WhyNotBi?: Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper in ‘Let’s Talk About Ass, Part 2’

Let's Talk About Ass, Part Two (Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper) at WhyNotBi

Let's Talk About Ass, Part Two (Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper) at WhyNotBi
Let's Talk About Ass, Part Two (Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper) at WhyNotBi
Let's Talk About Ass, Part Two (Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper) at WhyNotBi
Let's Talk About Ass, Part Two (Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper) at WhyNotBi

Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper in ‘Let’s Talk About Ass, Part 2’ at WhyNotBi:

Daizy Cooper is a long-haired ebony beauty with gifted hands, and today she’s going to share her gift by teaching hung stud Kaleb Stryker how to give an unforgettable massage. However, when Daizy leaves the room to track down a missing student, Kaleb can’t resist getting hot and heavy with the practice dummy.

As Kaleb Stryker stuffs his thick cock into the toy’s tight ass, the blonde and scruffy hunk Wesley Woods spies on him from the doorway. Wesley, incapable of resisting such a sexy sight, decides to sneakily swap himself into the dummy’s position!

When Kaleb Stryker comes back to resume his pounding of the plastic posterior, he doesn’t realize that he’s actually drilling Wesley Woods’ tight hole. The deception is revealed when Daizy returns, however, Daizy knows a teachable moment when she sees one and guides Kaleb and Wesley through a sexy and sensual three-way fuck frenzy that leaves everyone moaning, groaning and crying out for more!

Watch Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper at WhyNotBi

Watch Kaleb Stryker, Wesley Woods and Daizy Cooper at WhyNotBi

WhyNotBi Blog Banner #1
Darkhog says:

Haha Interins in heat!

CarlA says:

No comment, except……… https://media1.giphy.com/media/3ohhwxIMg9tz9rNsGs/giphy.gif

wdeee says:

Why click on the post?

CarlA says:

Why read the comment?

Brandon85 says:

You don’t know what the comment is going to say until you read it but you know what you’re going to see when you click on this link. My question is why are people offended by Bi content? There is an audience for this or the site wouldn’t exist and they wouldn’t post on this blog.

McM. says:

“ebony”

Scrapple says:

It’s okay though. Because Ebony Magazine. And because “ebony” conjures up images of regality and nobility. Like Wakanda. https://media1.giphy.com/media/7yprU0n7vuOKQ/giphy.gif https://media3.giphy.com/media/Rq3DocBeKMeRi/giphy.gif

wdeee says:

Blurring out women’s body parts is disrespectful, dehumanizing, and misogynistic IMO. Guys literally log on here and see dicks and assholes all day but “hide the children” when a woman appears once a week. It won’t kill some gay guys to scroll past a boob or vagina and I don’t care who disagrees.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/132f06357df57351e8062e1f9980e5e4d7ecf7861faad7f875fa61f918bc2ebc.gif

TJaa7 says:

I agree. what’s the point in featuring bi scenes on the sight If you’re blurry women breasts and vaginas? Women’s bodies are disgusting enough they can’t be seen?

BLACKjHAMMER says:

If they are going to blur out her Vag than why put her in the scene in what’s supposed to be a bi 3 way !!!

moondoggy says:

So not treating women as sex objects is degrading. That’s different.

https://i.aaronmbushnell.com/mulderokay.gif

wdeee says:

Yes because the blurring isn’t done to “not treat them as sex objects.” It’s done because the gays here act like they’ll die if they see a boob or vagina.

moondoggy says:

I get it, it’s just funny. And I get both sides of the argument. Heterosexuality is already omnipresent. so it’s a little annoying to watch prolific bareback bottoms fucking women. But I watch straight porn all the time because it’s way less limited than gay porn.

McM. says:

How is it less limited?

moondoggy says:

This is one of those questions I could write a sermon about. In fact, even though I’m going to try to restrain myself, I’m composing my reply in Google Documents before pasting it here so that I don’t risk losing it before I finish.

The irony of straight porn has always been that because the men are secondary, you get a profoundly broader, more diverse version of male beauty. I LOVE older men. I love chubby men with huge dicks. I love ripped guys with average dicks. I love when you look at a guy fully clothed and think, “Huh? You’re a porn star?” And then they take their clothes off and you say, “Okay, now I get it.” Their dick does not have t be the reason. In fact, I somewhat take respectful issue with Brandon85 … I’ve seen straight porn with a range of dick sizes, and big endowments are not that important to me. I think it’s fairer to say that you rarely wonder about a straight man how they got their job. To me, the thing we love about Ben Dover, Tom from CF, Bay from CM, Dante Martin … that kind of performance is more common among straight tops, who are there to do one thing and do it well. And when they are as good as, say, Peter or David or Josh from Sean Cody, there’s rarely that “he did five scenes and then disappeared” bullshit. They do 30 or 40 scenes or become the faces of their own brand and work for a decade.

It’s not that straight porn is never bad. (In fact with the truly amateur stuff like on xtube, I think it’s usually hideous compared to the gay stuff.) It’s that there is just so much demand that it is more abundant and better funded. And even though production might have been ghettoized to West Hollywood during the film era for both, I know of no time when all the men looked the same in straight films. But even though I loved the vintage days of gay porn, if we could bring back every actor who ever did a scene for Falcon, Catalina, Huge, Bijou, and Colt, and put them all in the same room, do you know how overwhelmingly similar they would all be? In the history of all of those companies combined, I wonder if we could even name double digit numbers of people of color? And Falcon alone has been operating for 40 years. They would only need one black performer per year to make what I said untrue, but they barely have one per decade in the years I was watching them.

McM. says:

Wow. That was a great summation. Really. Never considered straight porn always had a diversity in men. It highlights how stagnant gay porn has been in that respect as it’s a relatively new phenomena that only came about because of the internet. I use “only” because gay porn is/was marketed to a specific demographic and I believe the propagation of the Falcon-standard was, in part, purposeful.

