Lucas Entertainment: BLACK COCKS RULE, Scene 1 (Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco)

BLACK COCKS RULE, Scene 1 (Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco) at Lucas Entertainment

BLACK COCKS RULE, Scene 1 (Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco) at Lucas Entertainment

Black Cocks Rule Series Summary: (Formerly Titled “BLACK COCKS MATTER”)

In “Black Cocks Rule,” (Formerly titled “BLACK COCKS MATTER”) Devin Franco serves up his ass to the huge cocks of alpha-tops Andre Donovan and Max Konnor. Dakota Payne gets his ass slammed by Bama Romello. Later, Andre and Bama go for a second round, this time giving Shawn Reeve a face full of hot seed. Max makes a second appearance, too, and it’s to rough up Aaron Perez tender little ass!

Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco in ‘Black Cocks Rule, Scene 1’ at Lucas Entertainment, Scene ONE Summary:

Over the years, Devin Franco has proven time and again his lust for taking lots of raw dick up his ass. But here’s his ultimate conquest: a double dose of raw black cock. Devin puts his throat and ass in the hands of two hung black hunks: Andre Donovan and Max Konnor. Andre, a Lucas Entertainment exclusive model, has plenty of fun sharing Devin Franco’s holes with Max. Max, who is a hulking beefcake with a rock-hard, battering ram of a black penis between his tree-trunk thighs!

Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco at Lucas Entertainment

Andre Donovan and Max Konnor Double-Penetrate Devin Franco at Lucas Entertainment

Jay M says:

Wait… WTF? Is this title real?

So we’re going to take a serious matter, a serious movement for black people and turn it into a play on words so this studio can fetishize black men? They really sat down and said, “Hmm, this sounds like a good idea! Let’s take a serious matter, where young black people were assaulted, profiled, and killed because of their skin color and make it into a joke about black dicks?” That’s really what happened?

Fuck you Lucas Entertainment. As a black man, I proudly say, “Fuck every piece of shit person that allowed this to happen with a big black cock.”
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bc4e9b7e88d9da9535227f24de8bf771b4d8d1ed28de7ceae9578badeff31ff4.gif

JK3 says:

ML is a bigot that occasionally writes for Breitbart, most recently opining that the firing of that Sloppy Cow Barr was a part of a liberal double standard (which tbh I’d love it if liberals/centrist leaning people in power leaned into this “double standard” as conservatives have done it and codified it since time immemorial). You know he jumped at the chance to do this.

NeAl1669 says:

I don’t know what to make of the tile but I can’t wait to see the rest of this movie. Hopefully its a series and there are spin-offs.

markjohnson22 says:

It’s ok to just say the title is demeaning, thoughtless, and inconsiderate. Why are we Americans more concerned about the person accused of racism than we are about the target of their racism?

yuuto sam says:

can we talk about that stupid title ?

I mean… we all are used to see black actors used only as a fetish on porn but what the actual fuck ? I’m not shocked cause the trashy CEO of Lucas Entertainment

Devin says:

How dare you. Michael Lucas is an advocate for diversity. I don’t see you saying anything about the racism over at MEN. Again, how dare you.

ajholditdownbaby says:

That title tho — da fuck?? 😒

Quinton Jackson says:

Right!? Just classless.

ajholditdownbaby says:

The blatant disrespect!

baz says:

Between this and Peter Fever’s “Black Panda” parody, I’m ready to have a gay porn hiatus.

markjohnson22 says:

This isn’t complicated: Michael Lucas long ago wrote that he wishes to be a Republican but he’s a pro-choice atheist. But he’s on board with “personal responsibility” and “bootstraps.” Those are code words for “black people need to stop complaining about racism and expecting the government to address it.”

