models paired together. I can think of a few I’d like to see. Brandon/Calvin, Ethan/Brandon, Abel/Calvin, Abel/Brandon, Jess/Brandon, Ethan/Jess….

    • avatar jazz says:

      And hopefully they can bring back that sexy Ricardo too!

  22. avatar chad says:

    Sean Cody is endorsing and encouraging the spread of AIDS with this Bareback crap. Shame on him.

    • avatar DaddyYankee says:

      Let me know: if you see two guys having sex without condom are you persuaded to do the same?

    • avatar jazz says:

      Does a gun shop owner endorse murder? Just wondering…

    • avatar MikeB says:

      Every time I see this pro and con argument, I keep wanting to mention Derek Chambers. He was in the testing programs and thought he was safe too. It’s a gamble that all these guys are paid for. Google the name and watch his interviews.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      chad I always insist in safer sex practices to everyone in everyday real life sexual encounters. But this is show business. It’s for us to fully enjoy. Beside lots of so called straight guys similar to what SC hires don’t want to use condoms in real life. If they did they wouldn’t use condoms up a guys ass due to they simply don’t like condoms and besides they are not going to get the guy pregnant. It’s an open and shut case. Bareback spreads the beautiful visual impact of art, not AIDS.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Mike B read and watched the Derek Chambers video. However I feel he is trying to say he caught the AIDS from a gay full condom scene and all the straight work he did without condoms didn’t play a part in it. You know it all leads up to one thing he can deny it all he wants. he’s a bi performer. I am sure he is bi in real life. He has a full time girlfriend. He didn’t catch it on a studio set. He was most likely having sex off camera (cheating on his girl) every chance he got with girl and guys. Without test and without condoms. His story is not bullet proof by no means. Sad example. Still I wouldn’t wish a poz status on anyone.

    • avatar elmtree says:

      @Asswipe…when you say, “this is show business. Its for us to fully enjoy”, are you saying the only way for you to fully enjoy porn is for it to be bb? If so, why is that? I’m certainly not against bb but I don’t get how “bareback spreads the beautiful visual impact of art”. What does that even mean?

    • avatar elmtree says:

      And Asswipe, while its very true Derek C could have got AIDS from someone in his private life, why do you matter of factly say “he didn’t catch it on a studio set”? On what are you basing this statement? Just curious…

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Review the initial findings. They speak volumes, Plus I am sure the guy he had condom sex with had hiv or was on the track for hiv. But no cigar on this one. They just tried to baby him (or his girl) take the easy way out and take pressure off their own system. No as I said earlier in this post:
      “… covering up dicks with condoms. It made dicks look constricted and contorted while fucking an asshole. Plus it was like seeing a censored version of such a beautiful event that fucking ass is.
      For the record I watch porn for the hot guys.Not due to BB. However hot guys that are in a well produced scene that happens to be condom free equals a visual paradise of epic proportions.

    • avatar MikeB says:

      Yeah, there are holes in Chambers’ story. However, the foundation said that he did a scene with a known positive. Whose responsibility was it to tell him? His scene partner? The producer? Both sides are usually in it for a paycheck. I’m not passing judgment, but some of these guys are sweet and dumb. In some cases it’s just a tragedy waiting to happen.

    • avatar Ryder25 says:

      Barebacking is a form of Russian Roulette. It’s exciting when you win, but the odds are you will eventually lose– and when you lose you are totally screwed.

  23. avatar kinezo says:

    paul is adorable!!!

  24. avatar TheSagaOf says:

    SCORE:
    . Bareback
    . One-on-One action
    . Paul
    . Creampie

    WHAT COULD GO WRONG?

    • avatar asswipe says:

      I must admit I am with you on the “One-on-One action” But understandably these web based sites don’t have a a good amount of three-ways or four-ways or more-ways like the major studios do or did. Instead the web based studios give us a moutain of solos, something that really isn’t or wasn’t the backbone of traditional major studios. So I will say I am glad that subscribers to web based studios are finally getting some trios even if I personally am not interested in them. Some trios can be good if the production values are extraordinarily great. While others are flops and big messes, (not to say some duos are not messes as well) So I see both sides of the story. But yeah “One-on-One action” seems to be my favorite.

