Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate’s Intimate Encounter!

Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!

Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!
Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!
Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!

Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!
Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!
Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate's Intimate Encounter!

Corbin Fisher After Hours: Barron and Rocky Tate’s Intimate Encounter!:

We’ll let ya in on a bit of a secret: while our After Hours episodes – with their intimate and personal feel, POV elements, and sensual lighting – are wonderfully popular, they also really take certain kinds of guys to pull them off. You can’t just throw any model into an After Hours episode. They only really work when the guys are next-level horny, natural born exhibitionists, know what they want in the bedroom, know what their partners want in the bedroom, and know what all of us watching want to see!

Well, Barron and Rocky Tate meet all of those criteria. As two of our more experienced studs – they each arrived at Corbin Fisher right around the same time and have been buds ever since! – Barron and Rocky Tate know what they’re doing, know what they like, and know how to get a fellow stud off. That they’re each also handsome as all heck, ripped beyond belief, and are each sporting huge dicks is all just an added bonus!

Let’s all get up close, personal, and intimate with these hot studs in some brand new After Hours action!

Watch as Barron Fucks Rocky Tate at Corbin Fisher

Watch as Barron Fucks Rocky Tate at Corbin Fisher

Young Neil says:

Barron is so hot… but this isn’t it for me.

Bair says:

I understand. I feel like I’m fumbling around in the dark to watch them. OUCH! I just stubbed my toe on that damn side table and the lamp crashed onto the floor. My Bad! Tehehehehe! BUT, two beautiful guys they are. Rocky’s body just keeps getting more and more supreme looking, it seems, and Barron is the embodiment of the Handsome FairyTale Prince.

“Someday my Barron will cum……and away to his castle we’ll go. To be happy forever I know.”

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/432bccbf69a22125018994f424195963eaa4f3e8f483e449439e446b173477df.gif

swan says:

I’m not a fan of Rocky bottoming, it doesn’t work for me.

Bair says:

I’m new to CF’s “after hours” scenes. I really like Rocky and Barron, but don’t like the darkened room. I get that it is the portrayal of sex in the middle of the night BUT I guess I need more lights turned on…as a viewer. As a participant…lights off. Tehehehehe! I think of Amy Schumer’s joke. She turned the lights off before having sex with her husband and he told her she didn’t have to do that because he loved her body just the way it was, every inch of it. She said, “Oh, you thought I turned the lights off for you not to see me”. Barron is particularly interesting to me, artistically. His face is so out of balance BUT it all blends together making him so strikingly and uniquely handsome. His hooked, Roman nose slants off to one side of his face. One eye and brow is lower than the other and the eyes are not equal in distance from the nose bridge, giving a different look on each side of the face. One side more introspective looking, the other more outwardly alert, but both sides together adding up to HUBBA! HUBBA! HUBBA!

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/06a1bb338a3e00b3b99f16c47d10a22733b760ec5e4fe47647c1292bdb817b04.gif

Quietist says:

Sorry Bair, but your analyses of the face is hilariously stupid. You definitely have no idea about symmetry and perspective (in the graphical sense).

https://media4.giphy.com/media/aLL1zyt94ku7uhXzvI/giphy-downsized-small.mp4

Bair says:

I’m intrigued by Barron’s face. He reminded me of Lauren Hutton, a very famous model from a long time ago. My art teacher was intrigued by Lauren’s face and brought pictures of her to class to point out facial dissimilarities to look for when doing a portrait, along with photos of more recent celebrities, including Channing Tatum. The slant of Barron’s nose is more dramatic, but Lauren’s nose was wider and fuller on one side, and more bulbous. Creating a slant in that way. On the fuller side of her nose her eye sat lower than the other, and closer to the nose bridge. The higher eye also had a more dramatic, uplifting brow arch. One side of her face has a sweeter, softer and more subdued look. The other side a brighter, more glamorous and intense look. It’s just an interesting similarity (to me) between handsome Barron and beautiful Lauren.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/924135a91fee80b536e133d0be7a50602846e3182f6e575097af430f6366da66.gif

Quietist says:

You should have paid more attention to your art teacher.
The photo of Barron you used is not suited for this kind of analysis.

Bair says:

It is a perfect photo for the SIMPLE analysis that I made. Take a sheet of paper and cover one side of his face at the center line and look at him. Then cover the other side of his face at the center line and look at him. The rather extreme nose slant and the dissimilarities in the positioning of the eyes creates two very different faces. Both Nice. When visually joined into one the two differing faces create a very intriguingly handsome man, to me. If you need to make something simple, complex, then do so. Remember that INSULTS are cheap. Anyone can throw them out and PRETEND that they know what they do not. Instead, just……..SHOW ME!

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/15e6caf12ca927a02add425c2cf098ea416df9dc9a8b8401975e6deceaaa93a8.gif

Quietist says:

Don’t know why I’m doing this, but here it goes.
To do a facial analysis like you tried to do, it’s absolutely necessary to use a photo that shows the face perfectly full frontal, looking perfectly straight into the camera. Like the one of the girl in the magazine, that you used trying to make your point.
It wasn’t easy to find a suitable picture of Barrons face, but I think this one comes close to what is needed.

And see: there is very little out of balance in his face. It’s very symmetrical, which is a feature that is supposed to – at least partially – define beauty.

