Exactly. His booty is amazing and should always be pounded. I was confused as well😂😂😂

No, I don’t mean financially cheap. I mean creatively cheap. Latex masks, special effects, paying people who are essentially extras in the scene. That stuff adds up. They’re spending way more money than they would by just putting two men in a room and telling them to fuck.

Wouldn’t you think that it’s because they have little to no money that the gimmicks are indeed very cheap and just bland? Doing porn is no longer the final stage, it’s more used as an extra tool for sites such as OnlyFans and Cam4, even the escort business has more success than pornography.

With Falcon filming its first bb movie in years I’m kinda worried about the future but then again, these companies don’t care anymore so w/e

This might be something if you meant anything, but you do not.

I don’t think the piracy issue is connected to the fuckery. Because the gimmicks they’re implementing are cheap and uninspired. If they were really trying to combat the blood loss, they’d put some effort into what they’re creating. Or at the very least, make proactive efforts to prevent the piracy in the first place. Which they’re more than capable of doing, with varying degrees of success. But that’s not really a priority since as you’ve said, the parent company owns those tube sites anyway.

True story. But still, when you’re owned by the same company that also owns the reasons that you’re losing money like crazy, what else is there to do? Here’s where these crazy gimmicks pop out, in an attempt to re-gain attention and try to re-gain that same money you keep losing because of piracy. Don’t even get me started on bareback, it’s such a lazy cop out to mask the hideousness of the industry.

And who needs to do something about this won’t do shit ’cause it’s porn. I don’t see the light in the near future, if anything I keep seeing darker and darker.

I think what bothers me about stuff like this isn’t the kink itself, because everyone has their own things. But I hate this reality that these studios are out here continually presenting premises that are hokey, offensive, stupid, illogical, abusive and plain lazy to represent gay sex. People really thought barebacking was going to reinvigorate this industry and I’ve seen none of that. Studios would rather rely on barebacking and waste money on gimmicks then spend two minutes thinking about pairings, or simply shooting hot sex. It’s tiring.

I mean, you have people on this very update that find this “hot” and I’m sitting here thinking “well, maybe we kinda deserve all the bad things that happen to us”

I simply don’t recognize this, I’m thinking that gay pornography is way beyond fucked up than we actually see. If a studio like FraternityX actually wins an award then call me out, I don’t want that shit to represent me, my fantasies or just gay sex in general. To make matters worse is that there’s no one out there who wants to stand out, maybe Austin’s GISP is a good alternative but still they’re relatively small in comparison to other studios when it comes to resources and money, they all sitting there collecting those few dollars and not giving a fuck anymore.

I’m kinda annoyed by this.

Evil never dies. Or leaves your memory.

You disgust me.

Men In Stockings, 2010. Directed by Mr.Pam and Plucky Duck himself.

I loathe myself.

I know very few of LE’s scenes. The only model there I remember having stocking is Ashton Summers, and I might have misremembered it as his dancing pants. It’s probably older. Oh well.
Ducati? did as well? Didn’t check his site so I don’t know anything.

Now I kinda remembered Kink had several stocking-feet fetish videos as well. Why can I remember something I hate?

I know. If I’m remembering correctly Lucas had a whole series with men in stockings. And I believe Ducati did too.

There’s an entire market for crossdressing bottom on yaoi (fan) comics, which often involve panties. Unfortunately, both the target and the creators are commonly not gay men.

I’m not saying it’s OK since I personally hate it, just pointing out it’s a thing.

A post with no bareback banner over the corner of the cover image, no “raw” in the title, no “condom free” tag on the post, no reference to it in the description. The only way to know it’s bareback is to click through and look for the penetration, which I never do with this studio because they so seldom do bareback. I think this is deliberate but I don’t get why.

What is “sneaky bareback”?