He was an excellent performer. Another one ChaosMen lost to Corbin Fisher.

Rylan Knox.

What model killed himself this time?

What was Josh trying to do? I know former Corbin Fisher alumnus and site-jumper Kurt Wild has his own photography business.

That’s the same as Bel Ami. Lukas Ridgeston, Johan Paulik and that camera guy who’s always there (I have totally forgotten his name now but he’s the bald one with the goatee and was super fine in his younger days) work for BA behind-the-scenes. Roman Chaykin did at one point and so did Sebastien Bonnet and Luke Hamill.

I love Derek. I was just thinking about him the other day. Miss that lovable Eurasian bastard.

part of the reason Corbin Fisher is just so bad now.

1. I’m just going by what I see… mechanical, passionless sex.

2. Oh, I wasn’t limiting myself to Mr. Gibson. There’s Messrs. Ockert, Ostler, Sirard, Burns…

3. There were other people in those scenes, too. (And I didn’t see the Vadim scene actually; the preview was enough.)

1. If that’s what you choose to believe.

2. Jason doesn’t strike me as a “stupid old gay man.” If he wanted to hire these guys I’m sure he did so of his own volition.

3. If people didn’t notice it until you pointed it out, how are you being helpful? You have an issue with “straight” guys, but you still watch them in scenes. You talked about Armani’s last vid. In the BSB post you talked about Vadim’s last vid. Clearly your outrage only goes so far.

1. Good. No intimacy in G4P porn. Glad that’s cleared up. LOL!

2. Is it wrong to think inveigling (there’s another one for ya) money/benefits out of stupid old gay men is a little unseemly?

3. Some people (I’d argue most) don’t want to see pussy mags in their GAY PORN. I thought I was being helpful by pointing it out. :/

1. I didn’t realize I needed to define my use of the word intimacy, given the context of what I was explaining. I wrote intimacy in terms of sexual intercourse. I wasn’t talking about kissing and cuddling and gazing lovingly into your partner’s eyes.

2. You used words like “finagled” and “insinuated” to make it seem like they were doing something unseemly.

3. It’s not a big deal, to most people. But you always have to make it a topic of conversation. Instead of talking about the merits of a scene, you have to interject with “So and so is straight. This model uses TriMix. Look at the straight porn playing in the corner.” Who watches a scene and does screen by screen grabs looking for titty mags hidden by a pillow? Who clicks on a post about a bi scene and then complains about the presence of a vagina. It’s all a bit much. If something offends you so much you don’t keep referencing it. You ignore it and move on to the next thing.

1. You were the one to introduce intimacy with “who you become intimate with (is a choice).” These G4P performers aren’t choosing to be intimate with anyone. They’re bedding down with another guy just like they might do with a dog, or a sheep, or a pair of sofa cushions…

2. I said the Corbin Fisher lifers have trouble getting regular jobs because they risk their GAY porn work being exposed.

3. Putting them on blast? I am supposed to keep their orientation a secret or something? It shouldn’t be a big deal to point out that someone is straight or to correct a misapprehension about a person.

Who’s stopping you from expressing your opinion? That’s not the issue. The issue is turning everything into an “Us vs. Them” argument. You do that all the time. That’s what you did with my original reply, and it was unnecessary.

1. Who said anything about intimacy? Gay men can spend years fucking a woman. Is it unfathomable that straight men can spend years fucking men? Maybe these straight guys are deluding themselves. Maybe they’re really straight. In the end, it doesn’t really make a difference. Unless you’re sleeping with these models or you’re a part of their family, I don’t see why you’re so invested in their home life.

2. I said nothing about porn work getting discovered. I talked about demons. Gay porn models have issues just like straight porn models have issues.

For the record, this started because I made a simple comment about models coming back. You’re the one who made it into lecture on how lazy, depraved straight guys are trying to infiltrate gay porn. You’re bound and determined to vilify people based solely on their sexual identity. I don’t go around the web making comments about who is straight and who isn’t. I don’t follow articles on straight guys so I can put them on blast. I don’t do those things for straight/gay/bi guys because I don’t care. I’m not obsessed. You clearly are. Good luck with that.

Hahahaha!!!! Who’s condemning them?! All I’m saying is, to gay porn studios out there and just generally, I don’t care for these people, for whatever reason, and if you want my custom you will not hire these people. And I encourage all others who feel similarly to let their opinion be known as well. Surely, we’re allowed to express our opinion, right?

Some people would say being gay is a subversion of our natural orientation. These guys apparently have no issue with gay people, and they have no issue working in a gay industry. You’re condemning people for the simple fact of their sexuality. Do you not see the hypocrisy in that?
The fact of the matter is, there have always been guys who identify as straight in gay porn. Always. The term “straight trade” was created for a reason. Go through Falcon’s catalogue and you’ll plenty of straight guys who became huge stars. That’s true of many of the big name studios. Who someone sleeps with on their own time has nothing to do with whether or not they should be permitted to work in this industry. Being a douchebag isn’t limited a specific size, ethnicity or sexuality. Life is too short to spend time doing social media background checks on porn models, and seeing who is straight and who isn’t. Why obsess over something that obviously bothers you? Why devote so much time on people who anger you? I don’t have a desire to live that way.

Ugh. Those people didn’t kill themselves because their porn work was discovered…

ETA: You’re bound and determined to defend these gay-for-pay guys so there’s no point in continuing this.

I don’t know about lazier, but they’ve got to a be little (more) depraved – a little wanting mentally – in order to subvert their natural orientation.

1. Not every straight guy who does gay porn has an opposition to homosexuality. Yes, a person’s dietary choice is the same as the expression of a person’s sexuality. You can choose to eat meat, or not. A “straight” guy can choose to have sex with a man, or not. A gay guy can choose to have sex with a woman, or not. Gay, Straight and Bi people can choose to have sex with nobody. They’re all choices. Who you desire sexually isn’t a choice. Who you become intimate with is.

2. Arpad Miklos. Wilfried Knight. Roman Ragazzi. Damon Audigier. That new porn model from a few weeks ago. That’s just off the top of my head. Everyone has demons. That has nothing to do with sexuality. Absolutely nothing.