I don’t think they even watch their own shit tbh, too much effort. I’m sure even they are bored to tears with some names showing up.

They probably just saw the names and thought “Well, they’ve been bred six ways from Sunday everywhere else. This has the be BB, right?”

They lost the magnifying glass? -OR- More likely nobody was interested enough to actually LOOK at the scene (more likely).

Definitely looks like an error on MEN’s part.based on the lead photo.

I’ve always thought that MEN writers compete for the stupidest premise that makes it to a released video. It seems that they also compete for the dumbest sentence that makes it to a released video description. And we have a winner.

That’s interesting. This is definitely not the first time this mistake has happened — in fact, I could swear it happened in the last month. Someone wrote “this isn’t bareback,” someone else wrote “so what?” or something to that effect. And I chimed in and pointed out that it was mislabeled.

The mistake in this instance seems to be on MEN’s part as they advertise this scene as bareback on their site and probably sent promotional materials doing the same. Why they would do that is beyond me though?

Fixed.

But I’ll give credit where due, these two have been in gay porn for many years now and they still look good.

It’s my impression that this site is more mistake prone than in years past, and less concerned with corrections when raised in comments. It’s free content so it’s hard to be pissed, but personally I like for things to be right.