I have NEVER written that a scene is good or great or anything, unless I truly have seen it. Other people look at the trailers and write that the scene is bad or boring or stupid or unwanted, etc. And people like you then think those negative comments are from those who saw the scene. I estimate that at least 90% are not. I have fun making gifs of the sexy performers and commenting on the storylines, if the scene has one, and I comment on how a particular performer looks to me. It seems you think their way is valid and my way is not. Posting comments after only seeing the trailer is okay as long as the comments are negative. Okay… Noted.

Bayer won’t understand your point and will respond in a dunderheaded fashion in 3, 2, 1….

We have climate deniers and we have this person whose superpower is Racism Deflection when he likes the white person or company involved.

Massa B: The fact that the pun on mulatto “NEVER occurred to [you]” is of no consequence. Other people don’t exist in your head (merciful gay Jesus)! And you haven’t ruled out a play on words at all with your attempt at demonstrating Hooked on Phonics for us. The two spellings can be pronounced the same way.

You are not the arbiter of what’s racist–pure and simple. And you are so busy defending white people whom you like from charges of racism that you don’t pause to consider that you lack both objectivity and even basic knowledge on the topic, as you’ve demonstrated time and again. You have a bunch of speculations and guesses that you arrange into “the truth” that you want to see. Unless it’s a white person whom you already dislike, you see no racism. Of course, you are happy to sniff out racism in a person of color who detects racism when you don’t.

The question you should ask yourself is why it gets you soooo bothered. Why you can’t say: maybe sometimes other people have a point that I should listen to?

It’s ok that you won’t. Sad, but ok.

So, you think the other posters here somehow see the scenes a day or three BEFORE they are even released? So, you think the same names that you see at the different studios all are subscribers to all those studios? Thank you for reminding me of why I do what I do. I don’t review a scene as others do, who look at a trailer and review the scene as boring, or stupid, or unwanted, etc. I have fun making gifs CELEBRATING the performers and the possibilities of the scene based on the trailer. So, looking at a trailer and reviewing the scene negatively is okay for you, but looking at the trailer and celebrating the possibilities of the scene is not? REALLY? Interesting.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/05e6c275f50dea98a27c2be8a7a3952eafd7ff5ff3b7852cecf47cc2f8c8ddcd.gif

He said, CONDESCENDINGLY. Tehehehehe! Remember I did not reply to your post. I have not even read your post. It is WAY too long and I had (and still have) no interest. I realized early on that we are not of like mind. YOU replied to me because you seemingly decided I’m supposed to see Kane as you do. I don’t think you should see him as I do. Contemplate that difference. What you see as “extra” about him could be exactly what excites me about him because the appreciation of a porn scene and performer is WHAT? It’s SUBJECTIVE. Also, as in real life, some people may like certain things about you and others might dislike those exact things.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3441eb823a6194ef5d31e1ef7585a74cbc9205c302cdf0725101b3a4f1a591f9.gif

I don’t understand what I’m saying = CONDESCENDING.

I don’t know how to review a scene = CONDESCENDING.

I NEVER wrote you were wrong. I wrote that our reaction to porn is SUBJECTIVE. It’s not checking the accuracy of a mathematical equation. It’s about what we each, INDIVIDUALLY, feel sexually aroused by. So, you invented something I did NOT write and then informed me I was not “allowed” to write what I did not write. If I had I’m certainly ALLOWED to. Your attitude that I am not = CONDESCENDING. You are right for YOU, and I’m right for ME.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fa9788e3a29e2d9b6f2bc659ff2eff12d16929e4912a7b2cb602ca4f898b259e.gif

La La is good for mentioning people’s ethnicities on the regular. This is on Brand for them.

so as long as the scenes gives you good gifs; its a good scene in your eyes.okay noted. lmao.

thank you! its dumb.

go away.

I don’t understand what I’m saying = CONDESCENDING.

I don’t know how to review a scene = CONDESCENDING.

I NEVER wrote you were wrong. I wrote that our reaction to porn is SUBJECTIVE. It’s not checking the accuracy of a mathematical equation. It’s about what we each, INDIVIDUALLY, feel sexually aroused by. So, you invented something I did NOT write and then informed me I was not “allowed” to write what I did not write. If I had I’m certainly ALLOWED to. Your attitude that I am not = CONDESCENDING. You are right for YOU, and I’m right for ME.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fa9788e3a29e2d9b6f2bc659ff2eff12d16929e4912a7b2cb602ca4f898b259e.gif

this my last time commenting on this bc clearly you don’t understand what you’re even saying.

if i’m a director and hire two ppl to play a role; the job of the actors are to make it believable. in this case; in this performance; he wasn’t believable throughout. i know this bc i’ve seen how Kane perform and engage on his Onlyfans. i am not obsessed with needing to be there with him and head over hills for him that i can’t make a fair assessment of the scene.