  25. avatar pubert says:

    Looks hot, but am I THE ONLY ONE who doesn’t see the appeal of a cum shot and would rather see him cum inside? Honestly, seeing his face as he gets off inside would be so much hotter than seeing him jerk off. Yet just about every single porn video makes the guy jerk off. Unless the load is absolutely amazing, the cum shot does nothing at all for me. Most of the time it’s a sorry disappointment anyway. Just stop with the cum shots and cum in the damn hole already.

    • avatar ahartford123 says:

      Yeah, when CF did that Cameron’s Birthday video where Cameron cums inside another guy I thought it was pretty hot. WIthout a condom, though, it can be hard to tell if the model really came or had to “fake it” because he messed up off-screen.

      I don’t mind condoms, and am actually worried that if SC goes all BB it loses its novelty. Eventually, everyone will go, “Eh. Just another BB scene, same as usual.”

      I feel that a great part of the appeal to BB is that it IS taboo. So when it’s done, it stands out. Same thing with Brandon. If he showed up every other week like Brodie, people would eventually tire of him.

      SC can’t keep escalating things forever. Eventually things can’t be pushed any further, so now would be a good time to tone it down a bit and then up the ante again later on.

    • avatar pubert says:

      I wouldn’t mind seeing all gay porn go BB. Hell, straight porn has always been like that, and gay porn actors are often interchangeable. They do straight as well, but when they do straight they don’t use condoms. WTF? Double standards?

      I’d still rather see someone cum inside an ass or mouth that jerk off. Even if they fake it (doubt a guy would have to fake it) who cares. I’d rather see that than some sorry, week dribbling cum shot that looks like snot dripping out of someone’s nose.

    • avatar TheSagaOf says:

      100% yes. I would have loved to see the ecstasy on Paul’s face as he climaxed inside Raymond. God. See someone quickly pull out, whack it, shoot, and stick it back in is a let down and sort of a boner killer.

    • avatar porndog says:

      @ahartford123, at the risk of dating myself, I began watching the old stuff (pre-condom) back when Falcon and Catalina were premier studios and then being disappointed somewhat when condoms became mainstream. So, yeah, BB may become passe after awhile. But that’s a good thing, because it’s a return to what I was used to seeing. Condoms became a reminder of AIDS and to a lesser degree sends a message that there’s something bad and deadly about gay sex; that we can’t enjoy what str8 people do. Again, BB doesn’t make a scene. It just seems more natural and doesn’t condemn.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      porndog, I just got to start watching adult titles in 2004. Between 2004 and 2008 it seemed that Falcon/Jocks/Mustang released almost everything old and new on DVD (thanks to pulse distribution) I took a great interest in learning all past releases. One thing I did notice during the pre-condom era dicks seemed more erect and firm after condoms were implemented (and I guess pre-Viagra) dicks for the most part seemed less hard with exceptions like Mike Branson and a few other. Then I guess Viagra came along years later and the dicks got hard again. I will not comment on Catalina since I researched them and only watched the major titles of theirs, so I cannot really make a conclusion on that studio.

    • avatar elmtree says:

      Mike Branson…yum! He was definitely one of my fav Falcon models. His cock was simple delicious looking, and always hard with a perfect slight curve. Damn, I’m getting hard thinking about it!

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      @elmtree YES YES to Mike Branson! Wish they could get more performers like that these days! Besides all his obvious physical appeals, he also had a great personality. Just seemed like a darn nice guy, which only heightened the appeal.

