SeanCody: Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition)

Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody

Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody
Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody
Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody
Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody

Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody
Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody

Stu Fucks Blake (Pop-Up Edition) at SeanCody:

If your favorite classic Sean Cody scenes always leave you wanting more, this special pop-up edition is for you! Stu says with a wink, “Check out this throwback, one of my favorite videos,” as he introduces this classic scene from back in the day.

As you watch Stu and Blake ride their bikes and head back to the studio to get it on, keep an eye out for pop-ups that will teach you fun facts and behind-the-scenes secrets about your favorite Sean Cody stars.

Watch Stu fill Blake’s hole with a creampie because he just couldn’t wait to blow his load, and find out how to make your voice heard if you think the time is right for a Stu cum-back!

Watch Stu and Blake at SeanCody

Watch Stu and Blake at SeanCody

yeah I thought he was done with gay porn? and tried to put this behind him? if he’s willing to narrate, why not ask him back?

Maybe he will be back post lockdown? I can hope… I guess we all can

I hate the idea. If they’re serious about behind the scenes stuff, they could reach out to the former models who are still in porn shape and actually pay them to do naked on-camera commentary. They could sync it and do a split screen with current day Stu and Blake (alternating, not in the same room) on one side, and the archived scene on the other. The bonus would then be to see them cum one more time in the current day. Then they could get paid again without having to leave home, and subscribers would get actual new content, not canned spam.

Um, you’re not convincing when you gush over every single human being with a penis. You just look like a shill.

Hi Reilly9! When someone like yourself continuously throws out insults at someone they do not even know, they have invented, from within their own selves, who that person is. So, they are continuously either projecting who they are onto that someone, or confessing about how they are to that someone. The thought of “convincing” someone never entered my mind. It came from within YOUR mind. I simply saw the gif of Shia, read the positive comments, agreed and gave it not another thought. I’ve just explained to you Psychology: 101.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0e1d50f5ba9c8c1207100582c7c2e96d771ca49b75d9caf78b4f9f0abd721d38.gif

It’s narcissism when you think your looks and your celebrity are going to keep you from getting arrested, or excuse making racially inappropriate comments.

Not saying that he hasn’t grown from that experience. But narcissism and addiction problems are what brought him to that place. And alcohol.

No, I was speaking about his work (which come off as narcissistic vanity projects) in relation to your idea about SC updating old scenes. Then you made the “It’s not narcissism when you are this hot” statement, which is what got Shia into trouble. My original comment was addressing his art. Your response veered into his attractiveness.

My response was rooted in his attractiveness. Why else would I want to watch him watch a movie?

Exactly. Vanity project. “Look at me because I’m pretty.” But you just said we were talking about how he performs on camera. Which, that isn’t a performance, it’s him wanting people to look at him. I didn’t know if you wanted models who wanted to perform for the camera, or models who just wanted to be told they still matter and they’re still hot. Which is what a vanity project is, and why I asked the original question.

It’s a very Disney Channel thing. They do this with their popular DCOMs.

Yes someone had a conversation with him. He was offered big money, and he did it, but it was too painful for him to continue filming. I do want to see that unfinished, unpolished scene if they still have it in their vaults.

Hi Rockhard. If he was in pain, and had to stop, then most likely he would have looked like he was in pain, making a mistake and had to stop. Wouldn’t he?

Wow, that OP is kinda shitty…

But very interesting and sad to read. I wonder who his top was…

That was very interesting, and believable. There was so much detailed information someone would have had to have been much smarter than I want to give them credit for to make it up. THANKS!

Just curious who was topping Abe? Was it Brandon? Is Brandon from Puerto Rico? I thought his real name is Jeff Cope and he is from Wisconsin.

It was good to see that Stu, by commenting on this film, is not ashamed of his time doing porn and (perhaps) even embraces it. That is my “Pollyannaish” hope for them all. I appreciate guys who become porn performers but I also worry about their lives-after-porn, fearing they might become negatively affected by their past. What a GORGEOUS hunk of man Stu was, and Blake was (and still is) LUSCIOUS.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3de2411d845fc065ec5914b8498759382e5b0d2aed89606806aae3b998338e43.gif

I mean he’s a fitness model bodybuilding competitor now, I think he’s doing well post-porn.

This is a cute bonus idea, could be fun. It’s not really something I want to pay for TBH, but it is kind of cute and fun as an idea.

…admittedly, thinking about it… it is kind of hard to fully… ahem… enjoy porn while trying to read a bunch of pop up trivia, but I still think this is a neat and creative idea for a stuck time.