So now he has been unmasked as an idiot. Black cock has always mattered, even to white racists. It’s the person attached to the genitals that doesn’t mean shit to them.

moondoggy says:

It wouldn’t have been my choice, but I’m not indignant about the title. I have a perverted sense of humor, so I’m inclined to give this some leeway. The pictures look amazing.

moondoggy says:

Not to put too fine a point on it, but know how far back I had to go on this board to find a black man in a Dylan Lucas scene? 2015. Know how far back I had to go for a Lucas Entertainment scene? Eleven days. I appreciate the points made in this post, but if we’re going to critique the politics of race in gay porn, let’s be fully circumspect.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/223224bd72d5179aa9c6ab3dcba1685313a677b0f954156482ce7b8a45c5c2b8.jpg

Scrapple says:

It’s Dylan Lucas. When’s the last time someone was waiting around for the next Dylan Lucas update? How many meaningless porn nominations have they snagged in the last three years? They’re not a high profile studio. They’re barely a studio.

moondoggy says:

I’m not the Bureau of Vital Statistics. :-P

Besides Helix, which I knew uses Corbin Colby, DL was simply the next studio down in the list todqy. Obviously I couls go back twenty years wirh Bel Ami and not find any. My point was that the criticism here seemed somewhat shallow in relation to this studio’s hiring practices.

Scrapple says:

The fact that Lucas hires men of color frequently doesn’t negate him being an asshole with how he represents those men of color. You can celebrate non-White men without turning to stereotypes, or disturbing titles or fetishism.

moondoggy says:

I don’t dispute any of that. But on a ranked list of indignations, for me, refusing to hire black actors at all is much worse than this.

Scrapple says:

I’d rather they not hire Black models at all if they’re going to blatantly disrespect our people and our history while stereotyping us and making a mockery out of social/civil rights issues which desperately need fixing. People are getting killed because of the color of their skin. Not just people who did something wrong. Innocent people. That’s not something you make jokes about to sell porn. Or sell anything. This is laziness, pure and simple.

Devin says:

Use that same energy whenever you see a MEN update with a known racist model like Paul Canon, Damien Kyle, Brian Michaels, Phoenix Saint, etc.

Scrapple says:

What makes you think I don’t?

markjohnson22 says:

BelAmi had their “mulatto” stunt a few years back with Austin Merrick. Besides, their brand is Eastern European boys, so the issue there wouldn’t be black models but Romani models.

But I gotta say, your whole “be grateful you have work” thing is a very low bar.

moondoggy says:

I don’t read any malice in the distortion, but “Be grateful you have work” is not at all what I said. I did not use the second person pronoun — I used the first person to express my preference: “I don’t dispute any of [Scrapple’s criticisms]. But on a ranked list …” of political offenses, for ME, getting to see black actors regularly is preferable to giving all- or mostly white companies a pass which is what most of us do every day here. We are only talking about this because he did something provocative, and I am only saying that for me and (apparently) for me alone, a whites-only track record is the more offensive thing. It is my personal preference and it has nothing to do with excusing Michael Lucas. Scrap has already said that he would rather studios not hire black actors at all than hire them and say something glib about them. I respect his opinion, but I can’t agree. Without the stupid title, this is a gorgeous scene (judging from the pics). This company promotes the beauty in black and brown men, and I will continue to enjoy that about them more than I enjoy the white shrines that CF, SC, BSB, BA, and Helix have always been.

markjohnson22 says:

I don’t argue with your personal preference, but you also wrote “if *we’re* going to critique the politics of race in gay porn, let’s be fully circumspect.” When you start speaking in the plural, that’s where my objection comes in.

But as for preferring problematic LE to the Ivory Brigade, carry on, nurse! I am just sad that erasure and insult seem to be the only options you imagine. Austin Wilde is doing way better at Guys in Sweatpants. Not whites only and not demeaning. And pretty hot, too!