    • avatar I Am Jake says:

      I’m not going to have a heart attack the way some queens on here are because of non-condom scenes. I think, however, SC trying to imitate the cream pie stuff (taking it to the extend CM does and, of course, the sites like TIM and Macho Fucker, RFC, etc.) is unnecessary. Swallowing someone’s jizz is becoming more normalized in the mainstream studios and sites, pretty much everyone has done it. Even SC has done scenes where the guy swallowed several years back: seancody.com/page.php?frame=movie&movie=780

      I agree with the guys who said that hot sex is hot sex, whether they have condoms or not, and dull and tedious naked physical activity between two guys who would rather be fucking pussy (or something else) isn’t improved upon by the lack of a rubber.

      I DON’T agree that hot sex is even hotter if you take the rubber off. I’m not a fan of Damien Crosse, just doesn’t do it for me, but I think his scene with David Dirdam is one of the hottest in recent memory. It wouldn’t be “on fire” if they had taken the rubbers off….

    • avatar asswipe says:

      I Am Jake that Sean Cody scene you referenced “Blowing Daniel” was oral gold. The straight guy had the right attitude as well. I just loved his facial expressions at the beginning. It was like this is different yet cool and exciting. Then the scene just even better from there. Then the end was very intense, the direct from dick to mouth money shot was the kicker. SC GOLD. Yeah I wish instead of some of the solos we could get some of those type scenes. I know some will be great. Sean Cody really does some fine work.

  26. avatar Ryder25 says:

    I think the pro and con debate over barebacking is healthy, pardon the pun. These porn companies are going to do whatever it takes to make money. Today, that means barebacking. Many of us grew up in a time when safe sex was drilled into our heads from an early age, but that’s not the case for younger guys nowadays. Plus, young people have a tendency to think they’re invincible anyway. So if barebacking is going to proliferate in porn– as it looks like it is– then it’s up to us as a community to really make sure younger guys are educated about safe sex. And I don’t think the disclaimers Sean Cody and others are putting on their videos is enough. We have to do this as a community.

    • avatar Jake45 says:

      I completely agree with you! Barebacking is considered hot, condoms are not. The older generations now that’s only in fantasy but younger guys may not be able to make the distinction. Maybe after the LA city council votes on the condom law (for porn), we’ll see. Glad I’m not the only one who sees it this way.

    • avatar Czar says:

      Sadly, I think a fresh outbreak of new rapid HIV/AIDS cases is going to have to break out before people get their heads back on straight about the importance of condoms and safer-sex displays in gay porn. The younger generation is ignorant and the older generation is becoming jaded, and this barebacking fetish is the result. A once “respectable” porn site like Sean Cody selling out to the BB trend in order to compete is really disappointing. I never appreciated Men At Play at much as I do now.

    • avatar Ryder25 says:

      I hope that doesn’t happen, czar. I think people like you and I, who are safe sex advocates, need to accept what’s happening in porn and realize it’s not going to change– and instead of constantly fighting with people about it– we need to focus our attention on getting people to practice safe sex in their own lives. It’s okay to enjoy porn as long as we keep it in perspective: porn is fantasy and real life is different.

  27. avatar Mike says:

    I like Paul and I like Raymond (he’s certainly fuckable!). And more than just grunts.

  28. avatar lee-dong says:

    If SC goes bareback its a wrapp for other companies!

    • avatar jazz says:

      I’m hoping it will force the other companies to try harder. Let’s hope the increased competition will breed (pun intended) some really HOT scenes!

    • avatar TheSagaOf says:

      Oh ho ho
      I see what you did there.

      ;)

    • avatar I Am Jake says:

      Some companies (probably Randy Blue) will stick with rubbers and make a point of it, either very blatantly or otherwise, in their marketing and they will attract plenty of people on that basis.

      Personally, what SC is doing is mainly a response to CF Select and the pressure from the folks doing their financing for the last year or so, to squeeze out as much as possible.

