CorbinFisher: Truman Takes It Deep (from Jacob) (Bareback)

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4766b50d6e0687fda39d58891676f6838ea15739c8c53321119bd097b0fe937e.gif

That’s me in the blue.

What a joke. This was originally released in 2014!

Too boring

I can only hope that this is the end of this straight porn site.

That scene is hot as fuck 🤤 One of my favorites!

That was one of Cain’s hotter scenes. Did Taylor ever appear with anyone else?

You know this Wednesday will be his third fish scene, and then two scenes of Kenny and Henry fucking each other.

He’s so cute! All I need from him is one long gay kissing scene and I’ll be solved.

Damn. Harper was so animalistically hot.

I don’t recall vaginal rejection being the reason why Taylor left. From what I remember he wasn’t really comfortable with the barebacking.

Shame. He was so hot getting it from Cain!

The totally gay models at Corbin Fisher do NOT have to f- -k fish and are asked back many times. Examples: Quinn, Hugh and Calan. The only models that f- – k fish in Corbin Fisher scenes are the models that are either straight or bi (which is most of their models).

If you’re implying Quinn was eating pussy in one of those bi scenes, that never happened. I can’t even remember if he kissed one of those girls or got a boob grab in.

No, it’s not a fact. It’s an assumption. He was there for five plus years and did three bi scenes. And a knife was held to his throat every time? He continued to stay with the company which forced him to engage in forced sex acts? Lets be real.

What’s funny is how Jason somehow has the power to “force” gay models to perform with women, but he can’t “force” straight models to perform with men. How does that work exactly? Hypnotism which only works on gays? Call a thing a thing and be done with it.

You mentioned how hot Cain’s scene was with Taylor. I don’t see you saying anything about him being forced to do that. Was it force when Connor, Harper, Kent and countless other models who self-identify as straight performed gay sex acts? No, it wasn’t. But suddenly if a gay-identifying model even appears in a scene with a woman he was coerced, manipulated, held at gunpoint, or whatever other excuse people want to come up with. It’s ridiculous, sloppy, hypocritical and asinine. If it’s okay for a straight guy to experiment with gay sex, why is it not okay for a gay model to do the same? A double-standard is a double-standard. And in the end, what the fuck does someone’s sex life have to do with you? Did Quinn’s appearing in scenes with women destroy your quality of gay life? If it did, maybe you’re taking your porn a little too seriously.

Given some of the vicious comments models like Alexander Gustavo and Arpad Miklos had to endure for venturing out of the gay lane, maybe it would be better to not give so many fucks about how people express their sexuality. Or maybe don’t even look at those models, just look at what happened on this site with Clay. All those guys took their own lives, and nonsense like this is what contributed to it. People who have lives aren’t worried about what some random stranger is doing with their sex organs.

Right. So now we’re saying experimentation isn’t a thing. Okay.

I do agree. It’s not like a gay guy has ever experimented with gay sex and came to the realization he’s gay. Everyone knows who and what they are when they reach the age of sexual maturity. Because that’s how it works.

I think it’s terrible that like Quinn and Hugh (wait, can’t count him because he came to the site with pussy experience) and Weston (wait, not him, he didn’t do any bi scenes) and Calan (hmmm, not him either) you were forced to endure a porn environment where pussy was put on a pedestal and gay behavior was prohibited. Given your repeated feelings about various studios and models, I think it would be a wonderful for you to let people know which studios and models you think are acceptable. Think of it as a public service. We need to know who these sites and models are so we can support them for being gay positive and gay affirming.

I don’t think Tim Tales does any of those things but they’re still branded as homo haters. Weird.

So no list then. Alright.

Please tell me where you found the patience to have a conversation w/ someone describing experimentation as PC “Conversion Therapy” and Timtales as homophobic.

My lack of patience is what motivated that exchange. It’s 2018 and I’m done putting up with hypocritical bullshit.

It’s 2018 and you still defend closet cases.

Nothing about Tim Tales is quasi-straight. A case could be made for why the tops don’t do more than they do, but that’s not the equivalence of homophobia. You keep bandying that word around and it doesn’t sound like you know what it means.

Nope. I defend people’s right to live their lives however they see fit. And identify however they see fit. I also reserve the right to snicker when those identifications don’t align with the images being presented on camera. I wasn’t pulled out of the closet. Why wouldn’t I offer other people that same common decency?

It’s so exhausting reading the same tired nonsense. As if it’s so hard to be gay and not walk around with a grudge against bisexuals, heterosexuals and women. It reeks of jealousy.