And btw, I’m not Bair, but early Sean Cody was like early Fox network: many black and brown faces. They dumped us once they got on solid footing.

moondoggy says:

Erasure and insult are not the only options I imagine. I think Next Door has a bit of diversity even if it is somewhat ghettoized. Kristen Bjorn has some diversity, though specifically African American men are not an apparent strength of theirs. And there are other smaller studios (including GISP, though I’ve said — unwittingly to Austin’s face — that the production values need work) that fill in the visual landscape. Scrap rebuffed my Dylan Lucas example as being too minor, so I really was not attempting to address further any studios that do not release multiple weekly updates, which is the only standard I can think of to use to separate major from minor without appearing capricious.

I did say “we” in the sentence you quoted (which, I can tell you realize is still first person), but I ended with that line really more in the spirit of a suggestion, not an imperative.

Lastly, as for early SC, that’s good to know. But with two exceptions (Bailey’s Fuck Buddy and a kitchen fuck I can never remember the name of), I don’t watch their condom scenes. I am a big big big Landon fan — I can cum just to the memory of his scene with Lane), but their record strikes me as poor in the bareback era.

I think we have inched our way toward a rapprochement (I’m not trying to be fancy — I honestly can’t think of another word for it) on this, so I won’t attempt to reply again about the Lucas incident. But if you want to continue to reply about the companies that do good work with nonwhite actors and nonlatex sex, I can talk your fucking ears off about that. Rawstrokes deserves a mention here. I found a video on a tube site once that had some of the most gorgeous black actors I have ever ever seen. I wish I could have found an HD version of it but it’s really old.

markjohnson22 says:

For someone who can properly use rapprochement to make my liver quiver, I’m all ears!

You’re right about RawStrokes. And I can understand looking past LE’s purposely disrespectful title to see what will probably be a well-lit, well-edited, hot scene.

But in the name of Amerie, I do gotta call shenanigans on one thing that’s got me tripping. You said you used the first person as in ME. But the first person plural is I + You. And so you can’t claim you didn’t use the second person because it’s included in the first person plural. I am perfectly willing to admit that my paraphrase was hyperbolic shorthand. But I’ll die on the hill of grammatical analysis. -xo

moondoggy says:

When you say that you are included in “we” (I + you), you are making an observation based on perception, not on grammar. “We” does not equal “you” from a grammatical standpoint. Google it. Or, just as effective, listen to any Trump speech since he declared his candidacy. When he says “we,” he NEVER means me. The “we”/“you” divide is always on display when the you is me. I will now abandon that point before I sound like an e.e. cummings poem.

Hey, now there’s a cool porn name.

markjohnson22 says:

Nope and nope. We’re (you and I are) not analyzing Trump. Not on this here porn page. We’re (you and I are) discussing your “suggestion, not an imperative” : “if *we’re* going to critique the politics of race in gay porn, let’s be fully circumspect.”

Suggestions are made and commands are given by an I to a you. You may remember that the subject you is “understood” in an imperative. It is also “understood” in your suggestion, “let’s be more circumspect, (you and I).” This is not complicated, unless you also have an alternative facts interpretation of Al Green’s “Let’s Get Married.” The “you” to whom he is speaking is all over that song. And the you to whom you were speaking was all of us who made negative comments about the title.

markjohnson22 says:

Or, to misquote Teddy Pendergrass: “I think we (you and I) had better let it go.”

moondoggy says:

We are not amused.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3b7f7a319e919cb1c2d5dd1155cdf6ae9ab449d69e51db30061a36b3a30bb7f4.jpg

You can parse it however you like, but you’re going to have to cite a scholarly source to convince me that “we” is a second-person pronoun. But if it helps, instead of a suggestion, I’ll call it a resolution!

Devin says:

It’s selective outrage or fake outrage. MEN supports known racist models and I’ve never seen the same outrage or contempt from people on this board. Michael Lucas is one of the few, if not the only high profile Gay porn studio that has supported diversity and inclusion for many years. Michael Lucas would never sit in silence about racism like MEN does. Yet, people shit on him and it really baffles me how certain groups can do this to people who show them support. Meanwhile, the real racists are not being held accountable at all. I’m really starting to see why people are getting tired of liberals.

markjohnson22 says:

Speaking only for myself, I will say that I thought better of Lucas before this. But I have had to rethink his inclusion of black models now based on this move.

