Exactly the point that I just made to Quietest elsewhere. I have no memory of finding him at any of the releases of scenes that he described as being “for him” praising and celebrating those scenes, thus encouraging and supporting the making of them. He only goes to scenes that he sees as not being for him to bitch that a MINORITY of the scenes released are not for him. Meanwhile ignoring the MAJORITY of the scenes that are. According to the write-up 8 performers have been filmed in the Sweet Meat series. So that means there will definitely be more, which I’m glad for. This one looks sexy to me, and challenging toxic masculinity can only be a good thing for the possibility of personal growth. I do not see a honest and sexy portrayal of this legitimate gay fantasy and fetish as “gimmicky.” I see it as being inclusive.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/772671744cf3cc0b900c6f4e469e4cd3c8a995146db3ecbba8ed3b330c5c46f6.gif

Porn with good looking gay men enjoying sex together has little to no engagement on blogs. Makes it hard to tell if consumers want to watch what those studios are producing. Beyond the people who comment how its boring, unoriginal, over-produced, etc. Naked Sword is being experimental with men in heels, panties and aerobic outfits from the 1980s. I don’t believe the studio will continue with escalating gimmicks. The upcoming movies will have their regular strong narratives and hot butt-fucking. If they prove me wrong with that last point I’m writing a letter.

Now. What I need from you is a 750-word+ synopsis with at least two examples of scenes created from your vivid imagination. Aaaand… go!

I was particularly addressing your disingenuous “worry” about porn because some scenes are released that are “not for you”, when the MAJORITY of porn released fits your description of what is “for you”. Also, if you “respect” what someone wants then you don’t criticize what they want as being “unwanted” and gimmicky and question why they would want it because you don’t. PARTICULARLY when this scene does not look gimmicky even a little bit. It looks like a HONEST and non gimmicky portrayal of a sexy fantasy or fetish that some have. If you truly “respect” those who want this, then you WANT it for them. So, your “respect” is disingenuous as well.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/73497f984d06cd5c43bda3761582b71c970a24e6ebbf0ffa16a4342f1b1f6249.gif

And…?

There are many recipes that combine meat and sweet fruits, like chicken with oranges, pineapples or apples, and also pork with apples, etc. Originally sweetmeats were confectionaries like cookies and candies. The word “meat” comes from the Old English word, “mete” that means FOOD. Sweet Meat has become a modern term for the penis or a gay man considered to be “effeminate.” There are men who enjoy dressing seductively in clothes that women might wear, and there are those who enjoy seeing that, so YES this scene has value, especially since it is not handled campily or jokingly but HONESTLY. It also gives Gay and BI men a chance to confront themselves and know if they are toxically male. Your “worry” is disingenuous because you KNOW that most ALL Gay porn studios give to you what you want but that is not enough for the dictator in you. You need for ALL studios to give to you exactly what you want in their every scene.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69ac6c6db39284b0c4f1087934bd472f76ca0d501314530119c1ddec38a162f9.gif

Are you tut-tutting me? Tehehehehe!

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b805fd0992d8d7a17fea7d83e92e9d2354337f535cc0ab4406ca6cc856b2e5dd.gif

B is WB’s tut-tutting school marm.

There is far too much gimmickry, I agree. I think it comes (in Men’s case, at least) from porn being made by people who don’t consume it. Straight women, for instance. This surprising coming from NS, they’re usually much better than this. I mean if Beaux wants to out on women’s clothes, more power to him. If Reign likes him that way, more power to him also. But no one wants to see Reign in silly one pieces or tights.

Just do what everyone else does and block it. You’ll be glad you did.

… for the dictator in you.

Watch it Mr.!! You are passing a border here.
I specifically stated that I respect everybody who likes this kind of porn.
And I further specified it’s not for me.

Oh yeah, and please keep the encyclopedic wisdom to yourself. Don’t try to feed it to me.
Why don’t you go away altogether? I’m sure you are annoying many here.

I’m always here for direct attacks against TOXIC MASCULINITY, especially since it often seems
that way too many posters here are toxically male. This scene could help some of those to more
clearly notice if they are but have never before thought of themselves as being that. The
director seems to have filmed this scene in a serious manner and not in any way as a joke.
He seems to have made it as an opportunity for Gay and Bi men to confront themselves. Beaux
and Reign are wearing clothes and how one automatically reacts to those clothes will reveal to
the viewer how toxically male he is. You passed the test.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2f737793ae8a477bc939237e92f5cce5a7fbd0a6f072247aedadb4e9bb05fa34.gif

Is there a big audience for this kind of gay porn? On this point my imagination lets me down.

Sweet meat? Meet isn’t sweet and shouldn’t be sweetened. Very bad for good taste development.