Who told you to like it? And just because you don’t want to be anywhere near one, that dictates that all other gays must feel the same? And any time one does it’s because he was forced? Maybe you don’t realize how crazy that sounds, but it is crazy.

The definition of gay dictates lack of attraction to vagina. Trying to alter that definition by mixing it with different degrees of bisexuality is really crazy.

You’re right, because “masculine” and “feminine” are only applicable in hetero sexual relationships. There are no such thing as “masculine” lesbians. To say nothing of “masculine” trans men.

And the reason you don’t see more “feminine” men topping is because whenever that does happen, people have shit to say. It happens all the time with Helix. It happened every time Landon Conrad would top. People have fucked up views about sex roles. Tim recognizing that doesn’t mean he’s promoting homophobia. And that is a ridiculous statement.

And just like some straight people come to realize they’re really gay, there are some gay people who come to realize they’re really bi. I’m not sure why that’s so hard to comprehend. Just because it’s not true for you doesn’t mean it’s not true for other. But in your narrow mind it’s all or nothing. “Quinn stated he was gay, so him kissing a woman means Jason threatened him into doing it.” Sure, lets go with that, as opposed to believing maybe he wanted to try something he hasn’t tried before. Because nobody in the history of mankind has ever tried something new.

Please do yourself a favor and look up what homophobia means. It most certainly doesn’t mean “Depicting a fisting bottom as masculine top.” Knowledge is Power!

Also, thank you for contradicting yourself so perfectly. You’re mad that feminine guys are relegated to bottom roles, but you’re also mad a fisting bottom is masquerading as top. Sounds fair.

Outdated and heterosexist depictions of gay sex are homophobia. Just like blackface is racist.

I’m on a porn site bitching about porn sites abusing gay models, promoting straight sex and recycling old content. How is that “jealousy”? I’m certainly not jealous of Jason’s “straight” fetish, his support of NRA and GOP and his progressing dementia.

Nope, you’re on a porn site bitching about abuse you have no proof of. If you’re so concerned about Quinn’s mental well-being, why not contact him. Or better yet, call the police and tell them how he was sexually assaulted. Should be an open and shut case since it’s on video.

You know all of Jason’s business and yet you’re not obsessed or jealous? And you’re spending all of this time on videos related to his site. And talking wistfully about models like Taylor. Yes, your disgust for all things Gibson is very apparent.

I state that I’m upset with Tim’s strict man-woman dynamic. I absolutely do not oppose fisting bottoms topping, I oppose them taking very limited “strict top” role after years of showing their versatility and Timtales promoting that kind of heterosexist fantasy.

Right, because strict tops and strict bottoms aren’t a thing in gay nature. When you’re gay you do it all. All the time. And if you don’t it’s because you fall into the role of being the man or the woman. Makes sense.

And yet you don’t have list of people or studios porn purveyors should be focusing on. If you’re not part of the solution, you’re just bitching about the problem. But whatever. Some people use bitching as a smokescreen. And sometimes you need that smoke when you’re watching scenes from a studio you’ve marked as being homophobic.

And once again you’re jumping to conclusions without a valid basis. That’s bad for your ankles.

If a gay person realizes he or she is really bi, I’m not sure how much of a cure that is. They’re still not straight.

Some heterosexuals and women really did a number on you. For that, I’m sorry. But either you put on your big boy pants and get over it, or don’t. Looking for slights that aren’t there isn’t healthy.

Being gay pornstars means you should be doing it all on camera. But in reality gay porn is the only job where you can refuse to do anything and still get paid.

Small spanish studios like Menatplay are good, Mormonboyz used to be good before it went downhill. Unfortunately gay porn production is still in the hands of straight homophobes like MEN or old white self-hating conservative men. Jason is just most notirious of them.

Actually most conversion therapy advocates like Ted Haggard admit they still have feelings for men. I’m not sure why you don’t know that.

You can’t compare a closeted bi guy who finally stopped repressing his gay side to that.

You’re right. And Ted Haggard identifies as bisexual.

Not everyone who comes out of the closet realizes they were in a closet in the first place. Just something to think about.

So asking a gay porn actor to actually have gay sex is rape culture?

Assuming a model being gay means he does it all, and his gay status REQUIRES him to do it all on camera even though he may not want to is indeed promoting rape culture. Telling someone they have to perform certain sex acts based on their sexuality is pretty disgusting. It’s a shame you don’t share the same concern for these gay models that you seem to have for Quinn.

How is a subscriber forced to subsidize their straight site, you either choose to subscribe to their straight site or not. You come across as extremely closed minded.

Straight site is included in package which you have to buy or you need to pay $100 exrtra for only gay content.

