Mystery Members Only Model #16 at GayHoopla:
Hairy young guy jerks off at GayHoopla.
Watch Mystery Model 16 at GayHoopla
Watch Mystery Model 16 at GayHoopla
Related Posts
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #1
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #3
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #6 (Revealed as Rick Randolph)
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #14
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #9
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #2 (Revealed as Troy Daniel)
GayHoopla: Mystery Members Only Model #10
GayHoopla: [Masked] Mystery Members Only Model #22
Miguel Purdue on HGF
Congratulations. Everything is wrong on this site, is so stupid hide the faces of hotguysfuck models, People will find out.
It’s just crazy, they promote by hiding faces, then show promos before and after scenes to subscribers? WTF, we already subscribe.
Re everything else being wrong, yes absolutely true, other than a few very hot guys, they are able to recruit better than any other site, though the new guys haven’t been as hot lately.
Old discussion, GH always have same complaints. They have few Hot models but only for solo scenes, for me is waste of time. I think they stopped investing in gay porn, the focus now is straight porn but they will not admit.
The GH’s staff director, producer does not contribute to the site.
I know, I think I say it every week or two. Sorry, but it’s just hard to understand their thinking. As as subscriber, it’s funny but my primary reason for cancelling is because of the crap before and after scenes. They’ve cut down on the stupid discussions with the guy behind the camera in the actual downloaded scenes, but now we get the promo crap instead. To me the straight site (HGF) doesn’t exist, I don’t care who appears there.
Yes I agree, Both sites are not treated equally. GH has only one hardcore scene per week, no bareback, almost every solo guy does not return, and all models have to do straight scene, no openly gay models. I’m not going to give money to a site just to improve the straight site, it’s unfair.
I don’t disagree with your thoughts, but I’d think the straight site has many more potential subscribers, and may already have more subscribers– which of course means more revenue. From a business perspecitive, I can’t blame the owners. Doens’t mean we have to like it.