Comments on: ChaosMen: Elliott & Nash (Raw)

By: lovelivelife

lovelivelife — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:26:51 +0000

you guys really should get over yourselves. This is site and if he wants to have raw videos he can and these guys are definitely not being taken advantage of….They know exactly what there doing. WHY dont you guys complain when Corbin Fisher has raw straight videos…can you say double standard.

PS I dont agree with raw sex but its fucking porn they know the risk they take

By: DesertDougAz

DesertDougAz — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:09:05 +0000

In reply to Prancer. could not agree more Prancer

By: DesertDougAz

DesertDougAz — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:56:04 +0000

In reply to Prancer.

Bryan has reduced this site to it’s lowest common denominator (sex for cash). Difficult to even imagine how these guys are str8 and then run such a foolish risk. I left the site because this. He had a good site going but is losing it.

Nash is one hot little fucker and belongs elsewhere.

Bryan, get a clue! You will never get another dime from me.

Apparently gay for pay guys need a clue too.

By: James

James — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:50:11 +0000

The comments about the new trend in bareback videos are right on point. The companies producing them appear to believe that barebacking is vastly hotter and more exciting than videos where condoms are used, particularly where the scenes end with cum tasting or eating. One would think that, after all of these years of being indoctrinated about the dangers of contracting HIV through unprotected sex, individuals and producers would take every reasonable precaution. But, as another writer has posted, it seems that money trumps safety.

By: ThomT

ThomT — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:39:17 +0000

Glad to see all the complaints about CM and Jake doing mostly raw videos. This isn’t a health concern to them it’s a business decision – they simply don’t care as long as the money keeps coming in. The recession has hit the porn industry just as hard as it’s hit everywhere else and subscriptions to porn sites are way way down and the owners seem willing to do whatever it takes to keep the monthly fees rolling in and in the case of at least these two sites they have chosen to go with bareback sex and are obviously paying the models sufficiently to get them to agree to the risky behavior. And I don’t believe for a minute that they are all being tested and even if they are there is no test that is 100% accurate either positive or negative. I cancelled my subscription to CM several months ago for financial reasons but would have left anyway once they started all the barebacking.

By: Established One

Established One — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:49:01 +0000

Meh…I’ll pass on this one. I guess RAW is now a sign of the times.

By: brad323

brad323 — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:34:29 +0000

I agree with the others. Elliot is not hot enough for Nash. And I refuse to rejoin Chaosmen as long as they put these kids’ health in danger. It is completely unnecessary and irresponsible.

By: elmtree

elmtree — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:02:13 +0000

Its kinda redundant for Chaos to put “Raw” at the end of every video title. At this point its pretty much a given. Nash is without a doubt the best thing Chaos has going. And I agree with you Prancer, Nash deserves better than Elliott.

By: Josh S

Josh S — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:17:41 +0000

In reply to Prancer.

I agree with you totally. All the money and hot sex in the world couldn’t get me to go bareback. It’s so not worth spending the rest of your life with HIV/AIDS. But, if Nash and all these other stupid ass dudes wanna play by Chaosmen’s new rules, then by all means, let them. Trust me, they will pay the ultimate price for being stupid.

Chaosmen used to be a cool site until all the bareback BS started. Every clip is now “RAW”. Why the sudden change??

By: Prancer

Prancer — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:56:37 +0000

I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again Nash is way too hot for this site, and that thing he’s sticking his bare dick in is not at all worth it.