HairyBoyz: Jake Deckard (Set 5)

Jake Deckard (Set 5) at HairyBoyz
Jake Deckard (Set 5) at HairyBoyz
Jake Deckard (Set 5) at HairyBoyz

Jake Deckard (Set 5) at HairyBoyz

Jake Deckard was born to play the bad ass army man, and that is exactly what he is in this set. He’s pumped, mean looking and exudes a cocky, aggressive demeanor. Our favorite pics see Jake bound to a tree, and blindfolded, lying there, ready to be taken advantage of.

Visit HairyBoyz.com

peter parker says:

this guy looks like J Jonah Jameson from Spiderman – can’t go wrong with that look!!

pete says:

i just woke up its 1978 and i am 20 again thanks for the retro photos they make this this old queen think 2008 guys are better

Blah! says:

That’s the ugliest fucking tattoo I have ever seen!

RFX says:

This guy tries too hard. Every time I see him in porn, I get turned off by him and his mole.

Garrett says:

San Francisco’s Castro District, circa 1978. This guy has ever right to look the way he does and dress the way he does and tattoo and pierce his body the way he does, BUT WE HAVE EVER RIGHT NOT TO HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. I wouldn’t give that site a plug nickel to see this guy. He can hang on to that look, but the whole package is really unattractive. Who the heck tattos himself like that under body hair? Was he really drunk that night? And it’s an ugly tattoo. He probably grunts real loud when he fucks and says things like: “you want me, boy?” Or, “you want it hard, don’t you boy?” Or “you like my cock up your ass right?” It’s to laugh.

Dz says:

I think he’s pretty hot, but not with the pornstache. Short beard much better.

Vic says:

Garrett: You ignorant, ungrateful, self-centered, pretentious and deprived little prick! Those guys from the “Castro District” and other progressive areas across the country, circa 1978 (before & after), paved the way for YOU to have this forum TODAY that you can post senseless comments on. NOT to mention probably work in an enviornment where you can, without much, if any hesitation, disclose that you’re “gay”. IF this guy WAS part of that era, bless him! If the two of you were walking down Rodeo Drive TODAY, which one of you would guys turn around to take a second look at? Not trying to be nasty, but THINK your comments through!

Garrett says:

VIC WRITES: “Garrett: You ignorant, ungrateful, self-centered, pretentious and deprived little prick!” I’m hardly ignorant – I have a 144 IQ and a Masters in English, and teach at the university level. I’m can’t be ungrateful because I wasn’t given anything to be ungrateful about. I’m not self-centered because I work with foreign nationals who are learning creative writing, donate 15% of my income to charities, and spend Satruday’s helping the homeless at a soup kitchen. I’m hardly pretentious – you’d have to know me to make that claim. I drive a Chevy Malibu, live in a three-bedroom upper flat, love IHOP pancakes, and think bowling is the cat’s meow. As for deprived? Again, you’d have to know me to make that claim. If you’re talking sexually deprived – hardly – I’ve been in a stable, steady, very happy and healthy and activerelationship with my BFF Jeff for 11 years and we raise an abandoned set of eight-year old twins (a boy and a girl) we adopted. So before you toss idiocies around Miss Vicky, learn to read, learn to parse grammar, learn to mellow, and stop acting as if we insulted your past, because – English professor that I am – I can read between the lines and it certainly seems as if you were strolling down Castro Street looking exactly like this lunk in the photos. So Miss Vicky, I’m thinking the lady doth protest too much. In your silliness, you forgot the salient points of my comment, which is that LUNK can look anyway he wants, but we have the right not to have to pay for it. Simmer down luv.

spike92101 says:

eewwww. Yuck!

Vic says:

Garret: I promise you, it is NEVER my intent to offend. I’d like to take a closer look at what you’re saying.
I lost my partner on Decatur St. in New Orleans NOT Castro St.. My pain is the same! I’ll be glad to talk with you!

Vic says:

Garrett: Incidentally, I NEVER got into that silly, sophomoric, and
demeaning bullshit of referring to ANY of my gay brothers as She, Her, Miss, or in my case “Vicky”.
I’d appreciate the same courtesy.
Regards

MM says:

whreow let’s pull the claws in ladies! this dude looks PSYCHO, forget about the year he’s stuck in. he looks like 1968 vietnam which is before 1978. either way it’s waay too uugly for my eyes.although with a goatee and minus the soo tired nipple ring, he would make a great drill sergeant, 1234 bend over boy,5678 if u scream I will slap u,9101112 take my dick like a bitch!

Michael says:

Looks like he stepped out of a time machine from the 1970s. YUCK!! Not into that look at all!

swifty says:

Fussy.Fussy. I’d cornhole him anytime

CarlBrego says:

Jake Deckard overdoes the macho bit just a tad but he’s actually a top rate porn performer. He’s equally adept at being the aggressive top or a hungry, submissive bottom, without losing one drop of his manhood. I wouldn’t expect him to win any ribbons on a blog where malnourished, underdeveloped “twinks” who don’t look a day over 14 are idolized but some of us enjoy REAL MEN like Jake. I’d take this hot, hairy, beefy, tattooed stud with the handlebar moustache over most of the other “things” I’ve seen on this board!

BOB says:

By the way — it’s Folsom Street 1978 — or Folsom, Siver Lake, and so on, up until today, because many men find a guy like this to be hot. (not so much for me, but he is sexy, and the act is good)

Quote –I’m not self-centered because I work with foreign nationals who are learning creative writing, donate 15% of my income to charities, and spend Satruday’s helping the homeless at a soup kitchen__
YOU OUGHT TO–
1– Spend Satruday’s (sic) taking massive classes on homophobia. Queers who dont hate themselves do not go to the 2nd page of pictures of GUYS THEY DONT EVEN LIKE in order to write bitchy, mean comments.
2– notice that queen bitchiness is something we all would have hoped was over by 1978.
3– use your tres fab IQ to figure out that people are PAYING to see this guy, thus he and the vendor are providing something that is WANTED. When you trash that, you deny people the right to like WHAT THEY LIKE.

PS — Yeah sure — unwanted twin orphans! I suggest you pass them on to less narrow minded people to raise.

I apologize to other readers for taking this much space (if it passes webmaster check) — and gently remind you that dishing and trashing ONE gay man is doing it to us all. If we make ourselves silly and petty, the homophobes win.