I’m not a fan of ‘pop-ups’ BUT I also think it could be very interesting having these guys remembering, reminiscing and commenting on their scene together. I am incredibly curious about the inner workings of the minds of porn performers because it is so beyond something I could ever have wrapped my mind around for myself, when I was that young. I appreciate them, and I’m also curious about them. So a HIGH-5 on the POSSIBILITY that this could be interesting.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d5f0aa61f50732ca91f9efb2ef9c2085a181a84d0219438cab38ee04968f74e5.gif

I wasn’t familiar with him, but I have been working my way through the catalog in preparation for a subscription, which I plan to get at some point. I am writing down performers that pique my interest, and there are a lot of them so far, with a long way to go.

Coolcoolguy just informed us that Stu bottomed 3 times. I thought it was only once. He bottomed for Spencer, Pavel and Tanner. Pavel was a super HAIRY guy. I’m going to guess they all were flip/flops but DUH! What do I know.? I do know that Tanner took an Internal in his update with Stu. I do know that.

LOL! Yes, it is yet another thing she has been dishonest about. I wonder if her clique knows what a loose grip she has on facts and reality. I just find it interesting that she would spend so much time thinking about us. After all, she acts so superior all the time and here is the “Queen” obsessing over us “common folk”.

They had time to put this together this week, on top of getting a new scene ready for release, but didn’t have the time last week? That doesn’t make sense. A hint of Stu maybe potentially possibly returning would’ve fit in perfectly with their “new and exciting” hype.

I know Sean Cody loves a good stunt, so I’m not sure what to think of the Stu thing. Last time I remember, he looked like Broly after getting hit in the balls. But here he’s back to his early Sūpā Saiya-jin look. That intro doesn’t look like something they would’ve filmed way back when, even though they were doing compilation DVD releases at that time. Seeing as how Stu said his was done before, and knowing how thirsty people can be, I would think they wouldn’t ask people to tweet about Stu returning unless that was already happening. It’s SC, so as usual, anything (good or bad) is possible. “How queer everything is to-day!” https://media1.giphy.com/media/11TjhQkLmM984M/giphy.gif

Current Stu has a tattoo on his forearm, this is not him. This is an old scene.

Edit: My bad, after watching the video and reading the description, seems like he still is kinda around introducing the scene? Weird? I don’t know.

It fits in with what I suspected. Stunt. But I’m glad Stu is in a better place with it all, though I hope he knows what he’s doing. That incident happened years ago, and fans have only become more ravenous since then. He’s opening that door up again and only time will tell if it’s a good idea. I’d say no. You see people have already plastered his IG info all over this page and we know plenty of people who read this site don’t know how to act or how to treat people.

It fits in with what I suspected. Stunt.

With things that’d happened, his only chance of coming back without creating so much ruckus is via niche sites with few exposures.

He’s opening that door up again and only time will tell if it’s a good idea. I’d say no.

I hope people don’t bombard him with too much demand and they don’t restart the whole posting his porn past on public again. That story sounds screwed up it’s kinda justified why he lashed out on some of his fans back then.

It has a good chance of happening buy hey, no harm in hoping for the best outcome, right?

Exactly. They should pay more attention to old scenes than us tbh. I wonder if the editors, when working in this pop-up nonsense, could catch how the work was done and how was so much better than the things they are doing now.

Ooh, fierce! Can you imagine?

Pop up 1: For this scene, Sean Cody hired hot models who were obviously adept at their sexual roles.
Pop up 2: The scene opens with the men doing seeming ordinary things to heighten the fantasy that this kind of sexual magic is lurking somewhere nearby, maybe in your own neighborhood.
Pop up 3: Here, Sean Cody hired a competent editor who would not butcher the scene with unnecessary cuts.
Pop up 4: Note how the men fuck in positions that people would actually want to adopt, not upside down or straddling a table with painful corners.
Pop up 5: Note how Stu cums directly in Blake’s ass. In the real world, the goal of fucking IS to cum, not to take a break and jack off for 20 minutes over somebody’s ass with a fake reaction shot to be filmed separately in a close up later.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bc0713eb5e3a6dd06f4401a953fddbcc802c267158d30ca57c2a9c57e1178839.gif

It wouldn’t be great? I suggest, if you have money, time and desire enough, you should run a studio as a side project, my friend. I can help decorating the sets :)

That is literally the only reason I fantasize about winning the lottery, current economic crisis notwithstanding. I am happy with my life, don’t have a lot of desire to travel, etc. But if I won a huge amount of money, enough to really not miss throwing a lot away on something silly, I would create a website called Cum From Fucking. And I would hire models for a certain rate and then make it clear to them that if they could produce a convincing internal or handsfree-pullout, I would double their rate.

Sounds great. That sort of reminds me…I stumbled upon Zane Porter’s escort page the other day. It expired last year and he isn’t based close to me, but to think I could have had that. I don’t know what is rates were, but I would happily plunk down a thousand for an hour with him. And he wouldn’t even to have to do any kind of oral on me. It seems like all the porn performers I would really want are all based on the west coast and east coast and I am here in the midwest. Apparently, Dawson from Corbin Fisher was doing it in Vegas fairly recently.

