ChaosMen: Tatum and Brant (aka Ash Riley) ‘Edge’

Brant & Tatum 'Edge' at ChaosMen

Brant & Tatum 'Edge' at ChaosMen

Brant & Tatum 'Edge' at ChaosMen

Brant & Tatum 'Edge' at ChaosMen

Brant & Tatum ‘Edge’ at ChaosMen.com

I have been tempted to call this video “Straight Edge” but I have never really marketed the site as “Straight” guys. I do refer/summarize the guys as straight if that is what they tell me what they identify as, but the “straight” I would be referring to would be that this Edge video plays straight though.

On occasion I have done Edge videos with no extra “fantasy” elements. Mostly because the guy is attracted to the idea of the blindfold, porn playing on the headphones, and I suppose even the binding of the hands allows them to give over responsibility for their actions. But they aren’t down for anything more interactive.

I created these videos as a way for them to do something “guy on guy” for a few moments, so they could see they wouldn’t explode and or their body would still respond. That is why I so rarely do these vids. They have to be a bit more adventurous then the average Serviced participant.

Now a couple times I have filmed an Edge video and during the edit process, the oral portion goes incredibly smoothly. I edit the fantasy elements then try to integrate them into the oral part. Many times the oral part stands well on it’s own. I have considered releasing a Director’s Cut or a “Straight Edge” video with just the sucking portion. It is often hot to just see someone take a dude from soft to cumming in under 12 minutes.

Then I question how a Straight Edge video would be different than a Serviced video. There IS a difference of course, but to maybe the casual viewer, it is the same exact thing with a little extra cloth and rope. Connoisseurs of adult themes realize the simple bondage really does add a separate spicy element.

I would love to say that Brant (aka Ash Riley) was willing to try the fantasy elements, but he really just thought the bondage part of the blow job would be easier. That isn’t the only reason that this particular scene is a Straight Edge video.

I figured we could try some easy fantasy things as we got going. Perhaps some light ass play, rimming, or kissing etc. Buuut we never got there.

What I didn’t count on was Brant being VERY turned on! Tatum has never done an Edge video, nor has he made anyone cum on his own. Apparently Tatum’s skills are better than I expected.

Brant almost cums once during this video, with Tatum’s great hand/mouth work, as well as the use of a FleshJack.

Tatum moves off quickly, then Brant gives him the go ahead to try again. It doesn’t take long before Brant is telling him to stop or he will bust.

Brant screws up his face with effort to not cum, and his dick just floats alone in space as he rotates himself in the chair. After about 30 seconds, both Tatum and I figure his near miss with ejaculating is going to pass, but then his cock just starts spurting and dripping cum.

Tatum quickly grabs hold and jerks the rest of the cum out, tonguing his load to get every last drop.

Well, after that, it was pretty much Game Over for Brant. I knew I didn’t get a very good cumshot, so we did try to see if there was another load in there, (there wasn’t). I figured I at least had all the cameras aimed at him when he shot his nut.

So this is Straight Edge video, complete with a hands-free cumshot!

Watch Brant & Tatum ‘Edge’ at ChaosMen.com

Watch Brant & Tatum ‘Edge’ at ChaosMen.com

litper says:

time to rename it to “gay edge”. “Straight” is so last century…

moondoggy says:

“Brant screws up his face with effort to not cum, and his dick just floats alone in space as he rotates himself in the chair. After about 30 seconds, both Tatum and I figure his near miss with ejaculating is going to pass, but then his cock just starts spurting and dripping cum.”

The description is hot (some of it, anyway, and for the first time ever), but it sounds like poor camerawork will cause fans to miss what to me was the hottest possible outcome for a non-fuck scene. When a man is strapped to a chair, there is absolutely no valid excuse for the camera missing the cumshot.

manu says:

What a waste!! Tatum should have teased him with his hot furry ass!!

dio says:

call me when the Brent/Delaney ‘gingerfest’ or whatever Bry wished for comes off.

jinger says:

Two of the most disgusting porn models I’ve ever seen.

FeydRautha says:

Disgusting, really? I think there are things to like about Brant…

He’s got a nice body, his dick stays hard, no obtrusive tattoos, ginger pubes*… I mean, that Kelso – that’s gross, right there.

*That’s a bit of a personal thing for me. The first erect penis I ever saw was hooked up to this red-headed guy with really bushy pubes (it was in a straight porn magazine unfortunately). I’ve had a thing for them ever since.

FeydRautha says:

This is what gets me: why would you hire someone without knowing they’ll be able to perform?? You fly these guys in (well, some of them apparently), pay them however much to get them on camera to jerk off or whatever, pay for their STD and HIV testing (I know this is only a servicing vid, but I’d have insisted on it if I were Tatum – HIV might not survive very long outside of the body, but there’s still gonorrhea, chlamydia, herpes, etc. to worry about), pay for the other model/servicer to be there – and you still don’t know if they’ll be able to deliver the goods?!

litper says:

true, isn’t it easier to find a horny gay guys on some hookup site nearby, than search the country for last remaining closet cases with fucked up sexuality. Or is CM hq in the middle of Antarctica?

Tatum says:

I think the idea is it’s supposed to be a fantasy thing. Obviously it’s not everyone’s thing, and maybe not yours, but I was under the impression it is a fantasy for a lot of gay guys to seduce or hook up with a straight guy, or bi-curious guy. One of my best friends is gay and when I started escorting he told me I should tell my clients I’m bi-curious as that would excite them. I’d say I was bi-curious when I started, now I can pretty freely admit to being sorta bi. 75/25 in favor of women. I think deep down all the guys who do g4p have to be at least a little bi or curious.

