lol I despair for you slipperyslope if you think THAT’S ‘SCIENCE’ O_O

Oh I’m so enlightened thank you very much guys. From now on I’m going to hate on all the ‘plastic/cookie cutter/Ken dolls/downright sexy/classically good looking’ men of the world.

And start worshipping ‘au naturale/unconventional/hairy/bearded/weird without a beard/effeminate’ wannabe alpha studs whose attractiveness you have to understand by reading long paragraphs from his like minded people -__-

Thank you @slipperyslope for enlightening @carey579.

It’s cool to not like him, but futile to try to understand ones attraction to another.

@carey, I say this in all seriousness and not trying to be mean, but maybe you will find that you are not attracted to many people, who the majority of people are. Some guys–like me–tend to find a wide range of guys attractive. Some guys, are far more precise in their “type”, therefore, it might be difficult to see why others don’t get you and your precision when it comes to looks.

carey you’re high-LAR-i-ous!!!! or maybe just high, lol…..

It’s cool if Colby’s not your thing. Lord knows I see gushing comment after gushing comment after some of the models and I just scratch my head, but there are certain ‘objective’ qualifications about what is universally considered attractive. I guara-damn-tee you that if you showed a picture of Colby Keller naked to 100 people (50 men/50 women) and said, “Rate him on a scale of 1-10, a vast majority would say he is attractive (7+) with a good body (8). That’s just science, lol… And look- there’s a difference between saying “I’m attracted to him” and “I think he is attractive.”

And Colby was never positioned as an ‘Alpha Stud’ like Paddy or Abe. Like I said- he’s always been versatile. EJ’s right as well- if a performer gets stuck in a box, they can easily become boring to watch. Dato Foland, Damien Crosse, Vander- these are totally masculine guys that do EVERYTHING and look like they’re into it for the sex, not the money. And for me- Colby is on that list.

Have you looked at Colby lately? He has gotten a lot more ripped than he was at one point. The vascularity/veiny look indicates very low body fat and he’s definitely got abs to be proud of. Some people may prefer more tan but I find his white skin very appealing. And while a few people for some reason need their men to fit into neat “top-only” or “bottom-only” boxes, I think it’s a heck of a lot more fun to have a versatile man in my bedroom. Look at Tim Kruger’s supremely boring “Tim Tales” site. Tim does one thing very well, but week after week he does only that same one thing over and over. Tim’s site has become completely tiresome because every clip is a carbon copy of the previous one. Guys who can mix it up a bit are bound to be more interesting to watch.

Handsome face – Where?
It’s covered in that furry balaclava and without it he’s the quintessential – ‘weird without a beard’!

Body – Again pasty, hairy and not enough muscles/proportioned to be an alpha stud like Abe/Brandon/Paddy etc.

Performance – I seriously cannot take a bearded effeminate guy as a top in one scene and then as a total bottom slut in another!

@slipperyslope +1 Well said. The list of virtues goes on and on

It does, but this is carey you’re talking to. Logic does not apply.

Handsome face, muscular body without looking ‘roided up, naturally hairy but not covered in carpet, beautiful cock, delicious ass, versatile, passionate, GAY… I mean, the list goes on and on, doesn’t it?

Hipster longevity? (Just kidding — I think Colby’s alright. A little overused, but fine with me.)