NextDoorSTUDIOS Signs Gay Porn Star Jake Porter to Exclusive Contract

Ben_theUNcoolhobo says:

Because studios pay for their updates to be featured here?

McM. says:

I see you.

Alann6 says:

You can keep your “queens” to your self.

TJaa7 says:

Lmao

Alejandro_87 says:

Oh, I don’t pretend innocence, but this is a rhetorical question; On the Confederate flag I was very sincere, weighed what i know from movies, friends and trips against a symbol that was taken univocably and clear. It wasn’t until then that I saw the treatment of the flag tattoo as something extremely unambiguously. Your suspicions, I asure you, are well founded, but I have to be clear: it’s not an act, its not criticism, nor something insidious or some veiled tendentious joke: I sticked to the subject, poking at the Trump voter predicate.

Alejandro_87 says:

You asked me to name one, I did. I didn’t say the “economy is great”. I didn’t even lay a zilch to back up my claim, you are simply begging the question. If my syntax leaves that impression, It may be because that’s the way I talk and in Spanish (and the way I think).
On trump’s record: I agree, the 5 elements are right, and I even agree on the ethical implications (on civil rights and bulk of families living and working off-coasts, as shameless and impossible to defend this overlooks by calling on “priorities first” or worse, saying this is not hurting anyone [civil rights rollback, in this case]). I am not from there, but you can’t appeal to personal anecdote to either enhance any logical, sensible, argument, and erode mine (for the lack of).
I just want, to be really forward, ummm, frank, candid, 2 things: being a supporter of Trump may carry some gross correlations in political character, but its dubious and stiflingly stereotypical, this is not a Traditional or Progressive Republican Candidate, and I despise his persona, its revolving to the point I can imagine he is like that in his private life >.< and, to re-assert that he is better (even if we measure by more welfare standards, then "lesser detriment") than at least Obama and Bush. We can say "ok, Obama got hit by the Great Recession", which would push me to remember Roosevelt and the Great Depression, and how he dealt with it, between 33 and 36, incredibly elaborate and truly heterodox approaches to economy and policing: by 1937 the difference to 1932 was staggering. Obama bailed the banks and set forth if not a mechanism, a tactic without strategy at that point, 2008, and why not, precedent for the next economies hit: Japan and England first, by 2010 it reached every country. Not to mention the "national security" hit from Bush's War on Terror epoch to the PAtriot Act, which are ALL in execution at the moment; The obama care itself is worse than the 2017 tax cut, and we can go on and on and debacle this topic into meager petty policing and "what if" and contextualizing de-contextualizing the presidencies. I thank you for that last comment, you were much more forthcoming, and precise on the critiques, I think we're both sensible people, "human too human", even though so different in personality and whatnot; I don't even want to imagine what would have been with Hillary as President, the whole Libya affair still gives me the goosebumps. On the bright side, the Entire foreign policy of USA was dropped, after 70 years of Marshall Plan, Cold war alignment, and Security Council sort of De facto hegemon of the "west bloc", IT's be good for USA, from the IRAQ disengagement to recalibrating who's who to America, bringing National Interests again to geopolitics. Surprisingly, the Rich people tax cuts did bring some industry back to the USA; and the best thing, although not his deed, both the parties had and have to reconfigure internally, since after Trump Foreign Policy cannot rollback, which for me will be the "legacy" infamous or not, of Trump. Ok, have a nice week, i'm glad i get the sense I sort some shit out and got your message on 2 levels that wasn't indicative before.

Alejandro_87 says:

wait, I didn’t noticed I deleted something. My last reply was the one starting with “you asked me to name”; what did I delete? (at this point, hell! even after your my second comment in this thread all got irrelevant to the Issue and the debacle got boring in a comment or two after)

Alann6 says:

You need to be gone before someone drops a house on you.

Alejandro_87 says:

How is Trump banning trans people of ANY RELEVANCE whatsoever to the Issue at stake? And even if, I’m spouting asinine nonsense, that won’t ever make the case either as a rebuttal of the judgement I accuse of being implicit in the complete disregard for something out of ethical/emotional grounds (“I don’t want anything to do with this Trump voters/semblances”), nor as -at least- reaffirmation of this accusation. I know it was very a condensed comment with too much going around and no resolution of any of the “problematic ideas” there: I tried to state just that, many predicates and ideas together yet disgregate, because I tried to exaggerate by mocking the same rhetorical devices used to, in the first place, hold together the motives for judging in the first place.