Yeah, cum from fucking doesn’t always happen even for cum machine Jess. But yes, he managed to do it this time. It was an awesome scene and the positions were really hot. Call me basic but I love a good missionary and Jess/Deacon did that. I just wish Jess came after Deacon did during the first part. Apart from that, I loved everything. Even the camera work is good. Definitely a solid week for SC. I think it’s been quite a while since they gave us two consecutive amazing scenes.

Will try to check the Calvin/Devin though I can’t promise I’ll be able to watch it in its entirety.

I’ll let you tell me after you watch it. I’ll just say that it meets my “cum from fucking” rule, which I adhere to pretty closely even though it causes me to delete scenes that I would otherwise desperately want to keep. Chandler’s cumshots were works of art, but he only came from fucking once or twice in all those scenes, including one internal that was a no-doubter even though he mistakenly shot too far inside for the bottom to push it back out (which is why Corbin Fisher is so afraid to end a scene that way even though it’s so … much … hotter …)..

If you go through Jess’s old scenes, you won’t find a lot of cumshots without edits, so this was a treat. But Calvin Banks fucking Devin Franco was “that good” for sure. I wish I could have you over for a screening party.

Thank you for the prompt response👌 i second that,..” they should’ve looped it” especially the pre-cum moment, It should’ve been on the timeline..they did the repeat-play already but they cut to another frame too soon and I think each frame should’ve been longer even after one’s cummed like scene Graham & Ollie or some classic Sc’ scenes in 2009. Dominicford also did slow motion with one repeated play for cumshot ( you have to watch scene “Kurt Von Ryder & Duncan black “ it was amazing 😉)
Do you think we should send a feedback about this issue to SC?

The easiest way to paraphrase it would be to call it an instant replay. Show the entire moment uninterrupted in the long shot, then cut to the closeup and show the same moment again.

I have been taking a tour down memory lane recently, due to the fact that I fixed a compatibility problem between my external hard drive and my very old blu ray player; and as a result, I’ve been perusing a few older CM scenes. (God, I miss you, Isaiah. And those big hard nips of yours!) Bryan used that technique in a scene I watched recently from eight or so years ago. Instead of choosing one angle from among two or three existing choices, show them all in succession. William Higgins’s old films from the 80s did that quite a bit, with one shot usually being run in slow motion. (Admittedly, no one uses slo-mo anymore, but that’s mainly because no one is in love with their mediocre cinematography.)

Gay directors who didn’t trust the natural hotness of their own scenes would sometimes use looping to make a cumshot look bigger than it really was. Shoot a five-spurt orgasm from both a high and low angle, and you can do a 3-cut-2-cut-3 sequence and suddenly it’s seven spurts. I certainly don’t advocate that. There’s a trust-but-verify element involved in porn — we look at a picture and trust that the endowment is accurate. We look at cum and trust that it’s coming from a cock and not a hidden tube. Sean Cody has been pretty trustworthy even after the change in ownership, so I don’t want to blow this out of proportion. But when directors cut a scene at the most vital moment, I start asking questions.

Have only skimmed through it. I’ll watch Elian/Beau/Dane first. LOL! Was it that good?

Sorry!! I’m a bit vague about “ they should have looped it”.. what you meant: they have one original shot ( main view) and one closeup- therefore these frames should have been mixed on the timeline Or have to have good enough length in frame ( original shot) to avoid interrupting feeling?

Wow, okay — Jess’s first cumshot with Deacon wasn’t an internal either, but have you seen it???

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ccefa63aca4359ee4ec6d205ad21bce2fa6020ebd540a7d0d847ba2d7114671d.gif

Given Sean’s position, it wouldn’t have oozed out of his ass. If he was on top of Jax like those gifs, it would’ve come out of his ass.You can see around the 24:44 mark that Sean’s ass was full of cum. I feel like Jax pulled out at the last minute that why we still saw the last spurt come out of his dick. But the initial spurt definitely came out inside Sean’s ass. It didn’t seem like an edit to me. Just the usual fuck-ups of SC’s film crew. I think they really wanted to emphasize the internal that’s why they focused on it. But that’s just me. And I still loved it. LOL!

LOL! Cocky Boys has always been great with their camera work. That’s something Sean Cody really needs to work on. And of course. they have two very different directing style. I personally prefer SC, but I can’t deny CB is good at what they do. The only thing that prevents me from being a fan is their roster.

I would add that Jax looks amazing, so I’m rooting for them to give me a scene that is free of my misgivings.

If you get a chance, watch Calvin Banks fuck Devin Franco. Flawlessly lit, flawlessly performed, lensed, and above all, flawlessly edited. No “here’s what I think happened.”

yeah no, Deacon and Asher need to be retired from SC

The eye doctor has me on a strict NO LANE SEEING DIET !!!

I get what you’re saying. These guys should be left alone. But these guys being “exposed” is a phenomenon as old as entertainment itself. People have always wanted to know the true lives and characters of entertainers, whether it be music, acting, porn, whatever. It’s just now easier than ever. But since the days of Rock Hudson being “exposed”, James Dean (or they tried), the days of painters and playwrights being exposed, to today with porn stars and music celebs. People always want to know. Nothing has changed except the ease of access.

I think Jax is equally blessed & capable of handling both assignment !

Are we talking about the orgasm at the 24:30 mark? I’m with @Targett:disqus

After examining it a couple of times, I’m willing to buy it as a cum-from-fucking because Sean’s cock appears to be at the same hardness and his hand in the same position before and after the edit, but they really compromised the hotness (and the credibility) by editing the shot at all. (I hate to be such a doubting Thomas, but watch enough SketchySex fraud orgasms and you leave feeling suspicious all the time. Or look at enough Sean Cody scenes from 2012-13 and you leave feeling bewildered that they can’t get right once what they got right every other week back then.)

Jax’s cock and Sean’s ass were already well in frame, so there was no need to cut to a closeup, or if they felt compelled to do so, they should have looped it so that you see the cum in the original shot AND in the closeup.

Regardless, I’m not able to call that an internal. With an internal, the cum, if it’s visible at all, oozes from the hole not from the dick. From what I see, Jax pulled out and started shooting, and that’s giving them the benefit of the doubt — what literally happened is that Jax pulled out, then there was an edit, and then he started shooting.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/57ee936ca5d14d72908d9d6f4edab39fd863149fe8c7ef4984de8f3f78adf00d.gif

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e521e49aabffae4ede941d858a0b4d7ebd37e9002aff8ae09438ba48dda1a4c5.gif