Oh I didn’t mean for you, sorry if that was ambiguous, I meant that I imagine the same people who have a problem with the sister website would look at twinktop and say yeah not buying it, this is meat to make the sister websites look better.

He’s legal. 42 years old. Some folks have good genes.

You lost me with the follow-up comment. I thought your point was that if he is a legal adult and wants to do porn, he doesn’t need justifying? I wasn’t attempting to deflect anything — his scenes never offended me.

once you put the smaller guy in the top role

I can see that looking like a justification of sorts, for the other videos in which the little guy gets fucked, to deflect accusations of making surrogate kiddie porn. For me who’s top and who’s bottom has no bearing on the issue, what’s important is they checked his id and he’s legal.

It’s obvious what he means

It actually wasn’t obvious to me for several reasons. One is what you said, although I think Austin Young was pretty convincing in those scenes with Jacob Armstrong. It’s hilarious to look back at those early Family Dick scenes and be reminded that they changed his name to suit the scene. He was Austin Armstrong, Austin Lock, etc. I think that was a disservice to the models, but they seemed to survive without a consistent name. (I always bemoaned the fact that Max Orloff/Jan Dvorak/Pavel Novotny’s career was splintered across all those names.) But anyway, that was years ago, and I think he looks a lot more substantial now. He still qualifies as a twink, but that’s the other thing — once you put the smaller guy in the top role and pair him with a much older man, I don’t know about you but for me the “innocence stolen” illusion isn’t there anymore if it was ever there to begin with.

You’re making an additional argument that there’s a bit of discrimination involved in the effort to condemn the model for conforming to a certain body type that reads as illicit, and I think that’s a really interesting point. You just helped me remember that part of what I find appealing in these scenes is that historically, gay porn is so regressively policed by the West Hollywood studios (and eventually the European ones), and this studio is saying, “Fuck that. Older men can be beautiful, and young men can not only choose them but feel lucky to be chosen by them.” With Falcon and Catalina in charge, Dallas and Austin would both be on the outside looking in, prohibited from being the object of desire.

Where you the “twink top” the first time you had sex? I was, might have something to do with why we like it.

It’s obvious what he means, but teensy little Austin never looked that young to me, I can tell the difference between size and age. I don’t have any proclivity for specific types, but I certainly don’t ban a whole group of people over being small of stature.

the site owner has someone (whether it’s him or someone else) wearing the stupid orthopedic compression-like socks in the majority of scenes he churns out, as though he gets off on them (in addition to all of his other apparent fixations). guess i just don’t understand the necessity. to me it’s the equivalent of some old man wearing black socks with sandals to the beach. do you take umbrage with that?

Who does he appeal to?

I have to say I would never have created this site and never would have sought it out sight unseen, but they do some beautiful scenes. Not that the photography is ever a problem even at Brother Crush, which I think is their worst spinoff. But Twinktop … whoever manages that company just really seems to know what they’re doing. I also like Austin Young so I was curious what you meant.