<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sketchy Sex: Cum Inside 2 (Bareback)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/</link>
	<description>Gay Porn Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 17:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: moondoggy		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moondoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 01:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=56581#comment-481631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481580&quot;&gt;jazz&lt;/a&gt;.

I do too, but they aren&#039;t consistently good. It&#039;s more like they consistently have potential, and just when you want to ignore them, they throw something hot at you. Even when they are using people you recognize (in this case, that looks like Ricky from CM topping in the first pic?), you can almost buy their fantasy premise. Just the fact that they even have a premise makes them more interesting to me than the sites that don&#039;t even pretend the sex is anything other than arranged. 

I prefer FX to SS just because the poor camerawork is not quite this poor at the parent site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481580">jazz</a>.</p>
<p>I do too, but they aren&#8217;t consistently good. It&#8217;s more like they consistently have potential, and just when you want to ignore them, they throw something hot at you. Even when they are using people you recognize (in this case, that looks like Ricky from CM topping in the first pic?), you can almost buy their fantasy premise. Just the fact that they even have a premise makes them more interesting to me than the sites that don&#8217;t even pretend the sex is anything other than arranged. </p>
<p>I prefer FX to SS just because the poor camerawork is not quite this poor at the parent site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonny Marzetti		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Marzetti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=56581#comment-481622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481585&quot;&gt;Sushi&lt;/a&gt;.

Exactly.  Even when they have a good scene -- and this one does seem just right for one of my &quot;sleazy porn&quot; moods -- the video quality really sucks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481585">Sushi</a>.</p>
<p>Exactly.  Even when they have a good scene &#8212; and this one does seem just right for one of my &#8220;sleazy porn&#8221; moods &#8212; the video quality really sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sushi		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=56581#comment-481596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481590&quot;&gt;boiznightout&lt;/a&gt;.

FraternityX is just gross.  Nothing hot about it at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481590">boiznightout</a>.</p>
<p>FraternityX is just gross.  Nothing hot about it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sushi		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481585</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=56581#comment-481585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are the real videos this dark and out of focus? It&#039;s like 70&#039;s porn recreated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the real videos this dark and out of focus? It&#8217;s like 70&#8217;s porn recreated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jazz		</title>
		<link>https://www.waybig.com/blog/2014/07/31/sketchy-sex-cum-inside-2-bareback/#comment-481580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jazz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waybig.com/blog/?p=56581#comment-481580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This site definitely has THE RIGHT name, but for some reason I like some of their scenes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site definitely has THE RIGHT name, but for some reason I like some of their scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