  29. avatar jasoncrew01 says:

    While I appreciate the bareback, I fear it will impact the already scant cum eating SC has since I’m sure even fewer guys will take a load from a dick that’s just been in their ass bare than one with a condom.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      jasoncrew01 I know how you feel. “cum eating” is really how to end a scene with a bang. Yes it’s a standard formula, For good reason…it works every time. Your right about they will be a increase of anal cum shots/cream pies and nothings wrong with that. However some stars will prefer to show that ATM is a art form that they have mastered. Like him or not, Dawson at Corbin Fisher is a master of “cum eating” be it from ejaculations from oral only, to condoms pulled off before ejaculations, to ATM ejaculations. He’s got the skill and the passion. I think more guys will get into oral cum/cum eating. It’s just so beautiful when they do it at an expert level for the camera. (no sour faces, no misaimed semen)

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      Yep, the BB-scene producers often say oral cumshots don’t sell as well as anal. But I enjoy enthusiastic, well-depicted cum-eating, and if comments on this board and elsewhere are to believed plenty of others do too.

      I also feel a mix is the best way to go, with cum-eating, creampies, along with some kinky combo anal-oral including *real* ATM (no cuts or angle-changes, please!!) and even some felching once in awhile. Hey, if CF’s bi scenes can have guy A licking guy B’s cum out of the pussy, why not in the all-guy BB scenes, too?

      @ asswipe Couldn’t agree more with your last sentence.

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      Meant to add that I’m sure even with condoms lots of the cum-eating cums after a cut and some clean-up.

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      @ asswipe Meant to be more explicit about that your desire for “no sour faces, no misaimed semen” is a real hot-button issue for me when it comes to cum-eating. In straight porn the women gobble away at the cream like it’s a gift from heaven, while in gay porn it seems most decent-looking guys do everything in their power to MISS while feigning enthusiasm.

    • avatar asswipe says:

      Jonny Marzetti… Yeah I agree and it needs to change. Men need to give in to the natural instincts, and as you put it “…gobble away at the cream like it’s a gift from heaven…” As I said before “for the camera”

  30. avatar Daniel says:

    Raymond is sooo ugly.

  31. avatar cecedingbat says:

    A couple have said that the bareback pro/con discussion is healthy but I think it’s not really necessary. All I think is necessary is for any bareback video produced to have a message in the beginning reinforcing the idea that bareback sex is not something to be taken lightly and requires all parties to be honest and diligent about keeping a record of one’s sexual activity.

    • avatar jazz says:

      Well said and absolutely on point!

    • avatar Ryder25 says:

      I’m glad you are diligent, cecedingbat, but people like you are not my concern. I’m worried about the kids who don’t have your clear understanding about the importance of safe sex. In my own life, I have had sexual encounters with younger guys who have been educated about safe sex but they’re still willing to stray because they think I’m cute and I’ve told them I’m clean. That is NOT safe sex. That’s youthful stupidity. There are so many people, not just gay men, running around saying anything they need to say to get laid. Who knows what diseases they have?! And I think the proliferation of barebacking in porn does play a role in glamorizing unsafe sex for younger people. Therefore, I think the pro/con discussion is needed. If you don’t agree with me, feel free to say so. Or if my opinion offends you, then you don’t have to read it. But I will keep posting about safe sex on this blog.

    • avatar Nate says:

      Relying on porn to “teach” youth about sex is kind of silly in the first place. I too think a warning at the beginning is doing just fine in terms of any “obligation” to the community.

    • avatar Ryder25 says:

      @Nate. Yes, it would be silly to rely on porn to teach young people about healthy sex. But that’s not what I said. In fact, Sean Cody and the others are teaching people to have unhealthy sex. And as for disclaimers, they’re worthless and we all know it.

    • avatar cecedingbat says:

      @Ryder25

      “In my own life, I have had sexual encounters with younger guys who have been educated about safe sex but they’re still willing to stray because they think I’m cute and I’ve told them I’m clean”.

      Ok, but what does that have to do with SC or bareback porn? Porn also “glamorizes” promiscuity, racism, sexism, ageism, narcissism, drug abuse…..etc etc…IF we take it that seriously. Why didn’t YOU take the responsibly to tell them that just because you said that you had no STD’s that it wasn’t necessarily true? That even good-looking people have diseases? Why didn’t YOU take the responsibly to tell them that since there are so many people running around saying anything to get laid, to utilize condoms, testing, common sense, fidelity, even abstention, and in the mean time, question themselves and others on WHY there are so many people willing to say anything just to get laid. That sounds me like a problem in itself that a truly responsible would address rather than skipping it to attack its symptoms.

