MEN Series: Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter in ‘Pranksters, Part 13’

Pranksters, Part Thirteen (Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter) at Drill My Hole

Pranksters, Part Thirteen (Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter) at Drill My Hole
Pranksters, Part Thirteen (Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter) at Drill My Hole

Pranksters, Part Thirteen (Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter) at Drill My Hole

Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter in ‘Pranksters, Part 13’ at MEN.com:

On episode 13 of Pranksters, muscular Blaze Austin is giving his unsuspecting victims serious wedgies! Everything is going his way until he ends up on chiseled hunk Jake Porter.

Jake Porter happens to be wearing lacy, pink panties! Blaze Austin jumps back, but he’s actually turned on. Therefore, he follows Jake back home so he can get up close and personal.

Watch as Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter at MEN.com

Watch as Blaze Austin Fucks Jake Porter at MEN.com

No_No_No_Yes says:

Um.. LOL. Is lace going to be a thing? I am conflicted.

Scrapple says:

It was for Stevie and Don.

Tempest says:

As if I needed more reasons to not watch modern porn, here comes MEN with the daily reminder that this industry is so ratchet. Thanks guys!

Scrapple says:

The sad part is Blaze looks really good here and he’s showing a side he rarely displays. And if anyone deserves to get treated like a bitch, it’s Jake Porter. But the whole panties thing is stupid and I’m not even getting into the blatant message Men is trying to send. If you’re going to peddle stupidity at least do something different with it. Having the panty wearer turn out to be the hard hitting dom top would’ve been something. Not much of something and still a disgrace, but something.

elyp says:

There’s an entire market for crossdressing bottom on yaoi (fan) comics, which often involve panties. Unfortunately, both the target and the creators are commonly not gay men.

I’m not saying it’s OK since I personally hate it, just pointing out it’s a thing.

Scrapple says:

I know. If I’m remembering correctly Lucas had a whole series with men in stockings. And I believe Ducati did too.

elyp says:

I know very few of LE’s scenes. The only model there I remember having stocking is Ashton Summers, and I might have misremembered it as his dancing pants. It’s probably older. Oh well.
Ducati? did as well? Didn’t check his site so I don’t know anything.

Now I kinda remembered Kink had several stocking-feet fetish videos as well. Why can I remember something I hate?

Tempest says:

Men In Stockings, 2010. Directed by Mr.Pam and Plucky Duck himself.

I loathe myself.

Scrapple says:

Evil never dies. Or leaves your memory.

Tempest says:

I mean, you have people on this very update that find this “hot” and I’m sitting here thinking “well, maybe we kinda deserve all the bad things that happen to us”

I simply don’t recognize this, I’m thinking that gay pornography is way beyond fucked up than we actually see. If a studio like FraternityX actually wins an award then call me out, I don’t want that shit to represent me, my fantasies or just gay sex in general. To make matters worse is that there’s no one out there who wants to stand out, maybe Austin’s GISP is a good alternative but still they’re relatively small in comparison to other studios when it comes to resources and money, they all sitting there collecting those few dollars and not giving a fuck anymore.

I’m kinda annoyed by this.

Scrapple says:

I think what bothers me about stuff like this isn’t the kink itself, because everyone has their own things. But I hate this reality that these studios are out here continually presenting premises that are hokey, offensive, stupid, illogical, abusive and plain lazy to represent gay sex. People really thought barebacking was going to reinvigorate this industry and I’ve seen none of that. Studios would rather rely on barebacking and waste money on gimmicks then spend two minutes thinking about pairings, or simply shooting hot sex. It’s tiring.

Tempest says:

True story. But still, when you’re owned by the same company that also owns the reasons that you’re losing money like crazy, what else is there to do? Here’s where these crazy gimmicks pop out, in an attempt to re-gain attention and try to re-gain that same money you keep losing because of piracy. Don’t even get me started on bareback, it’s such a lazy cop out to mask the hideousness of the industry.

And who needs to do something about this won’t do shit ’cause it’s porn. I don’t see the light in the near future, if anything I keep seeing darker and darker.

Scrapple says:

I don’t think the piracy issue is connected to the fuckery. Because the gimmicks they’re implementing are cheap and uninspired. If they were really trying to combat the blood loss, they’d put some effort into what they’re creating. Or at the very least, make proactive efforts to prevent the piracy in the first place. Which they’re more than capable of doing, with varying degrees of success. But that’s not really a priority since as you’ve said, the parent company owns those tube sites anyway.

Tempest says:

Wouldn’t you think that it’s because they have little to no money that the gimmicks are indeed very cheap and just bland? Doing porn is no longer the final stage, it’s more used as an extra tool for sites such as OnlyFans and Cam4, even the escort business has more success than pornography.

With Falcon filming its first bb movie in years I’m kinda worried about the future but then again, these companies don’t care anymore so w/e

Scrapple says:

No, I don’t mean financially cheap. I mean creatively cheap. Latex masks, special effects, paying people who are essentially extras in the scene. That stuff adds up. They’re spending way more money than they would by just putting two men in a room and telling them to fuck.

jinger says:

Vomit. Is this supposed to turn gay guys on? This is what happens when gay porn is made by heterosexual dicks.

moondoggy says:

I hate sneaky bareback, except when Corbin Fisher did it back when it was still subversive … and frankly I hated it then too. It’s only hot as nostalgia. But I will acknowledge that I still find both of these guys physically attractive. It’s the pictures that got lame.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BlQ8VIQ_IRM/maxresdefault.jpg

elmtree says:

How funny, I was listening to music from the Broadway production of Sunset Boulevard earlier. Gotta love crazy Norma!

McM. says:

What is “sneaky bareback”?

moondoggy says:

A post with no bareback banner over the corner of the cover image, no “raw” in the title, no “condom free” tag on the post, no reference to it in the description. The only way to know it’s bareback is to click through and look for the penetration, which I never do with this studio because they so seldom do bareback. I think this is deliberate but I don’t get why.

Kj says:

I would rather see Jake Porter in a red speedo, but the man is hot no matter what. Blaze Austin and Jake Porter looks like a five star scene between two smoking hot men. Thank you MEN.

Tempest says:

You disgust me.

Kj says:

This might be something if you meant anything, but you do not.

Devin says:

Blaze Austin is already getting out of shape. Hasn’t even been in the industry that long. Question is, why is he topping? 😂😂😂

More says:

Exactly. His booty is amazing and should always be pounded. I was confused as well😂😂😂

emercycrite says:

LOL wtf is this