There’s nothing sadder than uneducated, messy people who don’t realize they’re uneducated and messy.

And did you really give me a compliment while using a gif of a kid who may be biracial? I approve. If we’re going after messy, uneducated gays we might as well trigger the bigoted gays too. They tend to eat at the same lunch table.

Asking a gay porn actor to do his job is not a rape culture. Quinn didn’t apply to Brazzers pussy gangbang.

If you choose to sub to only gay site you have to pay $100 more

You really need to learn how to do maths.

The Corbin Fisher site yearly subscription is 199. The ACM site yearly subscription is 259. 259-199= 60. 60 is not 100.

Also, if you’re at the porno drive-thru with your credit card thinking “Gee, I only want the dickburger, but if I get the pussy value mean I’ll save money, so I’m going to go with that even though pussy makes me sick” you’ve got some fucked up priorities. And probably a fucked up bank account. Maybe choose that over the porn.

You’re not interested in the content. But you’re mad about the pricing structure. Sure.

Yes, they are offering their gay subscribes to subsidize their straight content or pay more for a privilege of not seeing woman parts in their porn. I don’t take it. Less and less people are taking it. And I’m glad to see that.

Maybe some of th.eir subs are bi

There a thousands of str8 sites for their liking. Corbin Fisher doesn’t even produce bi content anymore if you don’t count Henry/Kenny tag Jamie “bi” scenes.

You don’t get to decide what people want to watch, if they want to see the stuff produced by Corbin Fisher then let them. It’s a good deal for people who want both. They still produce bi scenes.

They are not forcing anything on anybody.

Satire. Another word you are misusing if you think that’s what MormonBoyz is doing. I guess MormonGirlz and Family Dick is also satire promoting healthy gay relationships.

Yes, 2015 was ages ago. I think we still had dialup then.

The struggle is real.

Maybe Waybig should promote scat porn too? I’m sure you wouldn’t mind scrolling through these updates.

Worse

I think “gay porn blog” is not a grey are. And gay scat porn would be more theming than dick in the pussy.

Just get help.

You certainly do.

MormonBoyz always had the same mission statement.
And a lot of those early models identified as “straight.” Also, if a parent company owns two sites and you’re subscribed to one of them, you are essentially subsidizing the other. Whether you choose to acknowledge that or not, it’s still the case.

And how many straight guys was it prior to 2015? Wait, don’t answer. I know math is not your subject.

So one scat scene a week wouldn’t bother you?

I don’t know what math do you use but one straight guy in 2015 and a few before don’t match with “pray the gay” away camp of straight guys at CF

Yep. Only a few. And it’s nice to know Johan Kane, who had a MAP scene released only a few months back, is an out and proud gay man.

Yep, and that’s why the write-up for that scene said he describes himself as “straight but curious.”

Next indeed.

Oh, so he’s one of those gays who does it all. Cool. And the site marketed him as bisexual/curious for some reason? That’s terrible. You should be outraged.

You should be outraged they tried to market a not straight guy as straight. Conversion therapy and all that.

Oh, I forgot, your gay sense of morality rests on a sliding scale. My mistake.

Yes, nothing wrong with presenting the idea a bisexual man is straight. Because it’s only wrong if there’s a pussy present. Got it.

Nobody’s saint, unfortunately. But Menatplay’s “sins” pale in comparison to a big pile of homophobic shit that is Corbin Fisher.

The first official bareback scene was the one with Dawson and Cody way back when. Not sure of the date.

Because it’s tacky. But by all means, do you. If you want to think you were birthed from a disgusting act, thereby making you disgusting, go right ahead.

Your insistence on equating vaginas with dogs and feces is pretty telling. Thank you for being a walking stereotype. Our gay youth needs more people like you. Cautionary tales work wonders.

I’ve already got my notepad and sketch book. You should see about getting a doctor’s note now, on account of your delicate stomach.

I disagree with the idea that exploration is only sex positive if it relates to homo sex. If you’re gay and you want to try pussy, go for it. If you’re straight and you want to try dick, go ahead. Offering something different and forcing someone to try something different are two separate things. It’s no different than going to a buffet and the server offers you a food item you don’t usually eat. Eat it, or don’t. The offer in and of itself is not a scheme to bring about conformity.

I also disagree with the idea that straight sex equals conformity. There are plenty of straight couples who have no idea what conformity means. And reinforcing the idea that straight automatically means “normal” is a problem.

But that’s the same ideology that says if you’re gay and you want to get married or have kids you’re trying to emulate a hetero ideal. I don’t buy into that.

Death Note?