And before Lucas says anything about the racism of other studios or their models (which I see called out on this blog often, actually), he would need to do some self-examination on why he turned BLM into a reductive joke about black cocks mattering instead of black people.

Devin says:

Idk. I don’t support BLM. I absolutely will not support an
organization hell bent on calling out other races, but
completely ignores their own self destructive behavior. If cops were dropping Black people like flies it’d be a different story, but you know who is dropping Black people like flies every day? BLACK PEOPLE. I’m all about perspective and priorities. With that said, I do acknowlege that the title of this video is tasteless. However, Michael Lucas is not racist because of it. Insensitive maybe, but not racist. Michael Lucas has supported diversity since I was like 16 in High School. I remember watching his videos and seeing the world (Black, White, Latino) from all countries. No other studio was doing this and most still aren’t. He continues to be inclusive. The Gay community is not inclusive, so the lack of support doesn’t surprise me.

markjohnson22 says:

I’m so glad that the the only definition of racism is excluding others. Rosa Parks should have been happy she was on the bus at all. She was included!

And as for BLM, the point is to protest incidents in which the government treats black life as if it does not matter. When is the last time a grand jury refused to indict a black citizen who shot another black citizen who was unarmed? I’ll wait.

In the meantime… https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/04/why-dont-black-people-protest-black-on-black-violence/255329/

Devin says:

Did you post that article to show me that Black people do speak out against Black on Black crime?

JK3 says:

Michael Lucas has given several interviews to Breitbart and written stories for them in a similar vein so that bitch gets no leeway or the benefit of the doubt from me. Fuck him for that and fuck him for this.

Devin says:

Michael Lucas is an advocate for diversity. I don’t see you saying shit about the racism over at MEN, but you want to shit on someone who actually supports diversity and is against racism? Meanwhile MEN continues to hire known racists and their lack of accountability is not being addressed.

groovy. says:

there are no words. this is a new low.

Agnes Moorehead says:

They tried it…

DTG says:

No, no, no and no. Double-penetration is disturbing; iit’s like a step and a half away from fisting, which is grotesque. Plus I’m not at all feeling Max Konnor. The scene would have worked better with just Andre Donovan and Devin Franco.

Wahlberliner says:

Just when you thought racist Lucas couldn’t get any more disgusting, he releases a video with this name.

Devin says:

Michael Lucas is far from racist. How dare you. I don’t see you or anyone on this board speaking out against MEN for hiring known racist models. Somehow MEN is able to get away with their blatant support of racism, but Michael Lucas who supports diversity and inclusion gets thrown under the bus every time.

Wahlberliner says:

Thank you for sharing your highly individual and unique perspective on the world, Devin.

Devin says:

I didn’t say anything about the world. You seem confused.

Wahlberliner says:

Oh, and here I was assuming that disgusting racist bigot Michael Lucas is at least a human being, and therefore part of the world. Silly me. I should have noticed, as his impersonation of one is so bad. Thanks for the correction.

McM. says:

Fuck off Andre Donovan.

Fuck off Max Konnor.

You are both complicit.

C A says:

I think this is the first time I’ve seen a cock in Max Konner’s mouth. Shame.

slipperyslope says:

It’s entirely possible/plausible that they were hired for this scene without knowing what it would be called. Although given Lucas’ past/present/future bigotry, they probably should’ve known it would be something like this. :/

baz says:

This occurred to me too. I want to think Andre and Max did not walk into this fully aware that this would be the title. And I dread to see who else will be featured in this movie.

Curlee says:

At which point in his career did Lucas become so hopelessly tacky?

