<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ActiveDuty: Brock Tops Jimmy (Bareback)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/</link>
	<description>Gay Porn Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Orion Hunter		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hopefully these pics don&#039;t really do these guys or this scene any justice.  From what I can see here, they aren&#039;t unattractive but these shots/caps certainly aren&#039;t doing them any real favors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully these pics don&#8217;t really do these guys or this scene any justice.  From what I can see here, they aren&#8217;t unattractive but these shots/caps certainly aren&#8217;t doing them any real favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GreenGrass		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GreenGrass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For me the attraction to AD had more been about hot military guys getting it on with no inhibitions.  There was normally an instigator that things going and then all hell would break loose (in a good way.)  Somewhere along the way, AD has lost track of ALL of it&#039;s best performers and now stumbles on these guys that are lackluster and that can&#039;t deliver the heat like some of the other guys used to do.

I can tell that in last couple of months AD has tried but it just looks like the magic is gone.   AD has never been consistent, but this stretch of poor quality, guys with not much sex appeal and unimagniative scenes is just too hard to overlook.

It&#039;s really sad to see the stuff that AD used to deliver and what they are putting out now.  I guess it&#039;s karma on how they manipulated some of the controversies over the years.  Karma, is indeed a bitch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the attraction to AD had more been about hot military guys getting it on with no inhibitions.  There was normally an instigator that things going and then all hell would break loose (in a good way.)  Somewhere along the way, AD has lost track of ALL of it&#8217;s best performers and now stumbles on these guys that are lackluster and that can&#8217;t deliver the heat like some of the other guys used to do.</p>
<p>I can tell that in last couple of months AD has tried but it just looks like the magic is gone.   AD has never been consistent, but this stretch of poor quality, guys with not much sex appeal and unimagniative scenes is just too hard to overlook.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really sad to see the stuff that AD used to deliver and what they are putting out now.  I guess it&#8217;s karma on how they manipulated some of the controversies over the years.  Karma, is indeed a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388628</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388584&quot;&gt;Bradster&lt;/a&gt;.

I completely disagree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388584">Bradster</a>.</p>
<p>I completely disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388542&quot;&gt;Tom&lt;/a&gt;.

Well it s not a completely bad scene in my opinion because the guys are very cute and interesting but there is a lot missing. Cinematography is simply  stiff. Tedious angles for an unspectacular sex position. The penetration can be filmed so vividly and thrilling but here it is simply a waste. Too bad cause the bottom has one meaty tremendously hot butt. AD could do better. It s not too difficult to give some spice to a sexscene. lol ... sadly it can not really be called art what they are doing... maybe tripod-art like u said ;-) I can t imagine a scene where I like everything. Not only regarding AD ... it is generally difficult to satisfy men who watch a lot of porn. Maybe we are simply too spoilt but in fact I think the scene is weak even for AD standards. My expectations for a potential fucking scene were too high.They should try it again with those too guys. I think they deliver a great pairing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388542">Tom</a>.</p>
<p>Well it s not a completely bad scene in my opinion because the guys are very cute and interesting but there is a lot missing. Cinematography is simply  stiff. Tedious angles for an unspectacular sex position. The penetration can be filmed so vividly and thrilling but here it is simply a waste. Too bad cause the bottom has one meaty tremendously hot butt. AD could do better. It s not too difficult to give some spice to a sexscene. lol &#8230; sadly it can not really be called art what they are doing&#8230; maybe tripod-art like u said ;-) I can t imagine a scene where I like everything. Not only regarding AD &#8230; it is generally difficult to satisfy men who watch a lot of porn. Maybe we are simply too spoilt but in fact I think the scene is weak even for AD standards. My expectations for a potential fucking scene were too high.They should try it again with those too guys. I think they deliver a great pairing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: moondoggy		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moondoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388542&quot;&gt;Tom&lt;/a&gt;.

Me too. I&#039;m alienated from the pack once again. I still want to see this scene, but I know AD, and they aren&#039;t skilled at much of anything. Sometimes it&#039;s like they just put the tripod in the room and show the guys where to fuck so that they stay in frame, and that&#039;s the extent of their &quot;art.&quot; Much like Jake Cruise, when they get something right, there&#039;s still usually something else wrong. But also like JC, sometimes they stumble onto a guy or a pairing that they can&#039;t bungle, and I won&#039;t be so bitchy as not to give them (or him) credit for those moments. 

