I think it is a stretch to assume that because the first 2 GH bareback scenes both have Kane in them it means that will be a long-term pattern. The sense I get is that GH flies a guy out to shoot some scenes and he stays several days and performs in a few scenes and then he goes back to his home until (hopefully) a next time. Then GH is on to the next guy who has been flown out. My GUESS is that Kingsley will have also performed in at least one other bareback scene with someone else during his first stay at GH, before he departs and then (hopefully) returns. I give GH an “A” on both of their first BareBack newbies and look forward to seeing who else they will procure.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fac3dc1fae74d12a08a3b7008256da42279c2d01b6baf08a2e6928eb34de5c0c.gif

CUM IN!

Tehehehehe! Trust Issues. I don’t get the dorky and goofy “Keith Vibe” but if you do I can understand why that would be a boner-killer. No disrespect to Keith but I too don’t think of him sexually at all. Ned is another story, who Kane reminds me of. Kingsley has, to me, a more “serious” and “non-silly” vibe, which I enjoy, and a beautiful, long, thin and elegant body. Keith is so physically awkward. Kingsley is so physically graceful. I enjoy the scene with him on his back with his long foot in the pointed-toe position, à la ballet class, as he is being fucked. I understand your “thirst” for YUMMY Kane. Finding him nekkid on the bed, hooded, handcuffed and ready to be fucked is a visual treat, (albeit an unlikely storyline). It gets the juices flowing though.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4caa0c60e2e659043340d9d35b6ece85ce624b6351808368f6ce712c8de36114.gif

Maybe it’s just me but I find it hard to take Kingsley seriously ’cause he’s giving me Try Guys Keith vibes. LOL! I can’t with Kane teasing us with his hole. My thirst for Kane is real! Ugh…