I’m sorry if I’m rambling. Haven’t slept well lately.

As a nerd, I do love behind the scenes trivia, just not during a scene. Stu still looks great. I am guessing his economic condition must be tough because he retired, not just from gay porn, the gay world. Hopefully, this means new scenes?

As I figured. He only did a solo video about 8 years ago. I didn’t pay a lot of attention to the solos, particularly way back then. He’s quite stunning. Thanks!

Chances are they were in their beginning stages of bodybuilding (1-2 years in) when they did Sean Cody. That’s why so many have the athletic look down it’s really preliminary. But then once that 3-4th year comes they start looking really different. Peep Collin Simpson, SC Joey, SC Stu etc

Doubt it. He talks about how much he hates his porn past and thought about thinking about killing himself.

I had a heart attack when I saw Stu’d name, of course he doesn’t look like that anymore, so it was an easy giveaway, but damn he’s the cutest little muscle guy ever.

Tehehehehe! Me thinks you are giving WAY too much credit to here as having any influence over the SC people. In fact, by now I would think they have probably learned to NOT pay much attention to the comments. I can not imagine that porn videos can begin being SAFELY filmed until there is a covid-19 vaccine, or (at least) the abundance of ACCURATE testing kits easily available to all, anytime. In the meantime, SC is running out of unreleased films so are apparently brainstorming for what might make the re-release of past films more than just a “repeat”. Will this idea excite or interest people? I have no idea. We shall see.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/16345e7ed3932d8cb92ccad53faae4ce6b9723e84f9c1e0ab4eb4fd36496a69f.gif

pop up says Stu had 54 scenes but I think he only had around 10. Are they keeping some of them? If yes, I hope they will be released.

Whew! Forgot how fine Stu was! He was damn near perfect, think he gained a bunch of muscle afterwards but I’d take him any which way!

Blake is always the perfect beautiful bottom. Stu is hot — I love his pecs with the big silver dollar nipples. Handsome dude too. New to me.

They flattened the curve alright. My excitement curve. Damn seeing Stu’s name had me hnggg!!! Hope he comes back! With all the daddy changes he got.

Was Stu one of those guys who got fucked once or twice but never sucked dick? Say what you will about Corbin Fisher everyone but maybe once sucked dick.

Jesus, I was already thinking about what a pathetic shell of its former self SC has become…and then they re-release this to rub my face in that realization. I thought they had gone way downhill the first couple years after MindGeek sadly acquired SC, but I never expected the pathetic depths they’ve sunk to over the last year. EVERYTHING was so superior before. The scenes that I thought were bad pre-MG seem like masterpieces in comparison to today’s SC. Before, they had hot guys (including some scorchers), passion, inventiveness, beautiful photography that at once captured the gamut from hot sensuousness to playful jockishness to lurid filth…all mixed in with beautiful and even romantic cliffside beach sunsets and waves. The videography, direction and editing almost made love to the models, and made you feel like you were pleasantly interloping in the middle of it all. There was SO much attention to detail, exactly HOW everything was captured, while making it appear natural and effortless. Asses, cocks, mouths, pecs, cum…they were all captured in a way that made them look so grab-able, ogle-able, lickable…you name it. And it was one of the few sites where the dirty director (or whoever that was) banter with the models actually added a lot to the hotness rather than detracting or making you cringe or think “please go away!”

SC circa 2010 to 2014 or 2015 was among the very best in gay porn; today’s SC is mostly garbage, almost embarrassingly devoid of everything that made the OLD SC scenes the ones that I go back to again & again.

They must be working on bringing Stu back because why else are they showing old clips of Stu with the STUpid pop ups asking is it time for a Stu cum back

Wait, was this the “exciting” reason we didn’t get a scene last week?

An old scene, now with writing?

Ffs, Sean Cody. This is abysmal.

Hi Elza, there is this little thingie going on called a global pandemic. I know; what an annoyance. Tehehehehe! About 80,000 Americans have died from it thus far and most likely about 120,000 (or more) by the end of this month. That has put in tiny “wrinkle” in business-as-usual, and most certainly in the filming of sex scenes. Studios are running out of unreleased films. I know, I know: they should have planned better ahead for global pandemics. 😇

I’m sure they have plenty of scenes saved up. And they’re on a much decreased timetable for release, anyway.

Sick of SC hyping people up only to drop something bloody boring.

And yeah, I’m well aware of the pandemic. I work in public health.

