Active Duty isn’t as bad. It’s the same as it has always been. Hot guys from time to time, with some okay sex scenes. The final side by side jack off race is a bit dull.

Now that you say that, you are right. I think adding Active Duty to the list too. What a damn shame what happened to that site.

They’ve both gone to shit and have trouble getting fresh (quality) talent. ..at least Corbin Fisher isn’t so paint by numbers- both guys kiss and do oral (that isn’t rushed,) unlike SC which is- they follow the same formula, bottom gives a (painful) rushed BJ in part 1 and top gives a rimjob in part 2.

GH.
Stop That!

Now that that’s out of the way, the model in question has a terrific body for a 20 year old, is a height that personally excites me, and sounds like he is definitely down to film guy-guy content, having some prior experience with other guys. So –

Score!

I see a lot of complaints about SC, but I think the site that has completely destroyed itself if Corbin Fisher. Wow has that site completely gone down hill. All about Dane and Dane only. The production is down. The guys are terrible. Just a mess in my opinion. I can’t believe there has not been any backlash to be honest. The old Corbin Fisher was brilliant.

I responded to you, they didn’t post it, so i’ll let it go. I’m not distressed. I’m sure we’ll comment on each others posts again. See ya.

Thanks.

i don’t know why they would think it works, the scenes are being posted on other sites you don’t have to look hard to see these guys. Are they that naive to think their identities will remain hidden. If it’s marketing– it is simply a fail.

But so true, those disclaimers are necessary. Oh, and the latest “secret” scene is better than most of their scenes. Another strange way to run a site, don’t tell anyone anything about the best scenes. That is the fourth of these scenes that is good. I don’t get it.

Why, you don’t care?

I’m not distressed, I just see it as a rip off, same as Corbin Fisher advertising 7 updates a week here, still!, and new guys every week, when they’ve had 12-13 in the past 6 months. Ripping off consumers is not exclusive to SC.

FYI, IMO, this solo guy is better than anything at SC in 2019, despite the stupid covered face on the blogs mean to promote it. Don’t worry though, my SC is up soon (actually 2-3 months).

But… I still will have GH to complain about for a while longer than that.
Big difference is that GH was never good,never mind great, just has the hottest guys, and SC was the best in the business for a decade, and has been totally ruined. I guess it’s a question of expectations.

Why don’t you just block my comments then you won’t have to see them, same as I do with the laughable SC sycophant on this blog.
I actually do like reading your comments though.

Only question I really have is why do you remember what I say? You’re not wrong, I just find it strange, or you just have a really good memory. Maybe it’s your priorities that need to be self-examined.

The whole point of blocking their faces is to try to recruit more solo-only (openly) homophobic models that don’t want their friends and family to think they’re “f@gs” because they did a solo for a gay site.
SC is having shit luck getting new models because of how easily people are getting “exposed.”

I don’t really care about the straight scenes, as the sites aren’t linked, so you have to look for them, unlike CorbinFisher, where you can’t avoid them. And I know there is a solo and a sex scene per week at GH, and you clearly see whether you are subscribing to streaming only or downloads, no surprise there, that’s what I expect. Unlike Corbin Fisher which wont even keep a consistent update schedule other than every other day.

But I just joined GH recently, only due to 2 guys, well aware of how awful the production and attitude on the site is.

But changes to schedules for sites you are paying for– less product for the same money is not fair trade. Or “full access” when you subscribe, yet then you find that downloads are charged additionally on a per video basis. Where is that notification? SC does that, but not for legacy subscribers– only new subscribers. Fair, I don’t think so, even though it doesnt apply to me.
Of course I’ve only wanted to keep 6 downloads in the past 15 months anyway.
I guess I’m expecting too much of porn sites to be honest and above board.
I’m done, too much rambling on my part, sorry.

You rarely liked the solos. You rarely like anything SC puts out. And you’ve repeatedly said you can’t wait until your subscription runs out. But you want people to complain about a site you feel has been garbage for years? For what, so you can chime in about how much extra garbage it is because they got rid of half their solos? If porn is causing you this much distress, perhaps you need to rethink your priorities.

😄

I think this was the alternate opening to Milton’s Paradise Lost.

It’s to get new (solo-only) models and not subs.

Lol. So many disclaimers.