And now … back in your cage.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bb1df63a4428cc4f6f98792d55ed114caac011fc2bfc2628e8a456dd298c5c66.jpg

Bair says:

Of corse not, with the THICK lines you used. In a picture that small the lines MUST be thin, like the ones I used. We are talking MILLIMETERS. Millimeters HIDDEN beneath your THICK lines. Even with your THICK lines you can see the nose slants to the left of the page. Measure from the edge of the nose at the nostrils on each side to the center line and you will see there is MORE nose to the left of the line than the right. AND you can easily see (with your eyes) that the eye to the left is CLOSER to the center line than the eye to the right. AND even with the THICK line you can see the eye to the left is higher than the eye to the right. You can see more exposed eye area above the THICK line than with the eye to the right. MILLIMETERS in a photo that small could equate to an inch or more on the actual person. And what is it with all the insults? Did you have a BAD day? Do you feel better now? I’m glad I could be of help. Is it upsetting to you that I’m PRAISING how uniquely and interestingly handsome someone is? Too much positivity for you?

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/974722052a8a155ef2258b3665eb0953c334825be7bf45c79d5e4156705b5c18.gif

Bair says:

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a lot of nostril outside the line. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is closer to the nose. A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than eye to the left. I had thought it was the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the left to the nose was throwing me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Bair says:

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a lot of nostril outside the line. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is closer to the nose. A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than eye to the left. I had thought it was the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the left to the nose was throwing me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Bair says:

Using THIN lines, a line from the inner eye to the right, downward, has almost NO nostril outside that line. On the left there is a chunk of nostril outside the line showing its slant. Milligrams in a small photo can equate to an inch or even more on the person. The line on the left is much closer to the center line than on the right, showing that eye is much closer to the nose. A perpendicular line THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line. Showing it is higher than the eye to the left. I had seen it the other way around with your THICK lines. The closeness of the eye to the nose on the left must have thrown me off, visually.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1405a73b72397b9fda6630410becee41e005982b8293f56b384d4ad254eb21d.gif

Quietist says:

In your first message with the facial analysis you said.

His hooked, Roman nose slants off to one side of his face.

In your new picture your middle vertical (THIN 😏) line, proves you were wrong.
Just like the not so thin vertical line in my picture did.

You also stated:

One eye and brow is lower than the other

You chose not to draw a line along the eyebrows in your new picture, but if you would have done so, you again would have proven your own wrong. Just like I did. Just consider the lower edge of my ‘horizontal’ yellow line as if it were a THIN line.

Now you said:

A perpendicular line running THROUGH the eye to the left shows the right eye almost completely on top of that line.

This so called ‘perpendicular line’ is not tilted in the same degrees as the face is tilted in the picture, so you are cheating!

Your new vertical lines through the corners of the eyes are dubiously placed.
But I’m done with you seeing ghosts, bye, have a nice day.

Bair says:

The differences in Barron’s face are OBVIOUS. Are you able to look at Barbra Streisand and notice she has a large nose? So often a female celebrity will talk about wanting to be filmed and photographed on their “good side” (i.e. Mariah Carey). It is RARE that someone has no differences between the two sides of their face. R A R E! But In spite of Barron’s OBVIOUS differences, your position has become that he is a RARITY and has NO differences. Tehehehehe! That would be funny if it were not SOOOOO funny. The highlight in the center of his nose reveals the OBVIOUS slant and then CURVE back at the tip. Hold a small square sheet of paper against the center line in my diagram and you will see the perpendicular line is near perfect. If it were a trick it would have to be slanting OBVIOUSLY DOWNWARD for the eye to the right to be on top if it. It is actually slanting VERY SLIGHTLY upward. The line to the left is OBVIOUSLY closer to the center line than the line to the right. The lines at both eyes start at their inner corners. The diagram just shows what is OBVIOUS.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/003ae0a74cc2ea293d899d0003c53941aa554a6ab0e2bf39116b809a832672a9.gif

Young Neil says:

Yeah, lights off videos is a little too much. Maybe just fake it like a movie would or something, or transition back to lights

JJ says:

How I wish Barron fed Rocky cum straight from his cock into Rocky’s mouth!

Curlee says:

Oh we are returning to the After Hours scenes, eh? I think its been 3 or 4 years since the last bunch.I’m not disappointed though. And Barron looks exceptionally hot in this one.

moondoggy says:

I was very resistant to them when they came out. I thought that it was just a way to make studio porn look more like xtube or OF porn, which for me was defeating the purpose and regressing to the mean. In my defense, I think maybe I was right about their motives, and I also think that screenshots are not the best way to experience those scenes. That’s a long prelude to admitting I was soooo wrong to be so resistant to that series. Whatever their strategy was, they combined the “edgy” lighting with greater sexual intensity. It didn’t just change the mood visually, it changed how the performers engaged with each other for whatever reason. And though dim lighting does not make a good scene, they didn’t merely turn the lights down. It was more artistic than that, as I think the pic below somewhat captures.

As for Rocky and Barron, they both came in close proximity with no edit after Barron pulled out. Of course that’s the foremost way to get my attention! I’m not sure when I’ve seen Barron do that, but I admit I never clicked with him the way other people did and may not remember his scenes accurately.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1a6f7b7103edcb724dd8544a2ac6b4fd4e0529b9c2f6faacbcc1f7158b8ead2f.png

Kj says:

Handsome Barron, and his awesome nipples, are always welcome.

Anthony says:

I’ll never, never, ever gonna get tired of Rocky. He’s always a yes for me! And with Barron? Heck yeah!

bo69 says:

And when Rocky wants cum he doesn’t waste it, he is soooooo good. Wouldn’t be shocked if these two were buds off camera.

sasuk388 says:

FUCK yes . i could care how may times this is repeated i dont give flying fuck . other than Barron needs to bottom again