I was very resistant to them when they came out. I thought that it was just a way to make studio porn look more like xtube or OF porn, which for me was defeating the purpose and regressing to the mean. In my defense, I think maybe I was right about their motives, and I also think that screenshots are not the best way to experience those scenes. That’s a long prelude to admitting I was soooo wrong to be so resistant to that series. Whatever their strategy was, they combined the “edgy” lighting with greater sexual intensity. It didn’t just change the mood visually, it changed how the performers engaged with each other for whatever reason. And though dim lighting does not make a good scene, they didn’t merely turn the lights down. It was more artistic than that, as I think the pic below somewhat captures.

As for Rocky and Barron, they both came in close proximity with no edit after Barron pulled out. Of course that’s the foremost way to get my attention! I’m not sure when I’ve seen Barron do that, but I admit I never clicked with him the way other people did and may not remember his scenes accurately.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1a6f7b7103edcb724dd8544a2ac6b4fd4e0529b9c2f6faacbcc1f7158b8ead2f.png

The differences in Barron’s face are OBVIOUS. Are you able to look at Barbra Streisand and notice she has a large nose? So often a female celebrity will talk about wanting to be filmed and photographed on their “good side” (i.e. Mariah Carey). It is RARE that someone has no differences between the two sides of their face. R A R E! But In spite of Barron’s OBVIOUS differences, your position has become that he is a RARITY and has NO differences. Tehehehehe! That would be funny if it were not SOOOOO funny. The highlight in the center of his nose reveals the OBVIOUS slant and then CURVE back at the tip. Hold a small square sheet of paper against the center line in my diagram and you will see the perpendicular line is near perfect. If it were a trick it would have to be slanting OBVIOUSLY DOWNWARD for the eye to the right to be on top if it. It is actually slanting VERY SLIGHTLY upward. The line to the left is OBVIOUSLY closer to the center line than the line to the right. The lines at both eyes start at their inner corners. The diagram just shows what is OBVIOUS.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/003ae0a74cc2ea293d899d0003c53941aa554a6ab0e2bf39116b809a832672a9.gif

In your first message with the facial analysis you said.

His hooked, Roman nose slants off to one side of his face.

In your new picture your middle vertical (THIN 😏) line, proves you were wrong.
Just like the not so thin vertical line in my picture did.

You also stated:

One eye and brow is lower than the other

You chose not to draw a line along the eyebrows in your new picture, but if you would have done so, you again would have proven your own wrong. Just like I did. Just consider the lower edge of my ‘horizontal’ yellow line as if it were a THIN line.

Now you said:

A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line.

This so called ‘perpendicular line’ is not tilted in the same degrees as the face is tilted in the picture, so you are cheating!

Your new vertical lines through the corners of the eyes are dubiously placed.
But I’m done with you seeing ghosts, bye, have a nice day.

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a chunk of nostril outside the line showing its slant. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is much closer to the nose. A perpendicular line THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than the eye to the left. I had seen it the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the nose on the left must have thrown me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a lot of nostril outside the line. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is closer to the nose. A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than eye to the left. I had thought it was the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the left to the nose was throwing me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a lot of nostril outside the line. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is closer to the nose. A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than eye to the left. I had thought it was the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the left to the nose was throwing me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Of corse not, with the THICK lines you used. In a picture that small the lines MUST be thin, like the ones I used. We are talking MILLIMETERS. Millimeters HIDDEN beneath your THICK lines. Even with your THICK lines you can see the nose slants to the left of the page. Measure from the edge of the nose at the nostrils on each side to the center line and you will see there is MORE nose to the left of the line than the right. AND you can easily see (with your eyes) that the eye to the left is CLOSER to the center line than the eye to the right. AND even with the THICK line you can see the eye to the left is higher than the eye to the right. You can see more exposed eye area above the THICK line than with the eye to the right. MILLIMETERS in a photo that small could equate to an inch or more on the actual person. And what is it with all the insults? Did you have a BAD day? Do you feel better now? I’m glad I could be of help. Is it upsetting to you that I’m PRAISING how uniquely and interestingly handsome someone is? Too much positivity for you?

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/974722052a8a155ef2258b3665eb0953c334825be7bf45c79d5e4156705b5c18.gif

Don’t know why I’m doing this, but here it goes.
To do a facial analysis like you tried to do, it’s absolutely necessary to use a photo that shows the face perfectly full frontal, looking perfectly straight into the camera. Like the one of the girl in the magazine, that you used trying to make your point.
It wasn’t easy to find a suitable picture of Barrons face, but I think this one comes close to what is needed.

And see: there is very little out of balance in his face. It’s very symmetrical, which is a feature that is supposed to – at least partially – define beauty.

And now … back in your cage.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bb1df63a4428cc4f6f98792d55ed114caac011fc2bfc2628e8a456dd298c5c66.jpg

And when Rocky wants cum he doesn’t waste it, he is soooooo good. Wouldn’t be shocked if these two were buds off camera.

It is a perfect photo for the SIMPLE analysis that I made. Take a sheet of paper and cover one side of his face at the center line and look at him. Then cover the other side of his face at the center line and look at him. The rather extreme nose slant and the dissimilarities in the positioning of the eyes creates two very different faces. Both Nice. When visually joined into one the two differing faces create a very intriguingly handsome man, to me. If you need to make something simple, complex, then do so. Remember that INSULTS are cheap. Anyone can throw them out and PRETEND that they know what they do not. Instead, just……..SHOW ME!

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/15e6caf12ca927a02add425c2cf098ea416df9dc9a8b8401975e6deceaaa93a8.gif

I’m intrigued by Barron’s face. He reminded me of Lauren Hutton, a very famous model from a long time ago. My art teacher was intrigued by Lauren’s face and brought pictures of her to class to point out facial dissimilarities to look for when doing a portrait, along with photos of more recent celebrities, including Channing Tatum. The slant of Barron’s nose is more dramatic, but Lauren’s nose was wider and fuller on one side, and more bulbous. Creating a slant in that way. On the fuller side of her nose her eye sat lower than the other, and closer to the nose bridge. The higher eye also had a more dramatic, uplifting brow arch. One side of her face has a sweeter, softer and more subdued look. The other side a brighter, more glamorous and intense look. It’s just an interesting similarity (to me) between handsome Barron and beautiful Lauren.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/924135a91fee80b536e133d0be7a50602846e3182f6e575097af430f6366da66.gif

You should have paid more attention to your art teacher.
The photo of Barron you used is not suited for this kind of analysis.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/06a1bb338a3e00b3b99f16c47d10a22733b760ec5e4fe47647c1292bdb817b04.gif

I understand. I feel like I’m fumbling around in the dark to watch them. OUCH! I just stubbed my toe on that damn side table and the lamp crashed onto the floor. My Bad! Tehehehehe! BUT, two beautiful guys they are. Rocky’s body just keeps getting more and more supreme looking, it seems, and Barron is the embodiment of the Handsome FairyTale Prince.

“Someday my Barron will cum……and away to his castle we’ll go. To be happy forever I know.”

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/432bccbf69a22125018994f424195963eaa4f3e8f483e449439e446b173477df.gif