Yada, yada, yada… I see you got the reminder about your reality grips, your attendance record is updated to reflect you’re not here everyday posting, then deflect to “your issues” and what not. Anyway, the WLBs always say what they want to say to justify they are rootin’ tootin’ mad to themselves (and others) which makes for an interesting social experiment in itself.

I totally understand your point of view though, Res1, cause I’ve commented on it a few times in the past. And surely will again, in the near future, like I’m doing now, and then “rawr…hsss…”!!!

@cameronhawks119 @flachowski Just because someone photographs you doesn’t mean you’re a model. I could take professional photos and say I am a model, doesn’t mean i am. What agency is he signed to? What magazine has he been in? Clearly he wasn’t successful enough to make a mark because he’s doing porn now. I don’t think Sean O’Pry had to do that. LOL

@cameronhawks119 I have a feeling that he will. Just wait and see :)

/// — Portions of this comment have been edited by the moderator — ///

@flachowski

another pictures of him
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1prwev07j1r8yfdqo1_500.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxc9tane8B1r4j6i4o1_500.jpg
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5c8bccyeo1r4j6i4o1_1280.png
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lzn0c9gmy21r5hedio1_500.jpg

Anyway, Tanner is so hot and i want him to do more.

Also, if I’m PAYING, I’m not “begging.” That’s *ridiculously* obvious. The concept of “beggars can’t be choosers” couldn’t possibly be more IRRELEVANT to porn critiques. We’re talking about erotic entertainment,. not real-life encounters. Why do you have so much trouble grasping that obvious distinction? Get a grip on reality.

Brandon and ???

where is Hudson?

like to see a return of Joshua soon

let’s focus on this scene

@Res1

“I’m sure more than half ( I’m being generous) of you don’t fit the perquisite for what you ask for and probably just as feminine, skinny, ugly, etc. Beggars can’t be choosers.”

How the commenter looks, and who they could or couldn’t attract, is supremely irrelevant to their opinions the quality of porn models. This ignorant and illogical train of thought, which unfortunately pops up occasionally, makes a comment like “you people must be fucking blind idiots to think this guy is hot/not hot” look like eminently intelligent discourse. It’s like saying “you have no right to criticize this restaurant’s food because you probably couldn’t even make a decent peanut butter sandwich.” Again, so illogical it’s almost mind boggling.

“I like a range of expressions in porn – including playfulness and full out joy.”

Agreed. A little levity/lightheartedness in porn or the bedroom (as long as you’re laughing WITH and not AT) is a good thing. [I haven’t watched this particular scene, so my comments are made generally and not specifically.]

RES

Sorry bud but your comment definitely doesn’t relate to me because I could personally give a rats ass if he’s gay/straight/bi. As long as he’s attractive, for the most part MASCULINE, and can deliver on screen, then I’m game. Doesn’t sound like a lot now does it?

As for what the people who are “complaining” look like IRL, that’s pretty irrelevant. ESPECIALLY when it comes to those that are paying for the product. The same applies to music, food, clothes etc. When you throw your money out there, you want something that’ll be worth said money. Sean Cody hasn’t been delivering this past year. MY opinion. Is it me? Hell yeah. I know some people like this shit but I sure as hell don’t.

One more thing…

“Then again, I don’t have some insatiable thirst like some of you guys who have an unrealistic idea of what a man should be.”

I don’t have some insatiable thirst of what a man SHOULD be either. In fact, I don’t care if a guy’s feminine, skinny, muscular. Its their life. It’s just that, like you and everyone else, I have my tastes.

@flachowski, what kind of effortless clocking? LOL

yeah, he certainly looks much better w/ the hair.

@Res1, referring to peeps as ‘beggers’ implies they are wanting something for nothing/FREE. Now, one would assume when discussing a subscription-based site’s content all participants in the conversation are/were paying/paid subscribers. (Who knows for sure, tho?) But, using that as a framework for your comment… you fail. Utterly.

that said, I notice you are absent when peeps are waxing joyous over what they feel is a ‘good’ update (rarely as that may be, in these awful times)… interesting! ;-P You only seem to show up with your same, trifling comments when you feel peeps are ‘complaining too much’ and use that as a context to dismiss their comments(s), and discredit ’em as someone that’s ‘OMGZ, so hard to please w/ unrealistic expectations!!!!!’ (standards… bah! Humbug!) or some bullshit… Really. It’s weird and transparent. Gather yourself up, dood.

First time bottoming on-screen, he needs to be properly fucked not a flip-flop and totally not one fucking position. This video is okay and I’m glad he bottomed.

@Res1 they happen to be models in real life. Tanner did editorial & advertising/commercial

I just posted another photo from his modeling work. Still waiting for admin’s approval and I won’t reveal his real name and please if any one of you know don’t post it here. Anyways, I’m glad someone like him doing gay porn