@Icarus – How are you so sure he’s uninterested and do you know people find that sexy too? Ever watched Japanese porn? :)

@shaman – Scraping the bottom of the barrel are we?

paris hilton is the most searched blonde doesn’t mean she’s doing something right lol plus no pornstar is famous for just being “passionate” they get rated by what they bring to the table. It’s you have a very refined taste when it comes to porn. But I can guarantee johnny will fade away once those boyish looks cease to exist unless he goes buff or cut.

Just look at his face in the first picture.. He’s so uninterested and he has two men’s cocks shoved up his ass, it looks like he’s just waiting for it to be over. Agree 100% he needs to go away!

No I am Johnny himself!

^ oh ho ho but The Sword is THE MOST ANNOYING site ever!

And it’s not just me who’s saying it O_O

@slipperyslope – I love passionate sex too but there are certain actors that are better at it for sure but the ones who do not star in those scenes doesn’t mean that they are worse than the ones who do either.

How many ‘passionate’ stars (in your opinion that is) are as famous as Johnny Rapid or Paddy O’Brian or Cody Cummings or Rafel Alencar who all star in mostly rough/downright dirty sex?

@baz – I don’t only find bigger tops/smaller bottoms sexy.

I love twink bottom fucking a muscle top scenario too but it has to be done right and till now I’ve only seen Bareback Attack doing it but even that site is a hit n miss. Maybe I’m just more picky than the rest of you guys.

Again this ‘mixing of performance’ you are talking about does not work that much in gay porn but that’s just me. Each pornstar is known for a certain appeal and people watch their scenes for it. Also Johnny is at Men so they mix it all the time with the different storylines which other sites lack.

But the facts are facts – you can diss at Johnny here all you want but he is still the most searched gay pornstar – so he must be doing something right.

carey calling anything “the most annoying EVER” is pretty darn funny.

” If simply being attractive was all that’s needed, I’d have a subscription to NDS who coast on hot guys who churn out dead scenes.” Preach, brother!!! A site that absolutely infuriates me is BigDaddy/RubHim. They have guys who are SCORCHING hot, but every single scene is the same, goddam robotic sex. They never kiss, they never cum anywhere but on the chest, and then they never even touch it. It’s the most passionless sex I’ve ever seen.

But lord-a-mighty, are the guys good looking! lol…

@carey579 paint him whatever color you want lol but the fact of the mater is he is as dull as a dish washer when compared to other performers. I’m not gonna bother comparing and contrasting since we all have different strokes but johnny is nothing but a young boyish looking guy who can put his ass in the air and allow multiple people to pounce. Lots of fans like him for just that and it sells but there are better options.

Carey, I get the feeling you are either the president on Johnny’s fan club, Johnny’s manager or Johnny himself. You constantly bring up the fact (?) that Johnny is the most searched porn star. I’m beginning to think you are the one doing all the Johnny searches! Hmmmm, that would explain a lot, lol.

I said my idea of a bottom was not FIXED. From your comments, I gather you’re only interested in bigger guys topping smaller twinky guys, whereas my opinion of bottoms is not limited to whether they are twinky and smaller than the guy topping them.

“The are pornstars not actors – as long as they’re sexy and appeal to you it doesn’t matter that much what their performance is and even if it does what makes you certain that one way of performance is better than the other?”

It matters to me because for me the best porn performers are those who mix it up and don’t just do more or less the exact same thing ala Rapid. And simply being attractive isn’t worth anything if they they don’t give a decent performance. If simply being attractive was all that’s needed, I’d have a subscription to NDS who coast on hot guys who churn out dead scenes.

As for comparing performances, I suppose that’s subjective. I find Rapid’s copy and paste bottoming performances to be less appealing than guys who get more engaged and raise the overall energy of the scene (like Jaxson). If you like Johnny xeroxing the same performance again and again, then go ahead and do so. I do not.

And your distaste for Jaxson is equivalent to mine for Rapid, so we can agree to disagree on that.

@Dustin – I had no idea about the straight porn company owning MEN (I did feel MEN’s scenes were similar to straight porn – sometimes it works/sometimes doesn’t) but it does not matter.

That most searched result was published by TheSword (the most annoying gay porn blog EVER) who hates Johnny so I’m guessing it’s actually legit.

You look at sites like those and even mainstream gay sites like Queerty – they never promote him – they’re always promoting ‘passionate performers’ like Colby Keller and sites like CockyBoys and yet they never have a fan following like Johnny or Paddy or even Cody Cummings – the ones they complain of being bad performers.

(sorry I hit the Enter button)

why MEN hired Jaxon?

He’s neither handsome with that devil like face and macho as a top neither an appealing bottom again with that face.

@baz – You clearly have a clear idea about how a bottom should be having written two paragraphs about it!

The are pornstars not actors – as long as they’re sexy and appeal to you it doesn’t matter that much what their performance is and even if it does what makes you certain that one way of performance is better than the other?

If it was then that Jaxton would be one of the most searched instead of Johnny wouldn’t he? I don’t even understand why M

You believe Johnny is ‘100% straight’??

You’re the one I feel bad for :C

I don’t have a fixed idea of what a bottom in gay porn should be. Twinky, burly, hairy, as along as I find a performer attractive, I would want to see them partaking of everything in the gay porn repertoire (except bareback of course). I find Rapid, boring and non-responsive and of all the scenes I’ve seen him in, the tops were the draw for me (as Dustin succinctly stated below – he is the gay porn equivalent of tofu). And even if I were a twink bottom fan, there’s more than a few better twink bottom performers who do a better job that Rapid’s lather, rape, repeat performances.

As for Jaxton being a better bottom, watch any scene in which he bottoms. He’s more engaged, doesn’t make the RapidRapeFace and looks way better getting fucked. In fact, watch that Something About Johnny scene in which Jaxton not only out-bottommed Rapid effortlessly, but basically stole the show from the tops too.

I totally understand Johnny’s appeal, but watching him on Men.com is like watching a choice fillet being ground up and served as hamburger…

@carey579. Men.com is owned by MindGeek, which is currently the largest straight porn conglomerate in the US and Europe. Rapid’s name is going to come up a lot due to heavy marketing (which MindGeek excels at) and that he’s the most prolific performer for MGs one-update-a-day, multi-portaled, gay porn site.

Yes, Johnny Rapid has an appeal, but he’s not THAT stellar of a performer so there’s got to be someone going to bat for him behind the scenes. Johnny Rapid is Men.com’s go-to bottom boy, though from what I’ve seen his scenes are only as good as the guy topping him. The kid is like porn tofu.

If you like twinks that can be thrown in with many types of guys, there are better ones out there that can deliver better performances. Andy Taylor and Ian Levine come to mind.