Scrapple says:

Fuck everyone involved with this bullshit, from inception to creation.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4811c2d79cf2bc9052cf6bbd01badd767bee091f03f2a80378e48449dc53e754.gif

slipperyslope says:

I look forward to the one with Jews in camps being fucked by the guards- they can call it “Schindler’s Dick”. Or the all-Asian one where they gang-bang outside and call it “The Dicking Fields”. Or the one where Michael Lucas is burned in effigy and a bunch of guys piss on the smoking remains. They can call it “Michael Lucas is a garbage human.” Just spit-ballin’ here.

Scrapple says:

Someone has already written all of these down and forwarded them to Lucas, hoping for a writing credit.

matrand says:

Delete if it`s too offensive: The title could be “Schindler´s Fist”

Sebastian S says:

That was an actual porn movie

BLACKjHAMMER says:

How about ML GETS HIS ASS KICKED STARRING all the people he owns money 2 !!!

gaycockluvr says:

I agree with you, but lmao at this gif.

Scrapple says:

Yeah, NBC really went there during that Celebrity Apprentice promo.

whodunit? says:

Still looks hot

nodoubtfan says:

Oh, fuck Lucas Entertainment.

Black cocks matter? Eat a dick.

Fuck that duck-faced loser.

gaycockluvr says:

You have to be kidding me with that fucking title.

Sebastian S says:

I hate the title, but not shocked by it, esp with Lucas. I hate more the ongoing fetishization of black men…oooh so this is his ultimate conquest. See how they makeit all about Devin getting raw black cock (versus the countless times he’s gotten regular white raw cock, I suppose). The two black guys are literally just meat for him.

This could be tons better with a different title and just highlighting it as a three way.

markjohnson22 says:

Besides the title, the description is a real peach, too. It’s not just campy fun. He says “in these politically heated times.” He knew what he was doing. And the “all black cocks matter” line is also a nod to “All Lives Matter.”

As I said before, he might as well have just said: Your lives don’t matter, but your cocks do.

treasuretrail says:

For the life of me I don’t know why black models even work for these companies. Black cocks matter? Blacks on Boys? Black gangbangs or rapes of innocent white twink? Blacks dressed in orange prison jumpsuits? I have seen it all. And the kicker is that much of the time when white gay porn sites dare even feature black models, there is a backlash of hateful, racist comments. (CF comes to mind). Then the black model vanishes never to be seen again. Sigh.

Devin says:

Funny how everyone is acting upset about the title of this video, but when I commented about the problem with racism at MEN you guys were nowhere to be found. You seem not to care that MEN has been supporting known racists for years. MEN obviously doesnt care. They’ve never responded to any of the numerous tweets, articles and petitions that have been created by people to remove those racist models. It seems to fall on deaf ears, both at MEN and by people on this board. The title in this update is problematic, but LE is not racist like MEN. LE features guys from all over the world and don’t support racism like MEN. Yet, you guys are more outraged by the title of this video than the continued support of racist models at MEN? What a joke. The selective outrage is tiresome. It’s hard for me not to speak up when something is wrong, but I may try to keep my mouth shut moving forward because why fight for people who don’t care?

jsn38 says:

I find it bizarre and quite phony that Max Connor has such a problem with people on Twitter referencing to his BBC but you wouldn’t tell this racist big lip mammal that you find offense to that title and refuse to have his name associated with the likes of him or his company. Let’s see how much ranting and raving he does or pleading of his “fans” to boycott duck lips once he either refuses to pay or short changes him for his work on this filth!

Devin says:

Michael Lucas is not racist. Why don’t you have that same energy when there’s a MEN update? MEN supports numerous known racist models and it falls on deaf ears for some reason. You guys are more upset about the title of a video. Sad.

BLACKjHAMMER says:

Lucas U RACIST BITCH GO FUCK UR-SELF !!!!!

Ivan Jimenez says:

Black cocks matter huh?

This is racst!

DavidMC says:

Devin Franco is taking so much dicks, not sure if ther’s room for anyone in there

Wahlberliner says:

He’s both. It’s his studio.