Tee hee fucking hee

According to another gay website, SC has only enough unreleased scenes to last until maybe August, if they release one a week. Other studios will be running out as well. So what you are “sure” of is apparently not at all correct. The belief that Porn Scenes would be the one and only thing not affected by the pandemic is bizarre to me. Just wait for the Fall TV season. Studios usually begin filming for that in early to mid Summer. As a Health worker you might can see how unlikely that will be. TeHeFuckingHe! 😂

I was thinking the “special something” was the well-known pornstar (secretly) joining SC and filming a 3-Way (according to another gay website) that will be released…some day. But, this is definitely “NEW”, so this might be it. It COULD be interesting, or it could be annoying. It depends on how JUICY and entertaining the behind-the-scenes info is. Or will it just be a “lame” attempt at justifying the re-release of great scenes from the past as SC’s cupboard becomes bare and it is not yet SAFE to start filming new scenes again?

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b02ce8319e76f1e14d37ffa5a116770b4231a9523bb1102acdb09c34f56aec78.gif

I agree, I haven’t seen Stu kiss anyone so much as he kissed Tanner…His first three videos (the threesome, massage by Aiden and bottoming scene with Pavel) he stayed away from kissing

Tehehehehe! He was a GORGEOUS man, from the top of his head to the tip of his toe, and when he bottomed those few highly craved-for times, the heavens opened, trumpets blared and a chorus of
angels sang, ALLELUIA, in a sound frequency only gay men could hear. I had thought he only bottomed once, but Coolcoolguy writes that it was 2 times. Tanner and Pavel were the 2 lucky guys.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8bd536ad776ce5ae579c29f31cf064a9ca046713af9252bf3870a179496e639d.gif

THANKS! I only thought he did a flip flop with Tanner. I need to pass that on to PineapplePassion. I informed him wrong. I should NEVER trust my memory or my porn knowledge (or lack thereof).

The only flaw with the Pavel+Stu scene, was that Stu hesitated to kiss Pavel. Pavel was yearning that kiss but Stu held back. Everything else was AMAZING. Stu reacted with pain and pleasure, exactly as a first-timer (so relatable). But who wouldn’t be in bliss with Pavel as your partner?

You do like to GENERALIZE and send people to Hell, don’t you? People can disappoint. Have you not disappointed? Some porn performers who “claim” to be straight may be jerks, and some who are gay may be jerks. Some who ‘claim” to be straight can be wonderful guys, as well as incredible performers. Some may say things they think will securely convince the “unenlightened” that they are not gay that they want/need approval from. I think being so critical of (and disturbed by) perceived character deficiencies in PORN STARS, straight or gay, is peculiar, unless you are dating or he is running for Political Office.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/625fcc96d6d40dede9c654f079d55de21636e5e9da9c03b3254622c38981c364.gif

Sending people to HELL is you “RESPECTING” and “ACCEPTING”? Racism, Homophobia, Xenophobia, etc. are what? It’s people HARMFULLY GENERALIZING about groups of people. It’s seeing a person as being guilty of being Black, Hispanic, Muslim or Gay. You are seeing people as being GUILTY of being STRAIGHT. Many Straight men are our friends and allies. From time immemorial gay and bisexual men have had crushes on straight men who tickled their fancy and then wished that they might be (for them) Gay for a Day. A YUMMY man is a YUMMY man, gay or straight. Homosexuality is defined as being attracted to people of one’s own gender. It’s not defined as being attracted to people of one’s own sexual orientation, only.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/88ac11350917b4a5b729a9587588eee566d537dd828841fe8ae6c3f8ee695da5.gif

“THEM?” Neither Straight nor Gay men are “THEMS”. The reason you are not being “understood” by me is I don’t see that you have thoroughly thought through what you want to write or understand what you have written. It seems you might be referring to something YOUNG Stu MIGHT have said??? If so, he may or may NOT have secretly meant it. He is a stranger to your personal life and you do not know the facts, events and circumstances of his existence. Fears for approval and survival are ALWAYS within us, influencing our WORDS and deeds. Taking something that someone might have said and making it his epitaph without evaluating the whole of him is hypocritical. Everyone, including you, has said and/or done something they do not want to be remembered and defined by. He was a YOUNG PORN PERFORMER, for gosh sakes; not a Rhodes Scholar, or a buddha intimately connected to ultimate intelligence and understanding, and free from ego constraints and regional, social and family conditioning.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70b26a1c03a75cd1306c16ef0097062a18c745791231b1e3d066b4e3e87bf60c.gif

What was that you wrote about “respect” and “acceptance”? Tehehehehe! I disagreed with you and questioned your reasoning non-rudely. You on the other hand………. You might want to GIVE to others the “respect” and acceptance you want for yourself. I will leave you with something for you to ponder. A synonym for disagree is not disrespect. It is part of the process to achieving understanding. For me there are many variables missing in the equation that is your “Go To Hell” argument that would cause you to flounder in a debate competition. Until next time……

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/373a9fe9e89a5a0084fa33d97d8460f2bb19b139dc23519f69ec4a3794438ae9.gif