Yes like pornhub, that you have the straight and gay version.

No one will care about WNB till it involves straight xxxers crossing over. Facts. 💯

Is this a new account you have here dude?

Facts!! Are you into this kinda porn?

If he’s bi or “into everyone” as he’s said on Twitter that’s his business but trashing a sexuality you were once part of is disgusting. He wont be remembered kindly for that.

Agree 100%. He literally said gays not into girls are misogynist & close minded. How abt he just say he’s part bi & respect ppl’s sexuality vs demeaning a group of ppl he once was part of and…actually got beat up for.

They truly should try advertising on straight sights vs gay ones to equal the playing field, otherwise it just looks like you’re trying to convert gays to being str8. Yuck.

Id don’t mind this though & hey folks, don’t assume WW is gay anymore as many times as he’s done this. Gay porn pays more than straight so he was been getting good $$$$$. He wouldn’t keep doing it & saying the stuff he’s said if he didn’t enjoy it. More power to him though.

Wow. That was a great summation. Really. Never considered straight porn always had a diversity in men. It highlights how stagnant gay porn has been in that respect as it’s a relatively new phenomena that only came about because of the internet. I use “only” because gay porn is/was marketed to a specific demographic and I believe the propagation of the Falcon-standard was, in part, purposeful.

You hit the nail on the head with performers who come in to do a job well. I see Dante Martin and know I’m in for a good time. Same with Aiden, Tom, and Connor at Corbin Fisher. But when it comes to longevity I wonder what’s the difference between the straight side and gay side.

I honestly don’t understand why it is so offensive to some people? I get that you aren’t bisexual and not interested in this kind of content but I get the feeling some view these posts as a type of insult. Waybig isn’t catering to straight people as they don’t have a straight audience this is obviously geared to the B in LGBT. I guess maybe the T might like it lol.

First, what the fuck would my sexuality have to do with anything I post? The fact that you would put pansexual in quotes followed by an “lol” is pretty rude, classless and insensitive. You’re so in your fucking feelings about dragging porn models who you don’t feel live up to the gay standard you’ve established (because you’re all up in their personal business to see if that standard is being achieved) that you are taking shots at people who, whether you like it or not or understand it or not, are a part of this community. For you to sit here and act like you don’t “get” pansexuality and not draw the comparison to how there are people who don’t “get” homosexuality shows how fucking clueless you are. So you can think my sexuality is pan, or woke gay, or what the fuck ever. I’m not clarifying or denying shit for you because it doesn’t matter and it had nothing to do with my original comment. A person’s sexuality and/or GENDER has fuck all to do with you, so why do you care how someone identifies? You want the freedom to live your life in your gender and your sexuality. What is so wrong with allowing other people that same freedom? Either we all deserve that right or none of us do.

And I wrote gender for a specific reason, which should be obvious to someone who doesn’t have a well-established chip on their shoulder. This site also produces trans content, which is why I mentioned GENDER and not sexuality. The entirety of that post was sarcastic, which is something you and your crusading cohort failed to realize. The fact that I mention check size and a “Pepto chaser” should’ve been a big enough clue, but I realize stupidity sets in when people are one-minded in their pursuit for vindication and condemnation. I also shouldn’t expect much from someone who has previously made disgusting and bigoted comments about trans men and women.

Please do better in the future. Or don’t read my comments. I’m good either way.

You mean fucking the opposite sex, not gender. But you are one of those “woke” gays or are you one of them “pansexual” folx? lol

You don’t know what the comment is going to say until you read it but you know what you’re going to see when you click on this link. My question is why are people offended by Bi content? There is an audience for this or the site wouldn’t exist and they wouldn’t post on this blog.

I can’t avoid it. Suggestion: put a separarte section for bisexuals, don’t get me wrong I have absolutely nothing against bisexuals but I’m not exactly here for that.

That’s what I’m talking about!

This is one of those questions I could write a sermon about. In fact, even though I’m going to try to restrain myself, I’m composing my reply in Google Documents before pasting it here so that I don’t risk losing it before I finish.

The irony of straight porn has always been that because the men are secondary, you get a profoundly broader, more diverse version of male beauty. I LOVE older men. I love chubby men with huge dicks. I love ripped guys with average dicks. I love when you look at a guy fully clothed and think, “Huh? You’re a porn star?” And then they take their clothes off and you say, “Okay, now I get it.” Their dick does not have t be the reason. In fact, I somewhat take respectful issue with Brandon85 … I’ve seen straight porn with a range of dick sizes, and big endowments are not that important to me. I think it’s fairer to say that you rarely wonder about a straight man how they got their job. To me, the thing we love about Ben Dover, Tom from CF, Bay from CM, Dante Martin … that kind of performance is more common among straight tops, who are there to do one thing and do it well. And when they are as good as, say, Peter or David or Josh from Sean Cody, there’s rarely that “he did five scenes and then disappeared” bullshit. They do 30 or 40 scenes or become the faces of their own brand and work for a decade.

It’s not that straight porn is never bad. (In fact with the truly amateur stuff like on xtube, I think it’s usually hideous compared to the gay stuff.) It’s that there is just so much demand that it is more abundant and better funded. And even though production might have been ghettoized to West Hollywood during the film era for both, I know of no time when all the men looked the same in straight films. But even though I loved the vintage days of gay porn, if we could bring back every actor who ever did a scene for Falcon, Catalina, Huge, Bijou, and Colt, and put them all in the same room, do you know how overwhelmingly similar they would all be? In the history of all of those companies combined, I wonder if we could even name double digit numbers of people of color? And Falcon alone has been operating for 40 years. They would only need one black performer per year to make what I said untrue, but they barely have one per decade in the years I was watching them.

I agree!

I get it, it’s just funny. And I get both sides of the argument. Heterosexuality is already omnipresent. so it’s a little annoying to watch prolific bareback bottoms fucking women. But I watch straight porn all the time because it’s way less limited than gay porn.

Straight porn tends to have bigger dicks. You don’t really see miniature dicks in straight porn.