Everybody&#039;s really hard on this one, but I&#039;m really hopeful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388542">Tom</a>.</p>
<p>Me too. I&#8217;m alienated from the pack once again. I still want to see this scene, but I know AD, and they aren&#8217;t skilled at much of anything. Sometimes it&#8217;s like they just put the tripod in the room and show the guys where to fuck so that they stay in frame, and that&#8217;s the extent of their &#8220;art.&#8221; Much like Jake Cruise, when they get something right, there&#8217;s still usually something else wrong. But also like JC, sometimes they stumble onto a guy or a pairing that they can&#8217;t bungle, and I won&#8217;t be so bitchy as not to give them (or him) credit for those moments. </p>
<p>Everybody&#8217;s really hard on this one, but I&#8217;m really hopeful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonny Marzetti		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Marzetti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nope.  The bottom doesn&#039;t cut it facially and the top doesn&#039;t cut it assily.  Call back when you manage to do a BB scene with cute guys, AD (and I know you have a few in the stable).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  The bottom doesn&#8217;t cut it facially and the top doesn&#8217;t cut it assily.  Call back when you manage to do a BB scene with cute guys, AD (and I know you have a few in the stable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bradster		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I honestly can&#039;t remember the last time AD had any hot newbies. These two are just pathetic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly can&#8217;t remember the last time AD had any hot newbies. These two are just pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TrixM92		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388582</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TrixM92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518&quot;&gt;dio&lt;/a&gt;.

But don&#039;t condoms have a higher failure rate during rough anal sex ? 
Its not that bareback makes the sex slow , cos in straight porn , chicks always get fucked raw in the ass and the guys aren&#039;t gentle .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518">dio</a>.</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t condoms have a higher failure rate during rough anal sex ?<br />
Its not that bareback makes the sex slow , cos in straight porn , chicks always get fucked raw in the ass and the guys aren&#8217;t gentle .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388527&quot;&gt;Sushi&lt;/a&gt;.

Two chubs fucking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388527">Sushi</a>.</p>
<p>Two chubs fucking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jag2power		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jag2power]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice closeups.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice closeups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: landreau		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[landreau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518&quot;&gt;dio&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m against barebacking of any kind, but wouldn&#039;t most people rather watch a hard, rigorous fuck than a gentle bareback fuck? Priorities, people!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518">dio</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m against barebacking of any kind, but wouldn&#8217;t most people rather watch a hard, rigorous fuck than a gentle bareback fuck? Priorities, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: landreau		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[landreau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jimmy is hot, but the top is, well, not. Also, Jimmy needs to be fucked with his ass in the air (like he just don&#039;t care). I mean, it&#039;s one of his best features -- and he&#039;s lying on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy is hot, but the top is, well, not. Also, Jimmy needs to be fucked with his ass in the air (like he just don&#8217;t care). I mean, it&#8217;s one of his best features &#8212; and he&#8217;s lying on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ChillPoint		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChillPoint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The crazy part is, I like Jimmy. Beefy, thick, and horny as hell. And I kinda figured he&#039;d be a bottom... but like everyone else has said, the sex just isn&#039;t matching up to the potential. Jimmy would probably do well on CM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crazy part is, I like Jimmy. Beefy, thick, and horny as hell. And I kinda figured he&#8217;d be a bottom&#8230; but like everyone else has said, the sex just isn&#8217;t matching up to the potential. Jimmy would probably do well on CM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388542</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would like that with doggystyle included and good closeups from behind. But the vid is too onedimensional. Sad thing cause I like both guys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like that with doggystyle included and good closeups from behind. But the vid is too onedimensional. Sad thing cause I like both guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dio		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388527&quot;&gt;Sushi&lt;/a&gt;.

drunken fuck = pretty much all AD action scenes, I think?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388527">Sushi</a>.</p>
<p>drunken fuck = pretty much all AD action scenes, I think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neobamboom		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neobamboom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The last active duty bareback video had brown lube coming out of the bottom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last active duty bareback video had brown lube coming out of the bottom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neobamboom		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neobamboom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518&quot;&gt;dio&lt;/a&gt;.

ChaosMen was great before it went bareback. Their videos featured REAL hard fucking, not like the post-bareback stuff were it&#039;s gentle prodding.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518">dio</a>.</p>
<p>ChaosMen was great before it went bareback. Their videos featured REAL hard fucking, not like the post-bareback stuff were it&#8217;s gentle prodding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sushi		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re both bloated and puffy looking.  Blah.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re both bloated and puffy looking.  Blah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dio		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2012/09/24/activeduty-brock-tops-jimmy-bareback/#comment-388518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=35752#comment-388518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[both are kinda &#039;cute&#039; but I&#039;m just not feeling it. As CM and studios before &#039;em have gone to prove: bareback just isn&#039;t enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both are kinda &#8216;cute&#8217; but I&#8217;m just not feeling it. As CM and studios before &#8217;em have gone to prove: bareback just isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