You hit the nail on the head with performers who come in to do a job well. I see Dante Martin and know I’m in for a good time. Same with Aiden, Tom, and Connor at Corbin Fisher. But when it comes to longevity I wonder what’s the difference between the straight side and gay side.

J. 🍂🍃 says:

Is this a new account you have here dude?

Brandon85 says:

Straight porn tends to have bigger dicks. You don’t really see miniature dicks in straight porn.

Brandon85 says:

Honestly they can’t win. People bitch and moan when you censor out the women and also when you show them. I say show it and if people don’t like it don’t look.

wdeee says:

I agree!

J. 🍂🍃 says:

Facts!! Are you into this kinda porn?

pokok789 . says:

So still no update on Argos scene for Why not Bi?

Daniel Hayes says:

I liked Kaled when he was with SC, don’t care about Wesley Woods… And the story is so overused. https://media1.giphy.com/media/QN1rUjvEmSO1a/giphy.gif

Scrapple says:

I appreciate Wesley for helping illuminate the struggles many Gay4Pay models go through, fucking a gender they’re not into for funds and fame. By reversing that with his Girl4Pay work, Wesley is making it relevant to the gay community. Whether you’re straight or gay it doesn’t matter. What matters is the size of the check and the size of the Pepto chaser you take after performing your scene.

But I’m confused. Is Daizy supposed to be “I Can’t Stand the Rain” era Lil’ Kim, or “Love Don’t Cost a Thing” era Christina Milian?

Rockhard says:

You mean fucking the opposite sex, not gender. But you are one of those “woke” gays or are you one of them “pansexual” folx? lol

Scrapple says:

First, what the fuck would my sexuality have to do with anything I post? The fact that you would put pansexual in quotes followed by an “lol” is pretty rude, classless and insensitive. You’re so in your fucking feelings about dragging porn models who you don’t feel live up to the gay standard you’ve established (because you’re all up in their personal business to see if that standard is being achieved) that you are taking shots at people who, whether you like it or not or understand it or not, are a part of this community. For you to sit here and act like you don’t “get” pansexuality and not draw the comparison to how there are people who don’t “get” homosexuality shows how fucking clueless you are. So you can think my sexuality is pan, or woke gay, or what the fuck ever. I’m not clarifying or denying shit for you because it doesn’t matter and it had nothing to do with my original comment. A person’s sexuality and/or GENDER has fuck all to do with you, so why do you care how someone identifies? You want the freedom to live your life in your gender and your sexuality. What is so wrong with allowing other people that same freedom? Either we all deserve that right or none of us do.

And I wrote gender for a specific reason, which should be obvious to someone who doesn’t have a well-established chip on their shoulder. This site also produces trans content, which is why I mentioned GENDER and not sexuality. The entirety of that post was sarcastic, which is something you and your crusading cohort failed to realize. The fact that I mention check size and a “Pepto chaser” should’ve been a big enough clue, but I realize stupidity sets in when people are one-minded in their pursuit for vindication and condemnation. I also shouldn’t expect much from someone who has previously made disgusting and bigoted comments about trans men and women.

Please do better in the future. Or don’t read my comments. I’m good either way.

Dev.C says:

More Garbage content from this garbage site. How long is it until ms. Straight4pay is officially retired? Because I get physically ill every time I have to see her face.

Lukebrux says:

Why not bi? BECAUSE I’M GAY! I’m here to watch men having sex with other men!

inukaiser says:

like really besdies didnt Wesley retired?

joback says:

These boys were once cute… what happened to them ?

realitytvIV says:

Who’s the audience for this? Who asked for this? Who’s paying for this??? Why isn’t this website being peddled as hard on straight blogs/websites as it is on gay sites? This is exhausting.

J. 🍂🍃 says:

They truly should try advertising on straight sights vs gay ones to equal the playing field, otherwise it just looks like you’re trying to convert gays to being str8. Yuck.

Id don’t mind this though & hey folks, don’t assume WW is gay anymore as many times as he’s done this. Gay porn pays more than straight so he was been getting good $$$$$. He wouldn’t keep doing it & saying the stuff he’s said if he didn’t enjoy it. More power to him though.

SacsayhuamanAntoninus says:

Ummmm

Scrapple says:

Please leave me alone. Thank you.

J. 🍂🍃 says:

Agree 100%. He literally said gays not into girls are misogynist & close minded. How abt he just say he’s part bi & respect ppl’s sexuality vs demeaning a group of ppl he once was part of and…actually got beat up for.

J. 🍂🍃 says:

No one will care about WNB till it involves straight xxxers crossing over. Facts. 💯

Kanaka says:

👏👏👏

Brandon85 says:

I feel the same. There is a B in the whole LGBT although I prefer GLBT.

Lukebrux says:

I can’t avoid it. Suggestion: put a separarte section for bisexuals, don’t get me wrong I have absolutely nothing against bisexuals but I’m not exactly here for that.

Lukebrux says:

That’s what I’m talking about!

Brandon85 says:

I honestly don’t understand why it is so offensive to some people? I get that you aren’t bisexual and not interested in this kind of content but I get the feeling some view these posts as a type of insult. Waybig isn’t catering to straight people as they don’t have a straight audience this is obviously geared to the B in LGBT. I guess maybe the T might like it lol.

Adam says:

A separate section, but equal to this one, right?

J. 🍂🍃 says:

If he’s bi or “into everyone” as he’s said on Twitter that’s his business but trashing a sexuality you were once part of is disgusting. He wont be remembered kindly for that.

Lukebrux says:

Yes like pornhub, that you have the straight and gay version.

WhyNotBi Blog Banner #1