Some serious evasions and contradictions in your post. Not my business to dissect all that. A final word: If you don’t like knowing someone’s status, don’t research it (that you know the status of these men means you have put in some time/interest. I browse porn regularly and have no idea about their status, because porn to me is a way of unwinding, nothing more ).

You’re lying. Your initial comment was purposely vague & snarky in order to bait someone into responding before you replied with your monologue about sexual health.

By going this route you’d look less like a condescending jerk because now you’re just ‘explaining yourself’ instead of imposing your beliefs and passing judgement on others. It doesn’t even make sense why you’re even commenting if you’re not at all interested in bareback scenes- so we see what you’re really doing here.

That last response was far too long and involved not to be something you weren’t harboring for a while.

Get some real-life friends to spout that venom to or backbone to be the asshole you truly are next time.

Those that trivialize the issue by downplaying it’s severity by replying “chill” or “lighten up” need to realize that there’s plenty of opportunities in life to chill, but this is not one of them.

Being apathetic, flippant or dismissive about an issue like this is reprehensible.

Many people misinterpret the belief, “Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.” to include that your opinion can’t be wrong or flawed because it’s yours. “Cats are assholes” is an opinion but it is in no way ‘true,’ it’s merely a statement which susceptible to critique when declared publicly.

It’s also self-absorbed to believe we’re incapable of having bad, inappropriate or hostile opinions, motivations or desires. Your opinion isn’t proof or protection, it’s a statement of personal preference, nothing more.

Therefore the defense, “If you don’t like it, don’t look.” is lazy, irresponsible and dangerous here because we’re equating sexual violence towards underaged youth as disposable entertainment.

Why does one need an airbrushed reenactment of underaged rape for sexual entertainment? Are you a pedophile, indulging/dealing with your own experience/issues or devoid of empathy? I ask because pedophilia is an actual problem, not fodder for masturbation.

Lastly, I’m aware that while some have had consensual, romantic and/or sexual relationships with much older people while underaged, you must be very mindful and delicate when addressing it because these interactions can more often be traumatizing, violent, and/or in some cases, deadly.

I said I DON’T like knowing their status. Reread the post. Porn is a fantasy for me and sorry, I don’t fantasize about STD’s, hence knowing a pornstar has one takes me out of the scene because of the reality of STD’s STI’s becomes part of the performance. This is just me as a viewer telling other viewers on a porn blog one of my many likes/dislikes when it come to selecting a scene to watch. I don’t watch t-girl scenes but I don’t mistreat them as people so don’t take that statement as an indicator of how I treat the poz men in my life. My point was if they didn’t discuss it all, it wouldn’t make their scenes unwatchable for some viewers. As for undetectable, the medical advancements being made are great and I’m happy HIV+ men and women are living healthier, longer lives but I’m stlll not incurring any risk, no matter how minimal with HIV. I’m on Prep and use condoms with any non regular partner who’s status I’m not aware of. I can’t for the life of me understand why anyone neg would let a poz guy fuck them raw, but I’m not a sex worked or a bottom so it’s beyond my spectrum of understanding anyways. We can all receive the same info and interpret it differently. Undectable isn’t “negative lite” to me. A person with an undetectable viral load is still poz so I’m going to use condoms with them. What others do is up to them but putting on video for the world to see is inviting questions about their sexual health. Sorry if you see things differently. But none of my post were meant to show any personal animus to those living with HIV.

I like the other top. The bottoms are a tad too young looking. Like Helix young.

How did you get through the overlay pix without going blind? It look like ML hired Lisa Frank to do the photoshop. Can you IMAGINE???

We’re on a gay porn blog discussing a ML bug chaser scene, I think my comment was restrained considering… When it comes to Duckface, I say the cuntier – the better. I personally don’t like knowing performers status’ for this very reason. Instead of focusing on how hot the guys or the sex in the scene is, for me at least, it becomes about who has what and what risk factors are involved. It totally takes me out of the scene and I tend to avoid poz performers scenes for this reason.

James Castle.

Wait, Lucas is producing bug chaser porn and I’m the wrong one? Love your comment anyways.

Who is poz? Or was it a question in general?

That’s how I felt. Was I looking at WB or Seventeen Magazine with that ridiculous editorial spread?

Obviously some people don’t have to try. Not being cunty btw.
PS: If you’re serious, passing on HIV while being undetectable is very very low, with Prep or without.

I thought it was an interesting pairing.

You wrong.

Expect it in 2019.

Listen up, HENNY! School was still in session so they had an excuse. I don’t see you posting about porn when you got SHIT TA DEW.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1d55f51952cd7cceed678586f4cacfb31e1e17a2f31682a4d9c48f463f3d4767.gif