PornJock says:

Hands-free cumming sounds exciting and intense. If I ever subscribe to CM again I would look that moment up.

Jonny Marzetti says:

Cumming without stimulation by a hand, mouth, anus or whatever makes for a great visual in porn, even though it ironically also makes the orgasm less pleasurable.

Douginsj says:

I actually find these blindfolded hands tied scenarios kinda stupid.

moondoggy says:

They aren’t inherently stupid, IMO, but they are profoundly stupidly executed, just as the glory hole scenes are stupidly executed. If you see the guy walking over to you with a blindfold, it completely defeats the purpose of wearing the blindfold in the first place. If Tatum is the one putting on Brant’s blindfold, that should be edited out of the scene, but Bryan doesn’t seem to understand that.

@Feyd and litper, I think the question is not whether or not Bryan can find people to perform more competently (though I’m not convinced performance is the problem here), but why he is so invested in a certain concept of beauty that fetishizes such an aloof attitude toward the very thing they have been hired to do. That’s the one thing that I think now makes Corbin Fisher better. Even when the models claim to be straight (like Dawson and I think Connor?), they show a spectacular level of enthusiasm toward fucking AND getting fucked by other men, and that is why their insistence on their own straightness never offends me or intrudes on my fantasy.

Jonny Marzetti says:

+2, although if the guys are pornworthy and there is a good, cum-swallowing BJ — or better yet some “limits stretching” (real or purported) — it’s still hot.

Jonny Marzetti says:

Oops, should have been +1.

Jonny Marzetti says:

@moondoggy Re your comments re CF, are you implying — by exclusion — that Sean Cody guys who are supposedly straight don’t show a similar enthusiasm for fucking?

moondoggy says:

It’s not that I was deliberately maligning SC. I find it hard to generalize about them because they seem to have so many more guys and on average each guy has been in fewer movies. Plus I’m judging both companies by an extremely limited number of movies. When I think CF, I think Dawson, Connor, Aiden, and a few others, and all three of them seem almost to have made sex with men their religion. I guess they also seem a little more convincing, whereas sometimes with Sean Cody it’s a little more “ohyeahohyeahohyeah” as opposed to letting their real passion determine how much they moan and groan.

But no question both sites involve more emotion than CM.

FeydRautha says:

“That’s the one thing that I think now makes Corbin Fisher better. Even when the models claim to be straight (like Dawson and I think Connor?), they show a spectacular level of enthusiasm toward fucking AND getting fucked by other men, and that is why their insistence on their own straightness never offends me or intrudes on my fantasy.”

And, personally, I find that to be even more offensive. You turn into a pile of quivering gooseflesh and cum multiple times whenever there’s a dick in your ass… but yeah, YOU’RE TOTALLY STRAIGHT. And don’t give me that “even straight men can find pleasure in getting fucked/having their prostate stimulated.” Sure they can – if it’s a woman doing it.

moondoggy says:

Feyd, I’ve noticed that about you and it has given me food for thought each time you raise the objection. But I just don’t feel that way about it. Let’s consider all of the men who genuinely are straight in the world, and then arrange them from most homophobic to least. Seriously, where would you place a guy who has a girlfriend but who is less inhibited about gay sex than *I* am? I can make a list of things Dawson has done that I never would — multiple loads, rimming, double penetration … I don’t remember if he has done ATM, but if that was a question on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, I’d put my money on “yes.”

Now let’s think of all the guys in the world who are genuinely gay and have internalized homophobia. Roy Cohn, J. Edgar Hoover, Ed Koch(?), Tom Cruise(?) … Again, I’m thinking that the “I’m really straight” star of a gay bareback site, the one who looks like he CAN’T WAIT to have another cock in his ass, is probably going to rank pretty low. At least that’s how I view it. There are a lot stronger forms of denial than being the cum dump in a 9-guy orgy.

FeydRautha says:

@moondoggy

I’m really struggling to come up with a response to your last comment.

A “genuinely straight” guy DOES NOT enjoy having sex with men. No if’s, and’s, or but’s. As for inhibitions… maybe AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, Dawson simply doesn’t give a fuck anymore – he’s gotten just that depraved.

As I see it, one of two things is happening here. Either Dawson does actually enjoy sexing dudes but he insists he’s straight – that’s homophobic IMO. Maybe mildly so IYO, but homophobic all the same. OR Dawson is faking it (with ED meds, str8 porn, etc.) and Corbin Fisher is selling us pantomimed gay sex acts performed by straight men (why? because they’re so much hotter?) – also homophobic.

litper says:

I agree with you Feyd. But I also understand what moondoggy means. I think Tom Cruise and Dawson are really in different situation. Tom has his multimillion dollar international superstar career at risk while Dawson is taking loads from guys on some gay porn site yet he keeps on saying that homophobic shit. I mean what would he loose if he admitted his bisexuality? That would hurt only his homophobic mind where a real man can’t be gay.

moondoggy says:

I think that it is possible for someone to define their sexual orientation by, let’s say, romantic attraction rather than just by what can bring them off. I think it’s possible that there are horndogs out there in the world who can get hard on a dime, who can appreciate the attractiveness of men and women, but who genuinely prefer women, and if Connor or Dawson says that’s where his heart is, I don’t see a reason to doubt him. If you consider that pantomiming, then that’s where you and I would begin to agree, but as for “why hire someone like that,” my answer is because they look DAMN good doing it, and is a better performer than many, many, many guys working there or anywhere else. Where we would agree even more is on the fact that it seems like Corbin Fisher and other sites could at least hire more guys who identify as openly gay.

Okay, I’m done on this thread because I don’t think anyone but us is still reading it, and because when I came back to see if I had a reply, I couldn’t even remember where we were having this conversation.