you say porn is fantasy which is more so “acting” but complaining to me that he is not really acting here bc i said he was. porn doesn’t have to be a docu but great porn scenes are believable. i’m sick of yall that only follow a person here on there on GH always having the most to say.

you said condescending at the time of which i made my reply. what you did after that makes no difference. lol. you clearly don’t know how to review a scene or at least isn’t very good at it. lol. so yeah, like what and who you like, but if you want a review discussion; be able to present evidence to support your point.

for example; Micky had issues staying erect, he was barely fucking him in most of the scene bc he went soft. it was cut again at the end so Kane could nut. and cut again so could get hard and nut. yes, it had playful moments and Mickey did pretty could at foreplay. it highlighted parts of the video that turned you on which is fine. and the very presence of Kane apparently turns you on as well which mean you’re already going to be bias in your review. i have seen better scenes and better directing from this studio so i know a trash scene when i see it, but it doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to like it.

you are just not allowed to tell me i’m wrong for making a directing observations. just say you don’t agree and move on.

LOL – “you said it wasn’t extra, and we KNOW otherwise” –

Look up the word condescending, which I had removed from my post almost as soon as I posted it. You don’t KNOW otherwise. You PERCEIVE otherwise. I’m happy when I see Kane. That is MY reality. And you are basically telling me why I shouldn’t have my reality. Porn is FANTASY and it is SUBJECTIVE. It’s not mathematical, just as art isn’t. If it is ALL an act (like in a Hollywood movie) then there are those who will enjoy the act and there are those who won’t. I enjoy Kane’s “act” if it is all one. I want to be the one there, with him, so for me he’s successfully presenting himself in the Fantasy. I want to be Micky and whoever else he is paired with. I don’t look for porn to be a documentary, and If he’s feeling his oats now, then GOOD for him. To me, he should and he might need that. I don’t know how his life has been.

For someone who mainly watches porn trailers you certainly have a lot to say lmfao🤣

it’s not condescending. lol. you said it wasn’t extra. and we know otherwise. and i’m not saying just at that part of all of it was extra just that it was noticeable how the vibe of the video changed. tracking down scenes. lol. oh please, i just happen to see them when they come out. and being that i have seen more of his material than you; i have more experience to speak on his performance overall from my perspective.

Kane is a definition of a guy that allowed being known get to his head and you can from his latest scenes which wasn’t so much the case in the beginning. know he seems more concerned about the camera and how he will look. if you only see Kane in trailers than maybe you shouldn’t be so bold about your take about him. you can like with you like and thats fine but i a tell you; there was alot of acting in this scene. just say you still enjoyed it regardless and thats completely fine. i watch more amateur porn bc of the less acting nature they have so i know acting when i see it. lol.

What is “extra” for some is not “extra” for all. You and david david may have thought the unexpected sounds Kane made when Micky was rimming him intensely, for example, was “extra”. But I was laughing joyfully at the authenticness and in-the-momentness of it all. It was a high pitched reaction I’d NEVER heard before and sounded PRIMAL to me. What you look for in porn is apparently not what I look for in porn, nor need it be. I ONLY see Kane in the trailers here at GH, and I doubt I’m the only one. I’ve not made a study of Kane tracking down the scenes he’s been in elsewhere. Here, I enjoy him immensely, not only physically but his personality as well, and his performances. I’ve also enjoy his progression. He’s among my favorites and has not worn out his welcum. His bootay, in particular, is everything.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13f6f349c44a76a1a1ec7754ad866d923c60b7897d811c8abec863e5a36c11a6.gif

It NEVER occurred to me that it might be a variant of m-U-latto. Not only because of the A instead of the U, but also because of the double Ls instead of the double Ts. which causes for the pronunciation to be MALL, like where one goes to shop, which is really far away from the sound MUH. But I get that the RacistHunters here are always on the hunt for what it is they hunt for. I googled Mallato and it is a legitimate last name that can be found on census records and passenger lists and draft cards. It has been so long since I’ve heard the word used I had forgotten about it. It is definitely a word from the distant PAST. I’m not sure that many young people even know what it means. But if you feel you are having a “gotcha” moment, and that is important to you, then congratulations. I will also add that I don’t believe for one second that new performers don’t have a say in the porn name they use. Micky may have chosen it without any help from GH.

There are a few others who I think are particularly exciting, including Leon, BUT Micky is definitely competing for the top spot. Especially the top spot for someone just out of the gate. Some things about him definitely got my attention. including how engaged he stayed with Kane, the person, and not just with Kane, the fuckee. And I enjoyed how he varies the tempo. I dislike it when a guy has sex at one speed……FAST. Beautiful body and really cute face as well. p.s. I really like Kane too, visually, and as a performer, BUT when he was new and just out of the gate, Micky beats him hands down.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e6a59a2757d48e347a54558d4843aa6e3789c0b1197bcd6e662332931cd53a65.gif