      “And as for disclaimers, they’re worthless and we all know it.”

      Um, we don’t all know it. They’re no more useless than seeing condoms in context of being teaching tools. Aside from those of us who notice because we’d rather see no condom, what makes you think anyone is gonna be paying attention to the condoms any more than to the message in the beginning? The models aren’t exactly saying: look at us, we have condoms on”.

    • avatar Nate says:

      Ok if the porn studios arent being relied on like you said. How can they then be accused of teaching unhealthy sex? That doesnt make sense. Either they are being relied on as teaching tools for some reason or they are not.

  32. avatar jlenconel says:

    I wont even watch this crap knowing its bareback. I think the younger generation’s attitude is absolutely disgusting. I guess this is what happens when you haven’t seen one of your friends die or be really sick from an incurable disease. I think there will eventually be a super strain of HlV but then it will be too late.

    • avatar Czar says:

      I agree. That SC is stooping to the level of Treasure Island Media is loathsome, and I agree that some sort of HIV resurgence is probably going to have to happen before these people stop being so jaded and stubborn in their desire to see models jeopardize their health for their own jack-off amusement. I really, really hope the mainstream media picks up on this disturbing trend of barebacking in gay porn and starts reporting on it.

    • avatar cecedingbat says:

      Irrational alarmists like you two are what’s wrong with the world. Conflating SeanCody with Treasure Island Media shows how disingenuous you are. The most TIM has ever addressed the topic of safety is to say that the models are allowed to sero-sort but ultimately that it’s their decision. SeanCody evidently has acknowledged that a great number of people really prefer bareback, and took preventative measures to try protecting the models. But that’s not good enough for you. You speak of “attitude”, but it seems that you are the one with an attitude problem. You come with pre-conceived notions and blanket generalizations about those “young” people and their oh so taboo desires. But instead of clutching your pearls and trying to change something that you can’t change, you could be offering some constructive criticism. And you can save your attempt at scapegoating bareback for a new strain of HIV because anyone with intelligence knows that the practice of predicting epidemics is not exactly a simple 1 +1 =2 formula. So if you’re looking to get off on “I told you so”, guess again.

    • avatar jlenconel says:

      Oh fuck off cecingbat

    • avatar porndog says:

      ^^ such elevated discourse.

    • avatar Ryder25 says:

      @cecedingbat. Being concerned about the safety of barebacking is hardly being an irrational alarmist. Even you should be willing to concede that point. Anyway, I have enjoyed our debate. We both have strong opinions which is good. Peace (for now.)

  33. avatar gaisle says:

    its a choice guys same as you make your choice to be you…
    i choose to go BAREBACK…
    i choose to sign up at SEAN CODY…
    i choose to stop my subs at RANDY BLUE / CORBIN FISHER

  34. avatar hollydick says:

    Paul is damn so hot ! can’t wait to see him fucked by Brandon (or Jess…) :)

  35. avatar Southbay says:

    I wanna suck on Paul’s smooth balls so badly! I to am waiting for Paul to get fucked

    • avatar jazz says:

      I’m wondering why his balls were so hot that he had to put a cold water bottle on them in the BTS. Was it that all of Raymond’s ass hair caused too much heat friction? LOL

    • avatar Southbay says:

      Lol that had me curious too. I started cracking up. He’s too cute

  36. avatar Stephen88 says:

    Dah, it’s taking forever! When is Paul going to get fucked?

    • avatar darkthunder1983 says:

      Not sure but I hope he doesn’t become the new Brodie and then finally bottom for either an almost obscure SC model from the past or a bottom like Jamie even though I like Jamie.

