Who said this?!?

Well he got caught red-handed, so no surprise, he tries remove any evidence of his lies. He never was 100% gay.

>>This is the final time I will answer that question. Transwomen are mistreated every day in the porn industry, and throwing transwomen at gay men and saying, “they’ve got a penis, so the gays will love it” is problematic, especially when a website is sitting back counting money they get from selling ads of transpeople while their commenters call transwomen “he” or “it” or “disgusting” or “unnatural”.

—-Where did you even get this impression? Nobody on there is marketing them to gay men (and if you have a problem with that being on a gay porn blog, then I remind you that this page we are commenting on is a bi scene, not gay) and no one is calling them in male pronouns in the description either.

The rest of your comment is going to remain unread, because of you constantly demean my character than actually talking about the topic. Also, hating is not the same as disagreeing, I reckon people on here ‘hate’ you unless you have an actual impact on their lives. You’re way too emotional if you think they hate you for simply disagreeing with you on the past.

Well he’s being exposed so that doesn’t come as a shocker.

You’re going around in circles. You are not answering the question. Nobody is erasing trans people on that page, its literally called TransAngels. Nobody is marketing them as men.

Now, answer this simple question: What does your comment there imply?

(P.S. These random people are replying to my comment and claim of knowledge about the intent of your comment, I have every right to question their reasoning)

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8ebfe4d2f942a27ff87113e451ff21aa6e599184d9553f14e8d30a12da17dc63.gif

so what is he implying then? I saw him reason out that it means to “stop marketing transwomen as men” but if you go check the post nobody is even saying/implying that. The site is called TransAngels, nobody is marketing them as men.

no. he didn’t. you’re the one who’s implying.

but you already know that wasn’t what he was implying. and you want to know how everyone reading this knows you know that? because once you realized the screen shot didn’t mean what you thought it did you realized you had to make up a new quote.

so even though YOU’RE the one who posted the screen shot of what he actually said, fully aware of what the actual quote was, you suddenly changed the quote to this,

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c73b6ac398edd5251e05260367d28c528da2ca6c112fbda7a888d80fede86815.png

So how does it go against from the screenshot I’ve posted? He did imply to stop posting trans porn in here.

i’ve seen people do a lot of stupid shit on this site, but trying to pass off a fake quote that goes against the screen shot they just posted is pretty much the dumbest. congratulations.

How dare you come for Krysten Ritter like that! :P

Looks more like a blond Jessica Jones.

I don’t see how I started, I’m calling out this dude’s hypocrisy and somehow you joined in on the conversation and suddenly I’m the one who started something? If you can’t defend his actions (and yours) properly, you can stop pretending rather than go to an immediate withdrawal when people start to call out your BS. Have a good night, sir.

You literally did it first.

(And see how irrelevant your response is again?)

You can deny but the evidence is already shown above. 💁‍♂️

Although, honestly, you definitely need to learn more about “arguments” because you can’t seem to make a valid one. Last I talked to you, most, if not all, of your arguments are filled with irrelevance and fallacies, and now, hypocrisy.

And maybe a little therapy would help, because I seem to have “friends” you are seeing which I am not aware about.