  37. avatar VegasRich says:

    I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Raymond is amazingly hot to me but apparently there are a lot of Raymond haters here. Paul is a good performer but frankly those tattoos are annoying and distract from his looks.

  38. avatar AlfonsoR85 says:

    130 comments?? Wow, SC is definitely winning the battle. And since Brandon (one of the sexiest guys I’ve ever seen) everything’s on their side apparently.

    • avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

      There’s plenty enthusiasm of SC enthusiasm here for sure (including me, though not for this particular scene). But to be fair we need to remember that a lot of those 130 comments were posts debating barebacking in porn. It used to be like this when CF would have an African-American model. Someone would say they didn’t like the guy, which would then spark cries of racism and result in scores of posts from the ensuing debate.

  39. avatar Jonny Marzetti says:

    …oops, ignore the first “enthusiasm.” I’ll learn to proofread when Rick Perry gets a brain.

  40. avatar jlenconel says:

    It perplexes me that these boys would even AGREE to do bareback. I think Raymond is gorgeous, but would be wary of having sex with him now because he has done bareback on camera.

    And lets just say hypothetically that, after I watch this, I decide to go out and do bareback because these guys are doing it. I mean, why shouldn’t I be able to go condomless if other hot guys (hotter than me) are doing it. It can’t be that bad if these grown, sexy men are going bare can it? Coupled with everyone’s current attitude about condoms, I think it would be the “in” thing to just throw caution to the wind and go out and fuck some random stranger bareback. I mean, why not?

    • avatar cecedingbat says:

      So you wouldn’t have sex with him even if he used a condom with you because? What was that about “attitude”? And I see you continue to erroneously equate bareback sex with throwing caution out of the window. Seems to me there is something wrong with the ATTITUDE that the two are inherently exclusive. Positions like yours sound strikingly similar to abstinent only ideology.

    • avatar Czar says:

      “And I see you continue to erroneously equate bareback sex with throwing caution out of the window. “

      That’s exactly what it is. There is no caution in barebacking in porn. None of these dudes are in monogamous relationships with each other. For extra money, they’re playing Russian Roulette with their health just so spoiled/gluttonous masturbating viewers can get off on the danger they’re agreeing to. Sick and despicable.

    • avatar Czar says:

      “And I see you continue to erroneously equate bareback sex with throwing caution out of the window. ”
      —–
      That’s exactly what it is. There is no caution in barebacking in porn. None of these dudes are in monogamous relationships with each other. For extra money, they’re risking their health just so spoiled/gluttonous masturbating viewers can get off on the danger they’re agreeing to. Sick and despicable.

  41. avatar minusme123 says:

    This scene would have been better if the 2nd position lasted longer. The editing is bit too much also. but hey, Raymond’s in it so its good enough for me.

  42. avatar cecedingbat says:

    Uh, did you totally skip where they said they were tested using the most advanced testing available – something unfortunately not available to the general public? Sure, any one of them could have theoretically gotten infected during the 2-3 week window period, but if they are even getting the test performed, I am sure they are knowledgeable enough to know about the window period and disclose any information about their behavior that could alter the reliability of the results. And again, sure they could have been negligent in that regard, but I’m gonna take for granted that they did the right thing, especially considering that it’s not that difficult and if (like you say) they are motivated by money, they’re not gonna want to do anything to jeopardize it. If I’m wrong, and one or more of them turn out to be as self-destructive as “Mason”, then that would be terrible. However, that does not negate that pre-cautions were used, and in theory should work. We can rationalize that if a condom fails due to improper use that it does nothing to destroy its claim of being effective. Well the same principle applies.

    Having said all that, I really couldn’t care less if SC continues with bareback sex. All things being equal, I prefer bareback, but the formula used by SC and CF is just so-so to me…same stupid camera angles and sexual potions, same lack of genuine passion (few exceptions). So the bareback really doesn’t change that. I prefer the style of TIM minus the kink and clear carelessness about disease as evidenced by the common display of hazard tattoos.

Please Login or Create Free Account to Comment